Guest bob_barron Report post Posted July 9, 2002 Crash Holly??? He isnt worse than Nash Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest alfdogg Report post Posted July 9, 2002 Crash WHY?? What makes Crash worse than Nash? He can take good bumps, which right there makes him better than Nash. He can work with just about anyone, from cruisers to the Hardcore division. Do you just not like him or something? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest thebigjig Report post Posted July 9, 2002 How the hell can you consider Crash for the worst wrestler list? I know everyone is entitled to their own opinions... but geez, Crash shouldn't be listed anywhere near the likes of Gigante, New Jack, or hell even Kevin Nash Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest CED Ordonez Report post Posted July 9, 2002 Bossman bumped around pretty well when he was ultra pudgy Big Bossman. That's pretty much all I can defend Bossman with though. Anyway, El Gigante/Giant Gonzales was worse than Nash talent and charisma wise. New Jack falls below Nash as well despite his homicide record, which doesn't matter in the ring anyway. I've at least seen Nash use a big boot and chinlock, which is about one or two more wrestling moves than I ever saw New Jack do. Has nobody said Loch Ness or The Yeti yet? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mr. Slim Citrus Report post Posted July 9, 2002 As Hoooorible as El Gigante was in the ring, how can you all overlook the Giant Silva? That guy was like El Gigante without the charisma... I liked the Bossman during his heel feud with Hogan in '88, and during his feud with Big Show in '99. Dragging the coffin off KFA! Having a hardon for big men is one thing, but anybody who thinks that Nash is a better wrestler than Crash has to have some sort of personal vendetta against him. And I like Test; sue me. Test is my fourth favorite non-crusierweight in the entire WWE (for the record, though, I consider any wrestler under 235 to be a cruiserweight, even if they aren't booked as such. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheHulkster Report post Posted July 9, 2002 There was a period between 1990 and 1991 where Bossman was dragging good matches out of Haku and the fucking Barbarian(*** from Royal Rumble 91, not even Bret could get a good match out of the Barbarian). His match from spring stampede 94 against Vader was off the charts. On the worst wrestler topic, Sid is much worse than Nash. Sid had the 2 worst Wrestlemania main events ever (believe me, they were fucking bad), and has never had a match that was even good that I can remember (I thought the Survivor Series 96 match sucked dick, the only entertaining thing about it was the crowd heat). At least with Nash, some of the time the matches would step into "it was all right I guess" mode. El Gigante is worse than Sid, and thats saying something. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest BionicRedneck Report post Posted July 9, 2002 "No, he really doesn't rock at all. He's sucky on the mic, sucky in the ring, has no charisma and is generally an embarrising roid freak." couldn't have said it better myself. NAsh (in his prime) was a mile better than Test. Whoever said Silver King was worse than Nash should be shot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest gwf0704 Report post Posted July 9, 2002 How the hell can you consider Crash for the worst wrestler list? I know everyone is entitled to their own opinions... but geez, Crash shouldn't be listed anywhere near the likes of Gigante, New Jack, or hell even Kevin Nash What can I say. Haven't been impressed with his ring work. Now this is the problem I have with this thread. When you mean worst than Nash do you mean wrestling, charisma, pops, or overall. Standards werent set so I gave my opinion. Holly didnt really show much charisma unless you count his Hardcore 24/7 days. I mean when people say Boss Man and New Jack are better "wrestlers" than Nash then why wouldn't Crash be on the list? He doesnt really have that huge a moveset, though he can sell other moves pretty nicely. That is all..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest genius1591 Report post Posted July 9, 2002 Cheese from the NWA-TWA Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest saturnmark4life Report post Posted July 9, 2002 I actually enjoyed some of bossman's matches based on his bumping mobility, whatever anyone says. Kinda the same with Bubba ray. He was the never the dynamite kid, but he used to be a better worker than kevin nash. I also have no problem with test, albert, crash or spike. Mustafa IS the worst wrestler of all time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest LesnarLunatic Report post Posted July 9, 2002 Nash did a plancha once, didn't he? that sorta elevates him. No pun intended Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest El Psycho Diablo Report post Posted July 9, 2002 Some reason, I like that quote. "I was kinda fond of the Grecco-Roman balcony dive. Wrestling Psychology at its finest. " Good one, Papacita. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Celtic Jobber Report post Posted July 9, 2002 Mabel (Viscera) and Fred "Tugboat" Ottman are both alot worse than Kevin Nash. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest El Psycho Diablo Report post Posted July 9, 2002 Kevin Nash may be a 'bad wrestler'..but he'll wind up being more sucessful than many people that are better than he is. Why? He's got charisma. Some of the best workers of the world have the charisma of a rock, and won't make it nearly as far. Just because Nash isn't the best wrestler dosen't mean anything. Look at Hogan. Technical Wizardry isn't necessarily a requirement to be a top star. Marketability is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted July 9, 2002 Give me time I'll give you a Compiled List of all wrestlers who are WORSE than kevin Nash. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted July 9, 2002 Here is the Compiled list of Wrestlers past present and all over the World... That are better than Kevin Nash in terms of condition, work rate and ability Lets git too it 911 Abdullah the Butcher Adrian Adonis (RIP) Andre the Giant (RIP) Bastion booger Big Bossman (Circa 88) The Bushwackers The Natural Disaters Giant Gonzales Giant Silva Headhunters The Godwinns Jack Victory Kamala King Kong Bundy Leatherface Super Leather Mr. Pogo Nikolai Volkoff One Man Gang Steve McMichaels Blue Meanie The Big Show The Shiek Tommy Rich Yokozuna (RIP) ZEUS! if I missed anyone let me know LOL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest genius1591 Report post Posted July 9, 2002 Abdullah the Butcher was good and had many classics, no way he should be on this list. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest endgame722 Report post Posted July 9, 2002 Bradshaw and Rikishi are the two worst non-Tough Enough wrestlers currently in the WWE. Period. There is nobody on the WWE roster who could get a good match out of either of these pieces of shit. Nash's matches with Shawn and Bret were far superior to anything these two have ever been able to scrape together. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Nezbyte Report post Posted July 9, 2002 "And Test is NOT more entertaining than Regal." Yes, yes he is actually. Regal hasnt had any good matches in the WWF/E (which is majorly what i see and remember). Save for MAYBE his match with RVD. His only saving factor is he can talk. Thank all the Gods of Pro Wrestling that Harvard is with him. Test for champ. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Masked Heel Report post Posted July 9, 2002 Two people come to mind Mable may be the worst ever just based on size alone and Zesus it was all choking choking choking with him nothing else i can remember Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest BobbyBacklund Report post Posted July 9, 2002 I think you should restrict this to mainstream, and guys that made a career out of it. That would disqualify guys like Laurence Taylor, David Arquette, and from the history of wrestling, Mongo. I mean, the guy retired from football because he was too old. How can he have anything to do with wrestling? Sometimes this shit just boggles me. Anyway, the reason I say this is because I can think of about one hundred guys on the indy circuit who are worse than Nash RIGHT NOW. But they didn't nearly ruin one company, and destroy another, so I guess they have something going for them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Cubbie78 Report post Posted July 10, 2002 What about Gagne's kid?....Greg I think, now HE was bad if you ever saw old AWA Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest CanadianChris Report post Posted July 10, 2002 As they used to say on the old Match Game...I have the definitive answer. 2 words...LOCH NESS. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest SupaTaft Report post Posted July 10, 2002 You have poor judgement. 911 (Its his gimmick to do nothing more than chokeslam) Abdullah the Butcher (You are an IDIOT! One of the all time greats) Andre the Giant (RIP) (Only sucked the last five years of his life) Big Bossman (Circa 88) (Thats when he was in his prime, he ruled) The Bushwackers (Once again its their gimmick not to be good wrestlers per se) The Natural Disaters (two big fat guys... what do you expect) The Godwinns (They were awesome, fear the slop!) Kamala (Big fat man, good for his size) King Kong Bundy (another legend that you blatantly disrespect) Leatherface (I've heard tell of some good matches from this guy, but they are unverrified) One Man Gang (Another big fat man, still good for his size) Blue Meanie (he had some great matches in ECW) The Shiek (Originator of Hardcore) Yokozuna (RIP) (Why do you hate fat guys?) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted July 10, 2002 "And Test is NOT more entertaining than Regal." Yes, yes he is actually. Regal hasnt had any good matches in the WWF/E (which is majorly what i see and remember). Save for MAYBE his match with RVD. His only saving factor is he can talk. Thank all the Gods of Pro Wrestling that Harvard is with him. Test for champ. As opposed to Test's string of **** classic matches. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest RickyChosyu Report post Posted July 10, 2002 Whoever said Silver King was worse than Nash should be shot. That may be the funniest thing I've ever read on the internet. You know, Nash actually had a good period, unlike El Gigante, Sid, or Locke Ness. Hell, even in the Bad Period, he had a decent match with Paul White in WCW, which is certainly not something many people can say. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites