Guest NaturalBornThriller4:20 Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 Did-anyone-think-Rocky-II-was-better-than-the-original? I-did.
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 Man...you have some odd tastes
Guest bob_barron Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 Eh Rocky II sucks. But I LOVE Rocky III. I think its better than Rocky for some reason I thought Home Alone 2 was better.
Guest bob_barron Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 Another one popped in my head- Toy Story II was amazing and much better than the first one. And the first one rules all as well
Guest NaturalBornThriller4:20 Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 You-thought-Rocky-III-was-better? What-the-Hell-is-wrong-with-you-man? Home-Alone-2-was-eh........
Guest bob_barron Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 Home Alone 2 was great cause it was one of the most violent movies ever. Daniel Stern just gets murdered the whole movie. Great stuff. Rocky III- Paulie breaking the pinball machine Thunderlips! Rocky loses! Rocky and Apollo team up Micky dies And Eye of Tiger. God I love that movie
Guest NaturalBornThriller4:20 Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 Home Alone 2 was great cause it was one of the most violent movies ever. Daniel Stern just gets murdered the whole movie. Great stuff. Rocky III- Paulie breaking the pinball machine Thunderlips! Rocky loses! Rocky and Apollo team up Micky dies And Eye of Tiger. God I love that movie Damn-you,Bob. I'm-starting-to-agree-with-you-on-Rocky-III. Eye-Of-The-Tiger! Daniel-Stern-gets-murdered-in-both-Movies. Home-Alone-3-was-complete-garbage-as-was Urban-Legends:Final-Cut.
Guest Kingpk Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 It's kind of a toss-up between Rush Hour 1 & 2. On the one hand, the first was darker and more "street" like a "Rumble in the Bronx" type movie (which I liked). On the other, Rush Hour 2 was more lighthearted and funny and more like a "Mr. Nice Guy" (which I liked also). I like Back to the Future II more than the first. I didn't like Austin Powers: TSWSM as much probably because of Heather Graham, I just didn't like her character much.
Guest bob_barron Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 Home Alone 3- That movie was an insult to the Home Alones. Some critic called it- HomeAlone1A. In HA2- Daniel Stern gets hit in the head with a brick twice- that's my favourite scene in the movie.
Guest NaturalBornThriller4:20 Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 Who-could-forget-Cruel-Intentions-2? With-the-little-Bastard-from"The-Big-Hit" He-is-without-a-doubt-one-of-the-worst dammed-Actors-ever. Does-anyone-know-who-i'm-talking about? What-was-HA3-about? The-Computer-Chip,right?
Guest MrRant Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 Man... I start the best threads... lol. Cruel Intentions 2 was HORRIBLE. As was Iron Eagle 2.. but the first Iron Eagle ownz.
Guest NaturalBornThriller4:20 Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 What-was-that-Fuckers-name-from-C.I.2? C.I.2? Haha.
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 On a funny side note...I just watched American Psycho 2 today. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Guest J*ingus Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 But since Scream was a self proffessed derivative of other horror films...wouldn't it be those films fault? No, I felt that the makers of Scream considered it to be a satire, which knew better than those stupid ol' 80's horror movies and was superior to them. And then it turned around and made the exact same mistakes that they did. But I'd have to rewrite a 3,000 word research paper to explain exactly why. Although I will admit the 2 killers gimmick was pretty ingenious.
Guest Hitman Jebus Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 The American Pie movies are really close but I like the first one better simply because it was surprising and shocking at the time and it was the movie that singlehandedly brought back the "teens try to get some" genre AP2 felt like deja-vu, same movie as AP1 but with new problems: Stiffler drinks cum now gets peed on (bigger role in the 2nd though...and was hilarious!), Finch same situation (Stiffler's mom), Jim too (still trying with Nadia), Suvari and Klein do NOTHING, and Kevin wants Tara Reid back...just didn't seem original anymore...still funny though Same problem with Home Alone 1 (classic) and 2 (blah!): 1 was cute and original...2 same crap set in New York this time Didn't waste my time with the third HA movie...what were they thinking???
Guest NaturalBornThriller4:20 Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 American-Pyscho-2? Mila-Kunis? HA! What-an-embarrassment! Christian-Bale,Sucka!!!!!!!!
Guest The Man in Blak Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 On a funny side note...I just watched American Psycho 2 today. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Just out of curiosity, is this one also focused on Patrick Bateman, or did they ditch his character (thereby warranting the straight-to-video release)?
Guest NaturalBornThriller4:20 Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 On a funny side note...I just watched American Psycho 2 today. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Just out of curiosity, is this one also focused on Patrick Bateman, or did they ditch his character (thereby warranting the straight-to-video release)? It's-focused-on-one-of-the-Survivors-of-his-Murders.
Guest Hitman Jebus Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 In Cruel Intentions 2, does Sebastian come back from the dead or what?
Guest The Man in Blak Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 No, Cruel Intentions 2 is a very, VERY bad prequel about Sebastian.
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 American Psycho 2 defies all logic...but no it doesn't center on Bateman.
Guest AlwaysPissedOff Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 I personally liked Robocop 2 better than the original. Also Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust.
Guest evenflowDDT Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 American Psycho 2 defies all logic...but no it doesn't center on Bateman. American Psycho 2 had Jackie from "That '70s Show" as the killer, right? Probably the reason it's so bad because, from what I've heard, it was originally supposed to be another movie, but had its opening changed to make it a sequel to American Psycho. I haven't seen it yet though, so I can't judge. Anyway, even though I didn't like either movie, American Pie 2 was more "over the top" than the original, and given that the whole point of that movie is gross-out humor, that makes it better by default, I suppose. While it's not better, Retro Puppetmaster, the 7th entry in the series, is only slightly less enjoyable than the original Puppetmaster (and with a direct-to-video sequel, that's really the best you can hope for sometimes). Most people also think Killjoy 2 is better than Killjoy, but I disagree, because they had a different actor play Killjoy. Gotta throw in my Full Moon love somewhere! How about Terminator 2: Judgment Day? I can't be the only one who likes that one better. And I too, dislike the Scream movies, although probably for a much less intelligent reason than Jingus. I'm interested in what yours is Jingus, as I admire your well-thought out and reasonable arguments. I don't care how long it takes to explain... maybe e-mail or PM it to me if you don't want to post it here? Although I haven't seen it yet (I keep putting it off), has anyone seen Mimic 2? How about Octopus 2? I only found out about USA's "When Animals Attack Week" after it already happened, unless they plan on re-airing any of those flicks anytime soon.
Guest spiny norman Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 Yeah, I was about to bring up Terminator 2. Both are great movies, but T2 is just that slight bit better. Attack Of the Clones. I'm talking as a sequel to Phantom Menace here, not to the original three. It was a big step-up, which was good because I thought it'd be shithouse! I can't really think of any more! Psycho 2 was better then the original, but that's kind of a given. I think Alien was better then Aliens though, and Toy Story better then Toy Story 2, just to disagree with what others have said. Um, yeah. That wraps it up.
Guest EricMM Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 Absolutely Terminator 2, Aliens, umm I think that Mallrats was better than Clerks and Chasing Amy was better than anything else they've done...
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 "Psycho 2 was better then the original, but that's kind of a given" This is either a sick sick joke...or...well...I can't continue without moving this thread to the No Holds Barred folder.
Guest midnight_burn Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 I liked Aliens more than Alien, and i think Terminator 2 is better than T1 as well.
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 Bah. Everyone is sidetracked by the damn special effects. Part 1 was superior.
Guest Daredevil21 Posted July 27, 2002 Report Posted July 27, 2002 As a youngin, I always thought that ROTJ was the best of the trilogy. Now, I think ESB is the best of the original three. Rush Hour 2 is certainly better than the first one. I remember being fairly bored sitting in the theater during the first one, but I was cracking up during the sequel. When I watched it on TV last month, I barely laughed for some reason. Dunno what the deal was, but it was hardly funny at all the second time around for me. American Pie 2 is probably the funnier of the two movies, but I like the basic plot of the original. Yeah, it sounds dumb, but I really like the story of the first one, and there's still some classic moments to be seen. The second one is pretty much all for laughs with a hint of a life lesson tossed in there at the end. Not much point to the movie, just good for a laugh. Nothing wrong with that, although I don't know if I would give the go ahead for a third one. The original Scream is great, and the killer(s) really surprised me when I first saw it. Truly some great stuff in there and not even close to being a slasher flick. The second one IMO, is pretty boring. None of the supporting characters are really worth much, and they all are pretty interchangable, which isn't a good thing. I found myself fairly bored with it since it was more a parody of itself than a clever satire. The killer is pretty obvious throughout the movie, and his motives are really quite lame. The third one is just shit, and really it serves no other purpose than to damage the greatness of the first one. Total mess void of any redeeming qualities. The original Back to the Future is solid, but I too like the sequel better. Michael J. Fox reminds me so much of myself. He's just such a smart ass. I don't think I could dislike anything he does (with the exception of the Stuart Little movies). Haven't seen the third one although I here it's fairly terrible. Can't wait for them to be released on DVD. Home Alone and its sequel are both excellent movies. Adults can enjoy the real humor, kids can enjoy the slapstick humor. Quite the win-win situation there. Can't really say which is better, but I think I'll have to lean slightly in favor of the original, with the second not missing by much. Both movies are ageless classics, and it's a shame that they couldn't leave well be. What were they thinking with the third one? I didn't even go see it. The trailers and the fact that I knew my perception of the Home Alone franchise would have been pretty damaged, kept me from seeing it, even when it came to video. Just to step off topic for a moment... Just out of curiosity, is this one also focused on Patrick Bateman, or did they ditch his character (thereby warranting the straight-to-video release)? Bateman= David Putty of Seinfeld fame, no? Ah, memories. Anyway... I think that Mallrats was better than Clerks and Chasing Amy was better than anything else they've done... I don't think I would count those movies as sequels. Yes, we get several of the same characters in those, but they are about as loose of sequels as you can get, if you do in fact consider them sequels. I just consider them to be three seperate movies that take place in the same location and have some of the same characters. Although it helps to have seen all of those movies (since they make several referances from each other) I still really wouldn't consider Mallrats and Chasing Amy to be sequels.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now