Kahran Ramsus

Honestly, I don't really care. I just don't want to here the bitching afterwards about how they screwed up their lives. There is enough information out there that you should know what you are doing. You made a choice, and you are the one who has to deal with it. It isn't up to the rest of us to deal with your problems. If you decide to stick you hand in the crocodile's mouth, don't complain if you lose it.

You just hit on why I think it should be allowed. It is symbolic. Keep it in the Church and out of government. More specifically, state marriages (where any two consenting adults should be able to be married) and religious marriages (based on the laws of a particular religious sect) are not the same thing and it needs to be made clear that they are not.

In my opinion it is (if you don't take precautions), but I also don't think it is the government's right to regulate it. I have the same view with gay marriage which is why I am for it. But the gay marriage supporters are being such assholes about it, it is turning a lot of people that don't really care either way against them. EDIT: I should defend my opinion on pre-marital sex. It is specifically the one night stand type relationships that I am against. As long as you know what you are getting into, I don't see anything wrong with it.

Yes, they can. They can marry a member of the opposite sex the same as we can. There is nothing that they are born with (like race) that says they can't do something. I can't marry another man and I'm not gay. They are gay and they can marry a woman. We have the same rights. Love is completely irrelevent.

Is that necessary? They can get married in theory. They just chose not to. And if you truly love someone, you don't need a piece of paper to tell you. Look, even if their goal is the right one (and I see no reason why they shouldn't get married) if they are going about it the wrong way (like the case in San Fran) then they will end up losing anyways because public support will turn against them.

I don't see how this situation compares with the Civil Rights movement. Gays can do all the same things straight people do now.

2003 - Chicago over Gangs of NY, The Hours, LOTR TTT, The Pianist (my pick: The Pianist) 2002 - A Beautiful Mind over Gosford Park, In the Bedroom, LOTR Fellowship, Moulin Rouge (my pick: A Beautiful Mind) 2001 - Gladiator over Chocolat, Erin Brockovich, Traffic, Tiger & Dragon (pick: Gladiator) 2000 - American Beauty over Cider House Rules, Green Mile, Insider, Sixth Sense (pick: The Insider) 1999 - Shakespeare in Love over Elizabeth, Private Ryan, Thin Red Line, Life Is Beautiful (pick: Saving Private Ryan, but special mention to the Truman Show which was the real best movie of the year.) 1998 - Titanic over As Good As It Gets, Full Monty, Good Will Hunting, LA Confidential (pick: LA Confidential) 1997 - English Patient over Fargo, Jerry Maguire, Secrets & Lies, Shine (pick: Fargo) 1996 - Braveheart over Apollo 13, Babe, Il Postino, Sense and Sensibility (pick: Apollo 13) 1995 - Forrest Gump over Four Weddings and a Funeral, Pulp Fiction, Quiz Show, Shawshank Redemption (pick: Pulp Fiction)

Here is the difference between Gigli and House of the Dead. HOTD was dead in the water from the beginning. There was no chance in hell that could have been even halfway decent. Gigli should have been good with the budget and talent involved. It was the biggest crime.

LOTR should not have won best editing. However, the wrong film winning best editing isn't as bad as the wrong film winning Best Picture. The Academy doesn't seem to know anything about most of the technical categories anyways. It wasn't even the most moronic decision in that category in the last five years. Traffic beating Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon was much worse.

Tomlinson > Portis and he does it with a terrible offense.

So, do you guys have like clothes and houses and stuff, or do you live in igloos?

Yeah, don't insult us Canadians for something we didn't do. We don't want this moron in our country any more than you do. And yes, we have a Constitution. http://www.solon.org/Constitutions/Canada/...sh/ca_1982.html

Shakespeare in Love wasn't even as good as Elisabeth. The Truman Show should have won, but it wasn't even nominated.

Shawn would normally win, but with his injury, I have to say HHH.

That's the point of editing. The idea is to make every single scene and every single shot mean something. When you have five minutes of nothing happening (esp. in a movie that ends up running around 3 1/2 hrs), you're wasting time and diluting the story. If anything, they cut out too much. As anyone who as actually seen them will tell you, the Extended Editions are far surperior to the theatrical cuts. BTW, you must have hated Lawrence of Arabia.

American Beauty wasn't the rightful winner either. The Insider should have won.

Murray was screwed.

Hillary Swank won didn't she?

I hope Murray wins this.

You mean Titanic wasn't a comedy?

Lose the beard Tobey.

11? I think LOTR can tie if they win them all. Ben-Hur holds the record, I know that much.

I don't see why it would be a jab at LOTR. There were a ton of Australians involved with Master & Commander.

WHOO HOO! Another win for Master & Commander!

Didn't Brazil refuse to send it in because they thought it was too violent or something?