Guest Vern Gagne Posted July 19, 2002 Report Posted July 19, 2002 These are names I've heard mentioned before.Mitchell is a former Senator.
Guest alkeiper Posted July 19, 2002 Report Posted July 19, 2002 The commissioner is nothing more than the owners' represenative. If I had a choice though, I would go with writer Bill James, of whom I've read more practical solutions than any other writer. Don't think he'd accept it though.
Guest Shaved Bear Posted July 19, 2002 Report Posted July 19, 2002 well Guiliani did a good job pulling a city out of a massive crisis, plus he loves baseball and therefore i feel he can help baseball with the crisis they are in
Guest DrTom Posted July 19, 2002 Report Posted July 19, 2002 I voted for Giuliani, but unless the commissioner is given more authority to act independent of the owners, it wouldn't matter if you installed King Solomon into the post. I like some of Costas' old-school ideas, but I think Rudy G would be more assertive and get more results, even if he only does it by trading on his September 2001 reputation.
Guest Kahran Ramsus Posted July 20, 2002 Report Posted July 20, 2002 They need someone like Jesse Ventura. Fay Vincent's still alive isn't he?
Guest the pinjockey Posted July 20, 2002 Report Posted July 20, 2002 In an ideal world Curt Schilling would be a good choice when he is done. Whenever he talks baseball the ideas he comes up with are usually great but he is such a hardliner when it comes to players union stuff he would not be much different than Selig sadly.
Guest DrTom Posted July 20, 2002 Report Posted July 20, 2002 Fay Vincent's still alive, but he's pretty old, and I'm sure he wouldn't want to go anywhere near that job after the shabby way he got treated by the owners last time. Of course, they probably don't want him back, either, so it's all good.
Guest meanmaisch Posted July 20, 2002 Report Posted July 20, 2002 Hall of Famer and U.S. senator Jim Bunning. He's a former Phillies star ( a plus for me), a passionate baseball man, and best of all, he thinks Bud Selig is doing a shitty job. That works for me.
Guest undisputedjericho Posted July 22, 2002 Report Posted July 22, 2002 Mick Foley What? He's everybody else's answer to 'Commissioner' polls.....
Guest Some Guy Posted July 22, 2002 Report Posted July 22, 2002 Costas is too old school. Rudy is too pro-Yanks. I don't know who Mitchel is. Selig has no speaking skills and that hurts him a lot. He comes across as distant and uncaring when he is not from what I've read. Schilling would be a disaster, he is way too much of a Union guy. The owners would never vote someone in who hates them. Maybe President Bush would be ok after 2008, but who knows?
Guest geniusMoment Posted July 22, 2002 Report Posted July 22, 2002 andy furman- local sports talk host who once promoted a kkk night at a minor league game he has some interesting ideas
Guest Some Guy Posted July 22, 2002 Report Posted July 22, 2002 What exactly did KKK night consist off?
Guest RobJohnstone Posted July 22, 2002 Report Posted July 22, 2002 none of those choices work. How about frank robinson??? Just a thought --Rob
Guest Some Guy Posted July 22, 2002 Report Posted July 22, 2002 Robonson became a Facist dictator when it came to dishing out suspensions last year, so I don't think giving him the comishinership would be all that good. Robonson went nut suspending pitchers for pitching inside, perhaps because he got hit so much becasue he hung way out over the plate? How can one be sure that he wouldn't unfairly treat the owners or players who he doesn't like or agree with?
Guest RobJohnstone Posted July 22, 2002 Report Posted July 22, 2002 good point some guy, it was just a suggestion. I can't really think of a good nominee being that it is such an important decision but I do know this, I wouldn't want anyone on the poll to do it. --Rob
Guest Human Fly Posted July 22, 2002 Report Posted July 22, 2002 andy furman- local sports talk host who once promoted a kkk night at a minor league game he has some interesting ideas Wildman Walker would be better, his first official act as commish. would be too reinstate Pete Rose.
Guest Some Guy Posted July 22, 2002 Report Posted July 22, 2002 I agree. Who is there right now that knows the game well enough and is at least somewhat impartial? Peter Gammons? I don't think so. Jesse Ventura? I don't think he has enough knoweldge of the game. He's more of a Football guy isn't he? Most reporters tend to be very anti-owner and pro-Union. Plus they tend to make enemies with certain players who don't like them. I'd rule out any former player or owner becaue of the inherant biases thay would have. But who's left?
Guest RobJohnstone Posted July 22, 2002 Report Posted July 22, 2002 sen of montana john mccain seems to know his shit. I saw him on PTI talking about baseball. Honestly I wouldn't want to be in the shoes of the people who have to decide this. --Rob
Guest Choken One Posted July 23, 2002 Report Posted July 23, 2002 I remember Conzolezza Rice expressing intrest in the role. However, Rudy ani't going nutin. I'd perfer McCain.
Guest bob_barron Posted July 23, 2002 Report Posted July 23, 2002 John McCain is from Arizona ot Montana. I have no idea who to be commish- just not Selig
Guest Invader3k Posted July 23, 2002 Report Posted July 23, 2002 You need a commisioner to make sure the interests of the game are pursued. And I think Selig is doing a fine job, as he seems genuinely interested in restoring some competitive balance in baseball so it can have the success the NFL is having now.
Guest alkeiper Posted July 23, 2002 Report Posted July 23, 2002 hahaha. That's the funniest thing I've read in days. Persuing the best interests in the game? How about...... -Taking every oppurtunity to claim baseball is in serious financial trouble, diispite indepentant analysis to the contrary. -Threatening cities that unless they build new baseball stadiums, they'll lose their teams. Never mind that money could've gone to education, and never mind that the owners will reap the profits, and never mind that tickets to these new parks will cost more. -Allowing the man who destroyed the Expos the oppurtunity to buy another team which he is currently in the process of running into the ground as well, while leaving the Expos ownerless and still without any kind of television coverage whatsoever. -Introduced the wild card, forever destroying divisional races. -Presided over the biggest All Star Game disgrace in history. -Continously lying to the fans about the game and its finances. -Lying to congress, under oath, about the finances of the game. -Threatening to contract two teams, but refusing to name the two teams, handicapping sales in 5-6 cities. Need a go on? Selig is the absolute worse thing to happen to baseball since the Black Sox scandal. The man is a cancer on professional baseball and needs to be disposed of in the cheapest and most efficient manner. as he seems genuinely interested in restoring some competitive balance in baseball so it can have the success the NFL is having now. Again I ask, what competitive balance problem? If baseball had the same 16 game schedule and single elimination playoff format, then they'd have the same competitive balance the NFL has. When's the last time baseball had a team lose 90% of their games? Football has one about every year. In baseball, the absolute worst team EVER still won 25% of their games. That's a competitive balance problem? In 2000, no team finished over .600 or under .400. The Brewers keep losing? It's not because of the system, its because they suck. Sure, lets make baseball like football. Lets give charity for incompetance. God. If you want baseball to be like football, then go watch football. Baseball will never be football, and that's perfectly ok with me.
Guest JHawk Posted July 24, 2002 Report Posted July 24, 2002 Pete Rose. His first act could be to ban Bud Selig for life plus 10 years. Yeah, I'm joking, but it's still better than Selig
Guest starvenger Posted July 24, 2002 Report Posted July 24, 2002 I vote for Gary Bettman... to keep him the hell away from hockey.
Guest raptor Posted July 25, 2002 Report Posted July 25, 2002 Peter Gammons. We all know that he has a great head for the game, and a creative mind, but he has one bigger qualification. He loves Baseball above all else. When it came down to it, you know he would do what's best for the game.
Guest Some Guy Posted July 25, 2002 Report Posted July 25, 2002 I doubt Gammons would take the job. But he might be a decent choice. Gammons has every Baseball fans dream job, he gets paid to watch, talk, and write about MLB, why would he want the problems of the commisher's office, when he has it made?
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now