Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest midnight_burn
Posted

Brock Lesnar (2002)

Ken Shamrock (1998)

Guest converge241
Posted

Mabel (1995) v. Brock Lesnar (2002) brock

Ken Shamrock (1998) v. Billy Gunn (1999) shamrock

Guest Austin3164life
Posted

Mabel (1995) v. Brock Lesnar (2002)

Winner: Brock Lesnar (2002)

 

Ken Shamrock (1998) v. Billy Gunn (1999)

Winner: Ken Shamrock (1998)

Guest BionicRedneck
Posted

Well, Lesnar is one of the worst Kings ever. I mean, they don't even mention the fact that he won it, and the tourney itself was completely anti-climatic. That said, Mabel was even worse...

 

Winner:Brock Lesnar

 

Winner:Ken Shamrock (because Rockabilly is completely worthless)

Guest I Fear Hogans Air Guitair
Posted

Lesnar (hard choise)

Shamrock

Guest Midnight Express83
Posted

Lesnar and Shamrock only because I hate Gunn and Mable THAT much more. Plus the King of the ring title of 1995 was a joke.

Guest Your Olympic Hero
Posted

Brock and Shamrock.

 

Mabel was so pitiful. So, so pitiful....

Guest bps "The Truth" 21
Posted

Brock

 

Shamrock

 

 

I think Mabel is the only person I would have put Lesnar over.

Guest Kahran Ramsus
Posted

Come on now. Lesnar is better than Gunn too.

 

Lesnar & Shamrock.

Guest 5_moves_of_doom
Posted

Brock Lesner vs. Mabel

-Brock wins with a F5 at 9:34. Oh God, this was heatless, slow, and nonsensicle. The only time the crowd made any noise was when Brock managed to lift Mabel for the F5, and when it was fucking over. -**1/2

 

Ken Shamrock vs. Billy Gunn

-Ken reverses the Fameasser into an Anklelock for the submission victory at 16:12. Decent enough, with some nice leg psycholigy scattered about. Much better than one would expect, but still nothing great. **3/4

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...