SDown does a 3.9 rating

[Guest oldschoolwrestling]

The overnight rating for WWE Smackdown came in at a very low 3.9 with a 7 share, putting UPN in 5th place for the night. While this looks low, the overnight number rarely is a true indicator of the final number, which will be available later today.

 

Credit: 1wrestling.com

 

Remember last week, the final numbers ended up being much lower, meaning this 3.9 could go way down.

[Guest AM The Kid]

I'm going to guess they get a....2.8

[Guest bob_barron]

Who cares about the overnights? They really don't mean anything.

 

And if the rating is wicked low- the WWE needs to quit the hotshotting and build long term storylines that hold fans interest

[Guest Kahran Ramsus]

Actually this looks very good, as it may mean less Steph.

[Guest Raven_Effect01]

Actually this looks very good, as it may mean less Steph.

I sure hope so.

[Guest Shaved Bear]

im calling for a 2.6

[Guest Brian]

The fact that this would be huge news but neither the Torch or Observer has reported it doesn't seem right.

[Guest Vern Gagne]

Actually this looks very good, as it may mean less Steph.

That's wishful thinking

[Guest FeArHaVoC]

Actually this looks very good, as it may mean less Steph.

Yeah, or it could mean more Triple H and Vince. Because, God knows They = Ratings.

[Guest redbaron51]

Actually this looks very good, as it may mean less Steph.

Yeah, or it could mean more Triple H and Vince. Because, God knows They = Ratings.

when you look on the other side of the coin....thats more or less gonna happen

[Guest Spicy McHaggis]

Or it could mean ~NEWSFLASH~ the ratings aren't going up anytime soon until a quality angle is built. Sit back and give them a chance.

[Guest WWF4Life]

Strange...according to Zap2It, SmackDown got a 4.9 rating, unless I'm reading it wrong.

 

"WWE: Smackdown" (4.9/8) continued on UPN at fourth."

 

Now, why would 1wrestling post inaccurate information about WWE?

 

*coughryderandnwatnacough*

[Guest Downhome]

Ummm, you are either confused or trying to make Steph/WWE look worse than they are, lol. The following is from 1wrestling...

 

"WWE Smackdown did a 4.4 with a 7 share, allowing UPN to finish fifth for the night, ahead of only the WB in the Metered Market Overnight rating.

The show did hours of 3.9 and 4.9. They actually finished ahead of WB and FOX for the 9pm hour.

 

Final ratings should be available later today."

 

...there ya go guys!

[Guest Downhome]

By the way, the first hour JUMPED one entire f'n point, so please...

 

...someone just TRY and say that Steph was a "ratings killer" last night.

[Guest BoboBrazil]

The guy on 1wrestling.com changed it. It did say what was posted in the first post.

[Guest Downhome]

The guy on 1wrestling.com changed it. It did say what was posted in the first post.

I guess he was confused and just posted the first hour rating, lol.

[Guest bob_barron]

So now do we believe with 1bob with all the HHH stuff they posted?

[Guest WWF4Life]

So now do we believe with 1bob with all the HHH stuff they posted?

What did 1bob say about HHH? I tend to stay away from the site...

[Guest Jobber of the Week]

I think that in comparison, the SmackDown rating isn't that bad. They're doing about or better what Nitro was doing during the Attitude years, but they're on UPN without all the homes that TNT had.

 

Think about that.

[Guest bob_barron]

That Triple H was bragging about being in booking meeting and stuff

[Guest AM The Kid]

Wow, thats super. DAMN 1W.com...