Kahran Ramsus

Looks like the city of Philadelphia's tough luck against Toronto is going to continue.

This thread is unnecessary. Keep the Virtual Console discussion to the Wii thread.

It was. Don't do it again.

Arizona Diamondbacks 77.5 OVER Atlanta Braves 81.5 UNDER Baltimore Orioles 73.5 UNDER Boston Red Sox 90.5 UNDER Chicago Cubs 85.5 UNDER Chicago White Sox 86.5 OVER Cincinnati Reds 76.5 UNDER Cleveland Indians 84.5 OVER Colorado Rockies 74.5 OVER Detroit Tigers 87.5 OVER Florida Marlins 78.5 UNDER Houston Astros 78.5 OVER Kansas City Royals 67.5 UNDER Los Angeles Angels 89.5 UNDER Los Angeles Dodgers 88.5 UNDER Milwaukee Brewers 81.5 UNDER Minnesota Twins 83.5 OVER New York Mets 88.0 OVER New York Yankees 97.0 UNDER Oakland Athletics 84.5 OVER Philadelphia Phillies 88.5 OVER Pittsburgh Pirates 71.5 UNDER San Diego Padres 84.0 UNDER San Francisco Giants 81.5 UNDER Seattle Mariners 75.5 OVER St Louis Cardinals 84.5 OVER Tampa Bay Devil Rays 67.0 OVER Texas Rangers 81.5 UNDER Toronto Blue Jays 86.5 OVER Washington Nationals 66.5 UNDER

I'm curious about why you started Stottlemyre over Cone.

Cone took the loss? What was he doing in in the 19th? I guess when you get to 19 innings, your bullpen becomes pretty depleted and you need to go to a starter. Shouldn't he have been the one starting that game though if Morris, Key & Guzman started the first three?

Cone took the loss? What was he doing in in the 19th?

If they had known what they were doing, then either: a) The Ladder Match wouldn't have been scheduled b) The Ladder Match would still be scheduled That they made a major booking change like that just days before the PPV with no injuries from the participants shows that they do not in fact know what they are doing.

Congratulations to the 2007 AFC West Champion Denver Broncos!

The first thing that came to mind was Bret Hart's rant after losing to Sid in a Cage Match for the WWF Championship on RAW (the one where Austin was helping Bret so he would get a title shot at Mania).

I've been looking to pick up an NBA game. Would you guys recommend this one to be the one to get?

Also Soriano is on the Cubs now.

C - Brian McCann (Atlanta) 1B - Albert Pujols (St. Louis) 2B - Chase Utley (Philadelphia) 3B - Alex Rodriguez (New York Yankees) SS - Miguel Tejada (Baltimore) RF - Ichiro Suzuki (Seattle) CF - Carlos Beltran (New York Mets) LF - Manny Ramirez (Boston) DH - Travis Hafner (Cleveland) SP - Johan Santana (Minnesota) SP - Roy Halladay (Toronto) SP - Dontrelle Willis (Florida) SP - Brandon Webb (Arizona) SP - Roy Oswalt (Houston) Closer - Francisco Rodriguez (Los Angelas Angels) Bench C - A. J. Pierzynski (Chicago White Sox) IF - Mark Texiera (Texas) IF - Mark Teahen (Kansas City) IF - Ray Durham (San Francisco) IF - Bill Hall (Milwaukee) IF - Ryan Zimmerman (Washington) OF - Jason Bay (Pittsburgh) OF - Alfonso Soriano (Chicago Cubs) OF - Carl Crawford (Tampa Bay) Bullpen Aaron Harang (Cincinnati) Kenny Rogers (Detroit) Jake Peavy (San Diego) Jeff Francis (Colorado) Takashi Saito (Los Angelas Dodgers) Huston Street (Oakland)

1992 Toronto Blue Jays

Am I being forced to change my pick of Soriano then? No. I'm simply voicing my opinion.

I don't think Soriano should even be eligible at second base considering he doesn't even play there anymore.

Most people don't really count that one because of the Super Bowl loss. Certainly by Super Bowl IV, that game had surpassed the NFL Championship in stature with the merger occurring for the next season. Even if you want to say that the championships that Green Bay won during the existence of the AFL are 'disputed', that still leaves them tied with Chicago overall with 9 Championships (6 NFL titles pre-AFL and 3 Super Bowls). Even the Lions managed 4 NFL Championships. Let's face it, the Vikings aren't exactly the most successful franchise in the league when it comes to winning championships. They are better than the likes of the Saints and Falcons, but that isn't saying much. No matter how good they are, they always seem to find a way to lose. The 1998 NFC Championship is the defining moment of the franchise, much in the same way Norwood is for Buffalo. That's not a good thing.

I'm more interested in finding out the reasons why people didn't pick Utley at second.

Tark is the greatest Viking of all time Carter is a close second. Moss is a tough call. Yeah he put up legendary numbers during his seven seasons in MN, but he's really crapped out now. Tarkenton was a great player and everything, but playoff misery and spending five of his prime seasons as a Giant put him below Carter.

That's because it is a Smackdown PPV. If you want crap, wait until Backlash.

1. Jerry Rice 2. Don Hutson. He basically invented the true receiver and is still Green Bay's all-time scoring leader to this day. 3. Steve Largent. At the time of his retirement he held most of the important receiving records. 4. Tim Brown. I never considered him the best WR in the NFL, but that's because he was playing with Rice most of the time. The career numbers don't lie. 5. Cris Carter. Forget Randy Moss, this is the real best Vikings player of all-time. I won't include active players, unless they would be in the top five if they retired tomorrow. Harrison is the only one who comes close to cracking my top five, but Holt might be headed there to eventually. Holt is my top current WR. He might get out performed by the likes of Steve Smith, Randy Moss, TO, etc. in a particular year, but he is the only one (besides Harrison) who is fantastic every year.

Ginn probably isn't going to be there when Green Bay drafts, and their focus should probably be on a RB anyways.

1. SS Jose Reyes 2. CF Carlos Beltran 3. 3B Alex Rodriguez 4. 1B Albert Pujols 5. DH Travis Hafner 6. RF Vladimir Guerrero 7. LF Manny Ramirez 8. 2B Chase Utley 9. C Joe Mauer

what about lashly though? i mean you can tell it's already going to be taker vs batista, but who's lashly going to face? Probably Hardcore Holly. Lets be honest, nobody in the company really cares about ECW anymore, or at least it appears that way. Either way, Undertaker is not going to win his first Rumble and then challenge for a title in a promotion that wasn't even in existence when he first joined the WWF.

It will be Batista. HBK is naturally going to be the other #1 Contender and there is no way Triple H is going to let his buddy get sent to the Smackdown roster to fight Batista. Cena isn't going anywhere either. That leaves Batista/Taker by default.