Who was the better wrestler

[Guest Trivia247]

Who is the better wrestler in this group

 

shane o mac

 

vinnie mac

 

David Artiquette

 

lol

[Guest Anglesault]

Vince. Arquette sucked, and Shane can jump off high things, but Vince can work a pretty decent match.

[Guest SuperTonyJaymz]

Shane O Mac

[Guest CanadianChris]

Shane-o-Mac. Vince is close behind, though. And who was that third guy?

[Guest Hogan Made Wrestling]

Comparing Vince and Shane to Arquette is insulting to them. Both guys can work a decent match of the hardcore/garbage variety (Vince vs. Austin, Vince vs. Flair, Vince vs. Shane, Shane vs. Angle), or in Shane's case even a straight-up match (Shane vs. Test). Arquette can't do anything.

[Guest midnight_burn]

I'd go with Shane McMahon just ahead of Vince.

[Guest claydude14]

shane o mac.

[Guest RickyChosyu]

Eh, it's a toss up between Vince and Shane. Both are willing to bump like freaks, with Shane getting that edge, but Vince has always been better at getting heat on the match. Vince's prick heel character works much better than Shane's "my counter to everything is running away" heel character.

 

I can't believe this thread even exists. Dulirium, sez I.

[Guest Fook_Hing_Ho]

Shane beats his old man, but it's a photo finish.

 

Arquette doesn't even qualify for the race.

[Guest FakeRazor]

I'll give it to Shane. He's worked some good matches, and even if his match sucks, it always has the "HOLY SHIT!" factor in there to keep you entertained. Hey, he even had the 2nd best match of the night at Wrestlemania XV (not that that's saying much).

[Guest Kahran Ramsus]

Shane is perfect as an old-school manager type who gets his ass kicked all the time (like Heenan or Slick). He can have entertaining matches, but only once in awhile or the novelty wears off.

[Guest CanadianChick]

Shane is perfect as an old-school manager type who gets his ass kicked all the time (like Heenan or Slick). He can have entertaining matches, but only once in awhile or the novelty wears off.

It seems that Shane is smart enough to pick his spots when it comes to matches, though.

[Guest Austin3164life]

Ehh, all three of them suck anyway.....

[Guest LesnarLunatic]

Shane. Because he kills himself for our pleasure

[Guest genius1591]

Arquette, the best damn heel and the greatest heavyweight champion of all time. It's ashamed that Vince can put the money to being this workhorse to his promotion.

[Guest TheSmarkzone]

Definitely Shane. Shane is fluid in the ring for a guy who only wrestles every now and then. He sells good, too. Vince just looks awkward in there and he doesn't take the crazy bumps that Shane does.

[Guest Stezton]

I prefer Shane because Vince oversells to the point of looking stupid. (Although I ain't sure who oversells more...Vince or Test...)

[Guest Brian]

Shane's got a lot more insight into working a match than Vince. Shane appreciates the work that goes into putting together a good match better than his dad. If he had the insight of Steph or Vince, he would probably make an excellent booker.

 

Shane is also younger, a better bumper, from what I remember has the bigger moveset, and just generally lays out his matches better.

[Guest dreamer420]

my vote goes to shane. he can move around the ring and throw a decent looking punch. plus he's the insane bump machine too. i would list vince second as he is not good in the ring but he isn't exactly el giante either. vince can bump like a crazy old man too. remember the st. valentine's day massacre vs. austin.

[Guest bps "The Truth" 21]

Shane

[Guest The Superstar]

Arquette. He won the title with honor and defended it with honor until he lost it. What a champion...

 

 

 

...

[Guest dreamer420]

lol. good post superstar. i guess he was the only person to defend their title in a main event at a pay per view. that doesn't exactly sound good for wcw actually.

[Guest The Superstar]

Yeah Vince was an idiot, he actually vacated the title. DOESN'T HE KNOW, that only DEGRADES THE HONOR OF THE CHAMPIONSHIP!?! At least Arquette lost it with his pride and dignity intact.

[Guest caboose]

Shane first, Vince second and Arquettel LAST.

Shane bumps like you wish you could bump, and Vince can get his ass kicked quite well but takes the Stunner so horribly. And considering he took it so many times, there is no excuse.

Arquette only has one thing going for him:

His wife.

An even see looks horrible nowadays.

[Guest Shaved Bear]

shane-o

[Guest pinnacleofallthingsmanly]

Remember when Shane got the title match against Kurt Angle as the RAW Main Event? They had RVD accompany him to the ring in what had to be one of the low points of the Invasion.

[Guest HartFan86]

I compare Shane to RVD and Vince to Hogan.

 

Shane has my vote.

[Guest SupaTaft]

You know, Shane can move better and can put on a decent show with little more than agility and jumping off of things. But I am gonna say Vince, he just does more to entertain me.

 

Arquette sucks. He deserves to burn in hell.

[Guest Harry Hood]

I'm going with Vince because you always want him to lose his matches...with shane you're usually cheering to hard to notice.

 

So Vicne gets the job done better.

[Guest KingOfOldSchool]

I would say that Arquette is GOD...

 

But it wouldn't be with a straight face. In all seriousness, Shane is the best.