Kane vs Undertaker Feud

[Guest lomasmoney]

I was watching some tapes that i found from 1998 and i realized something. During the entire Kane vs Undertaker feud where it was revealed that the Undertaker killed his parents and disfigured Kane. Now, call me crazy but wouldnt this give Kane perfect reason to want to set the Undertaker on fire and do all sorts of ruthlessly aggresive things to him. Kane should have been the face in the feud the entire time and Taker should have played the heel. Hell, even Paul Bearer had a reason to hate Taker. He tried to kill his son. That would be grounds enough for blackmailing Taker into doing whatever he did for Paul until he got fed up with Paul's shit. Well eventually Kane and Undertaker teamed or whatever and it seems like Kane came to terms with his brother trying to kill him on at least 1 occaision and his brother murdering his parents.

[Guest bob_barron]

Taker was very sorry for what he did, he felt really bad.

 

He wanted to love Kane again he wanted them to be brothers and catch up on old times and get him away from Paul Bearer.

 

Kane wouldn't and kept making Taker's life a living hell and bah gawd lit the dude on fire.

[Guest J*ingus]

Well, they went back & forth about a trillion times in terms of if they were feuding or not, and who was the heel and who was the baby. For example, by Survivor Series '98, Undertaker had clearly become the heel in the feud.

[Guest Ph34r Tha Leaf]

How did you guys like the feud? I thought it was the only "big man" feud I liked. Like...Evar.

[Guest benoitrules2000]

I was a half-mark back then so i rather enjoyed it's rampant stupidity.

[Guest Ph34r Tha Leaf]

I was full-mark. It was bliss.

[Guest The Ruthless Aggressor]

I enjoyed the feud, despite the shear idiocy of it, I even enjoyed the corny stuff like Kane firing his magic bolts into the announce table. But the fued just went on Forever and Ever, and with good reason, why would they stop hating each other? It's a shame the fued was in a time when wrestlers had more realistic characters . When and how could they of realistically ended the feud, though?

[Guest The Electrifyer]

I also liked the feud. I was a huge fan/mark for the Deadman Undertaker and angles like Undertaker/Kane intrigued me. I loved all the fireballs, burning caskets, setting things on fire, even though I knew it was fake.

[Guest Jack Tunney]

I was a half-mark back then so i rather enjoyed it's rampant stupidity.

Yes!!!Someone else is using the "half-mark" term I invented.

[Guest nWoScorpion]

The Ultimate Evil doing: Kane torching his "parents" gravesite. Or was it in back of the arena they were at? lol

[Guest papacita]

I liked the Taker/Kane feud...right up until Undertaker came out with the Dark Side group in the fall of 99. By then, it started getting old. Plus that feud spawned 2 of the funniest WWF quotes that I can remember...

 

Paul Bearer to Jerry Lawler: I had his momma on the floor, and if little Taker had come down those stairs he woulda seen her...1 leg was in New York, and the other leg in LA!"

 

That had me dying for some reason. And then after Taker turned:

 

Paul: (paraphrasing) "Kane...I don't like you anymore, so I'm with Taker now!"

 

JR: BUT HE'S YOUR SON FOR GOD'S SAKE! YOU ROTUND DEMON!!!!!!!

 

...the good old days!