Bush honorable eh......?

[Guest NoCalMike]

Documents Show Bush Violated SEC Insider Trading Law Four Times, Not Once. His Lawyer Ran The SEC Investigation On Harken And His Father's Gave The SEC Clearance Of Wrongdoing During Bush Presidency.

 

According to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission records, on four separate occasions Gov. George W. Bush disregarded federal statutes by failing to file insider stock trade reports on a timely basis, back-dating one trade by some four months. Moreover, one key trade just a few weeks before Iraq invaded Kuwait -- but reported some eight months late after the Gulf War was over -- netted Bush close to $1 million in profit as he sold stock in Harken Energy, an oil company doing business in the Middle East wherein some of his father's largest contributors also maintained substantial positions.

 

The SEC under President Bush carried out an incomplete investigation of the younger Bush's pre-Gulf War trade in 1991 after key presidential advisor George Jr. claimed that he filed a report, but that the SEC had most likely lost it. (No one has really asked whether the governor bothered to use registered mail to verify receipt of the documents.)

 

According to an Oct. 28, 1991, Time Magazine report, SEC spokesman John Heine said, "as far as I know, nobody ever found the 'lost' filing." And, strangely, Bush refused comment to Time regarding either the incident or his involvement with Harken.

 

The governor also did not reveal the blatant conflicts of interest involved, since the chairman of the SEC was Richard Breedon, former lawyer with Houston firm Baker and Botts and deputy counsel to Bush's father when he was vice president. Breedon received his SEC appointment after the elder Bush became president.

 

The SEC investigation of George W. was led by general counsel James R. Doty who, according to a UPI report, mysteriously neglected to interview any of the Harken directors. Moreover, Doty had previously served as George W. Bush's personal lawyer in the deal involving his Texas Rangers purchase. So, in the end, the younger Bush was cleared of insider trade wrongdoing by his personal attorney and by his father's vice-presidential counsel, a virtual impossibility for the average U.S. citizen....

 

Most reports involving Bush's insider oil stock trades refer only to his highly controversial June 22, 1990, million dollar trade made six weeks before Gulf War hostilities broke out in Kuwait -- a trade which was reported eight months later. However, SEC documents between 1986 and 1993 show that Bush acquired 212,152 shares of Harken stock on Nov. 1, 1986, at the time he merged his Spectrum 7 company with Harken. But the future governor did not report the transaction until April 7, 1987 -- more than five months later.

 

When Bush filed late on April 7,1987, SEC filings show he had purchased another 80,000 shares on March 10, 1987. But strangely, two weeks later, an April 22 filing noted that the 80,000-share purchase was backdated to Dec. 10, 1986. When questioned by the media, Bush's attorney said it was the same 80,000 shares but he could not explain the discrepancy regarding the purchase dates or why Bush even reported the trade two times.

 

Another SEC filing, this from June 6, 1989, showed that Bush purchased another 25,000 shares of Harken but again waited more than four months to report the transaction.

 

The Houston Post, recognizing Bush's late SEC filings, noted that he "took eight months to notify the government of his sale of stock in a company on whose board he served" and "also missed the filing deadline for reporting other insider trades involving Harken Energy."

 

Documents obtained by the Post showed "additional instances in which Bush ... ran afoul of the SEC rule requiring notification." And George W. described himself as a "small, insignificant" Harken stockholder; but news reports examining SEC documents identified Bush as the third largest non-institutional investor.

 

--Tom Flocco, WND, 02.18.00

 

Bush Tuesday Speech: "Don't Do As I Did, Do As I Say." Wink, Wink, Nudge, Nudge.

 

"On Tuesday, George W. Bush is scheduled to give a speech intended to put him in front of the growing national outrage over corporate malfeasance. He will sternly lecture Wall Street executives about ethics and will doubtless portray himself as a believer in old-fashioned business probity.

 

Yet this pose is surreal, given the way top officials like Secretary of the Army Thomas White, Dick Cheney and Mr. Bush himself acquired their wealth. As Joshua Green says in The Washington Monthly, in a must-read article written just before the administration suddenly became such an exponent of corporate ethics: "The `new tone' that George W. Bush brought to Washington isn't one of integrity, but of permissiveness. . . . In this administration, enriching oneself while one's business goes bust isn't necessarily frowned upon."

 

Unfortunately, the administration has so far gotten the press to focus on the least important question about Mr. Bush's business dealings: his failure to obey the law by promptly reporting his insider stock sales. It's true that Mr. Bush's story about that failure has suddenly changed, from "the dog ate my homework" to "my lawyer ate my homework — four times." But the administration hopes that a narrow focus on the reporting lapses will divert attention from the larger point: Mr. Bush profited personally from aggressive accounting identical to the recent scams that have shocked the nation. "

 

--Paul Krugman, NYT, 07.07.02

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, you can either write this off as a "vast left-wing conspiracy" or forget you ever said Bush was an HONORABLE man........

[Guest ant_7000]

Bush is a dumbass to me so is far from honorable

[Guest Crazy Dan]

But Bush could never do anything wrong. Never. He's Republican and not named Clinton. See Republicans never do anything wrong, it's always the Democrats fault. So all that insider trading stuff was the Democrats fault.

 

Please take these comments with a grain of salt. And yes this was before he was elected President, so I am not calling for anything like his resignition or such. But, this shows that no one is an angel anymore.

[Guest NoCalMike]

I am not calling for his resignation either. It is just funny that all the candidates ran on a "I am not immoral or bad like Clinton" platform, and that is why they deserve to get all the shit they do, because no one that makes it as far as president(so far) is all that honorable, with a few exceptions in there awhile back.......

[Guest LesnarLunatic]

I blame this all on the Democrats! It's obvious that they used their mind control powers to make Bush file his forms late and then they made Ari lie about that also.

 

Anyways, impeachment for borderline perjury? impeach somebody for perjury? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Good one!

 

It's borderline perjury since I'd think filling those forms has a box that says "Under penalty of perjury, everything is truthful" or whatever.

 

Just be like the President and file your income taxes late. *smirk*

[Guest DrTom]

Wow, a politician with a few skeletons in the closet. This certainly IS news!

 

At least Bush never promised "the most ethical administration in history."

 

This will be to Bush what Whitewater ultimately was to Clinton: a shady deal from the past that the opposing party loves to raise when it's politically convenient to cast aspersion on the president.

[Guest EricMM]

And I wish both parties woud STOP IT~!

 

Deal with the issues people, not the past.

[Guest Some Guy]

Now I know this thread started from a coment I made in another thread, which was "Bush is more honorable than Clinton." And even if this is true I stand by that statement. Clinton did far more adn far worse than this. ANd I never said Bush was as honorable as your everyday guy, but he is pretty good for a politician.

[Guest DrTom]

"Now I know this thread started from a coment I made in another thread, which was 'Bush is more honorable than Clinton.'"

 

He is. I guess that's hard for Clinton worshippers to handle, but it's true. Certainly, Bush is not perfect, and like all men, has been guilty of transgressions in his past. But considering that Clinton was as morally bankrupt as they come, almost anyone would be more honorable by comparison. I don't see that remark as a compliment to Bush (I guess it is, but it's quite a left-handed one), but rather as a condemnation of Clinton.

[Guest NoCalMike]

Ok, well I don't think Clinton was honorable, never really did. It is just that a lot of conservatives(not necessarily ones on this board) had the attitude that the Bush's were just on a moral high ground, and couldn't be touched in that aspect. I just wanted to lay that BS to rest.

[Guest Some Guy]

In comparison to Clinton he is on the moral high ground, that's all I said. And yes many Republicans due think he is the ultimate paragon of virtue. He is a politician, so he can't be perfect.

[Guest Vern Gagne]

Wait a second I thought George W. was an idiot, he obviously had someone else make this deal.

 

According to a few Dems on TV tonight they feel Bush is only guilty of poor judgment.

[Guest NoCalMike]

<<<<Wait a second I thought George W. was an idiot, he obviously had someone else make this deal.

 

According to a few Dems on TV tonight they feel Bush is only guilty of poor judgment. >>>>

 

Of course Bush had someone else make the deals, I am sure he had advisors and Daddy's buddies telling him how to do it. As far as what the democrats think, well yah, that just figures that when confronted with something they just wuss out and try to make peace.