Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Guest Mattdotcom

Would Brock Be Over Today....

Recommended Posts

Guest Mattdotcom

Right, since the weekend's topic seems to be The Next Big Thing's lack of Current Big Heat, I thought I'd raise a question that's been bothering me for the last few days.

 

We all know that when Steve Austin walked out, he did so because he was booked to wrestle and presumably job to Brock Lesnar. The question: Would a win over Austin have propelled Brock to the heights of heeldom?

 

I think not.

 

Brock's role was rewritten that night to costing Flair ownership of RAW. No one cared. It was overshadowed. It was barely played up on. Now, the two situations are apples and oranges, but do you think Austin would job clean? Whatever Brock and friends had to do to beat Steve would overshadow the victory.

 

Discuss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cabbageboy

Austin was never going to outright job to Brock, if Brock had won it would have been due to copious Eddie interference. Hell, Regal got a similar win on Austin and how much good did it do him?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest creativename

Agreed. The uber-interference that would have been necessary to beat Austin would have made Lesnar could like a weak jackass.

 

But if the win was semi-clean (i.e., Lesnar using foreign objects on his own but no outside interference or Heyman interference) then it probably would have given Lesnar a decent rub.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Smell the ratings!!!

Of course, Brock can't even beat Test without Heyman interference...

 

The Austin job would have meant nothing, because there would be no buildup or story. "Oh, by the way fans, Brock's fighting Austin in an hour."

 

Which, if I remember right, is what got Austin PO'ed in the first place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest HartFan86

Giving it on free TV with no buildup would have done shit for Brock, if it was build up and put on a big PPV....well, yeah. And, he has to beat him clean, too. Some gay interference win will do shit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault

No. As soon as he sold for Jeff hardy and Stasiak, he was fucked.

 

 

Plus, Austin was right. Giving an unover Brock a win over Austin with no build up is insane

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest bps "The Truth" 21

No.

 

The RAW magazine about Austin's walk out said that Eddy was going to special ref that match...

 

so any heat would have gone on Eddy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Incandenza

No. Anyone who lacks heat will not magically gain it just from pinning one person, no matter how high on the card that person is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Mindless_Aggression

Anglesault said it best, as soon as he sold Matt Hardy and Jeff Hardy's devastating offensive attack of punches, kicks and jumping clotheslines with the occasional Matt Hardy spinny punch mixed in, he was fucked. HE did the same for Stasiak. The same man who got squashed by SPIKE DUDLEY.

 

Austin was right. HE shouldn't have walked out, but Lesnar going over him with no build up to it and no heat for Lesnar was just dumb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Brian

Austin seems to have been right alot, but his methods have to be questioned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest bps "The Truth" 21

If I were in the WWE right now...and I wasn't Taker, HHH, Lesnar...and maybe a couple of other people...

 

I don't know how much I would disagree with Austin's assessment...and his getting the F out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest jester

A lot of people think another Montreal incident was avoided by Austin walking out, and I think they're right. Austin didn't want to cooperate, so if he'd stayed Vince probably would have worked him into a match where he thought one thing was going to happen. but something else entirely takes place.

 

Which begs an interesting question....what would have happened after an Austin screwjob? The rebirth of McMahon as the evil owner, more hated than ever before?

 

jester

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest HartFan86
A lot of people think another Montreal incident was avoided by Austin walking out, and I think they're right. Austin didn't want to cooperate, so if he'd stayed Vince probably would have worked him into a match where he thought one thing was going to happen. but something else entirely takes place.

Exactly. That's the only reason I'm glad Austin left.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest The Man in Blak

Not only would it have not gotten him any heat, but methinks that it would have given Lesnar that wonderful "blue chipper Rocky Maivia" type-heat where nobody even wanted to take him seriously. Austin was one of the top three most over guys in the company when he left, and (as it's been said many times before) having him go over on the fly like that probably would have caused quite a backlash.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×