Guest The Masked Yodeler Report post Posted February 18, 2002 With Kurt Angle beating HHH for the Wrestlemania title shot, and all the confusion about the Wrestlemania main event(s) now that the nWo has arrived, the possibility of a tournament for a vacant WWF title seems like a possibility. Here's a scenario: Jericho is defending the WWF title on Raw, and there's a double pin or something dumb, so the WWF title is held up in a tournament at Wrestlemania. Let's say that Jericho, Angle and whoever Jericho was defending against, let's say HHH, all get byes into the second round. Assuming that it would be a 16 man tournament, the most likely possibility, that leaves 13 total slots: The Established WWF Main Eventers: Jericho Angle HHH Rock Austin Undertaker The nWo: Hogan Hall Nash The Upper Mid Carders: Kane RVD Booker T Edge There's 13 guys, and a tournament. I'm not saying it's a great idea, but I wouldn't be surprised to see it happen, and it would be something different, at least. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest AM The Kid Report post Posted February 18, 2002 I was thinking about that a few days ago...it could give a needed push to the upper-midcard guys and clear up the undercard for tag matches, other title matches and fueds. Wrestlemania would be awesome if they had a WWF title tournament. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Tony149 Report post Posted February 18, 2002 I don't know. I wouldn't mind a tournament, but it would need to be booked carefully. Hogan would probably win. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Masked Yodeler Report post Posted February 19, 2002 I'm a mark for tournaments, but bad booking can screw them up baaaad, regardless of the talent involved (see KOTR 2000). I'd like to see RVD go over, but I know that's not going to happen, so I'd be happy with anyone other than The Tan That Walks Like A Man. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest AM The Kid Report post Posted February 19, 2002 I'd want Jericho to get the the finals only to be beaten by Austin, RVD or *gasp* Hogan. I'm a huge Hogan mark, always have been always will be! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Electrifyer Report post Posted February 19, 2002 They already had a tournament at Vengeance for the Undisputed Title, they don't need another one for Wrestlemania. If they're going to do anything special for the WM min-event, then I suggest just to make it a triple threat or something. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest AM The Kid Report post Posted February 19, 2002 There was a tournament...I don't remember that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Tony149 Report post Posted February 19, 2002 I don't think Vengeance was a tournament. The matches on Raw & Smackdown were part of a min-tournament with the final four guys meeting at the PPV. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Some Guy Report post Posted February 19, 2002 If they do a tournament it can't be like Survivor Series 98, with ten second matches. It should a smaller tourney with longer matches that have time to develop and to really sell how hard it is to become champ. No lame 15 minute restholds time limit draws either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Report post Posted February 19, 2002 The problem with a tournament is that they only work really well when someone wins the title for the first time. RVD? No matter how over he is...Vince won't let that happen. I'd like to see a tourney...with Booker T winning. That would own. But a tournament would guarantee non-wins for at least 2/3 of the NWO...not exactly the way to be brought in. I also wouldn't mind if Jericho won the title back...that would be unexpected and cement him on the top. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Tony149 Report post Posted February 19, 2002 If they do a tournament it can't be like Survivor Series 98, with ten second matches. It should a smaller tourney with longer matches that have time to develop and to really sell how hard it is to become champ. No lame 15 minute restholds time limit draws either. That wouldn't be the case with WrestleMania. Since WrestleMania is about 3 hours and 50 minutes long. Survivor Series '98 was about 2hrs 45mins long. WM would have a lot more time for the matches...at least for the good matches. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Some Guy Report post Posted February 19, 2002 WM IV was four hours and the matches were short and sucky. My point is really that they should have a 8 man tourney like the first few KOTRs, with 4 hours they could also allow time for the undercard matches, IC, Euro, Tag, etc.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Tony149 Report post Posted February 19, 2002 WM IV was four hours and the matches were short and sucky. My point is really that they should have a 8 man tourney like the first few KOTRs, with 4 hours they could also allow time for the undercard matches, IC, Euro, Tag, etc.. I agree. That's why tournaments have to be booked carefully. The talent roster is a helluva lot better (Except for a few) now then it was back then. An 8 man tournament wouldn't be bad either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Some Guy Report post Posted February 19, 2002 I would have Hogan, HHH, Angle, Austin, Rock, Y2J, RVD, and Booker in the tourney with Hogan going over due to interference by nWo. This would lead to his singles feuds with Rock, Austin, HHH, etc... I don't really wabnt Hogan as champ but it makes sense, for him to be chased by one of the faces. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Tony149 Report post Posted February 19, 2002 Yeah, Hogan will probably get a run with the titles. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Report post Posted February 19, 2002 Does that bother anyone else? At this point...wouldn't a Hogan title run do as much to expose the business as David Arquette winning it? Times have changed. People are more athletic than in Hogan heyday. The Rock looks bigger than him...and Rock's not even one of the bigger guys... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites