Guest ShooterJay Posted July 17, 2002 Report Posted July 17, 2002 I was perusing through www.whatever-dude.com (an awesome site, btw, and they're all wrestling fans) and read this interesting article on Harry Knowles. http://www.whatever-dude.com/posts/276.shtml Anyway, reading it, I noticed a lot of parallels between Knowles and Scott Keith, and wrestling/movies in general. Just thought it would be interesting to think about, and it shows that maybe the WWE should pay at least a little more attention to internet fans (die-hards) and consider their opinions seriously.
Guest Incandenza Posted July 17, 2002 Report Posted July 17, 2002 Keith has a better grip on the English language than Knowles.
Guest RetroRob215 Posted July 17, 2002 Report Posted July 17, 2002 "He was a self-confessed comic book geek lacking direction and drifting through life - the idiot savant slacker." That line could describe either of them.
Guest dreamer420 Posted July 17, 2002 Report Posted July 17, 2002 i think they are twin brothers aren't they?
Guest HartFan86 Posted July 18, 2002 Report Posted July 18, 2002 Does anyone have a pic of Scott Keith/
Guest dreamer420 Posted July 18, 2002 Report Posted July 18, 2002 wasn't there a thread about this in the site feedback folder. i know i seen a pic of him there and it was worth finding too.
Guest J*ingus Posted July 18, 2002 Report Posted July 18, 2002 They aren't quite the same. Keith is relentlessly negative towards a lot of wrestling, the scary part being that he actually goes easier on the WW(F)E than foreign or indy wrestling. Knowles on the other hand is a bonafide suckup a lot of the time, with about 80% of his movie reviews being glowing handjobs of the filmmakers.
Guest dreamer420 Posted July 19, 2002 Report Posted July 19, 2002 i guess you are right. if there is one thing scott keith doesn't do it is suck up the the wwe. i haven't heard him say one nice thing in like 4 months.
Guest Incandenza Posted July 19, 2002 Report Posted July 19, 2002 SK has a gut, but he doesn't approach the levels of fatness that Knowles does (but then so few people do). However, they both have simularly awful--though completely different--hair. And getting back to original point, Scott Keith appears to understand the basic rules of spelling and grammar, whereas Harry Knowles writes like a C-student 8th grader. As if his fawning write-ups of even the lamest of movies that Hollywood spews wasn't bad enough, the pieces themselves border on the incoherent. EDIT: It's been a long time since I've seen a Keith picture, and I've forgotten just how chunky he is. Here's a picture, though a poor quality one:
Guest Human Fly Posted July 19, 2002 Report Posted July 19, 2002 Keith looks like he has a rug in that picture. I don't know what people in the WWE or any other federation think of Keith, but it seems like every interview I read with someone and Knowles comes up they think that Knowles is a piece of garbage. He is such a pathetic shill.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now