Guest the 1inch punch Report post Posted August 24, 2002 But first, comments about SK, in the NWA Forum -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Probobly not enough Canadians for him SK = Biggest WWE mark on the planet. Even if 99% of the time he ridicules them. I believe he only does that because he knows there's more interest in his columns if he bashes the WWE instead of praising it. He took the last paragraph of Meltzers recap about cutbacks...and threw it in as his opinion. He stated in one of his mail feedback's that he hadn't seen TNA...but suddenly...the cutbacks are hurting his enjoyment? he was way off on the Elvis match IMO. And since the Truth was almost knocked out for the second half of the match...fuck him. Yeah...I guess Albert is better because he can work the WWE style. I haven't cared about SK's rants (AKA his opinions) in quite a while. His artificially-inflated ego and the fact that he regards himself so highly just makes me lose more and more respect for him. Saying that TNA should pull the plug after the 13th show is ridiculous and shows just how jaded he's become. Maybe he should work on getting his 5th rejection letter from WWE since it's obvious he has such a hard-on for them. 'Nuff said. Him calling everyone Indy level workers outside of Styles and Lynn is HILARIOUS. This means Red, The Maximos, Jimmy Yang, and Low fuckin Ki are no better than indy grunts. Scott Keith ladies and gentleman! I really shouldn't be doing this. I mean, he's one of the biggest of heavyweights on the net (heh), with a decade of experience, and legions of followers. Hell, in regards to his WW(F)E writings, I'm one of them most of the time. But this... is wrong. It reeked of bias and negativity. It pissed me off. And you know what that means. but someone who devotes their life to watching and reviewing wrestling..misses it completely.That combined with saying a guy with a concussion couldn't carry the greenest guy on the roster to higher than *1/2 match doesn't belong in the land of Taker and Hogan...tells me pretty much everything I need to know about his recapping ability. Scott Keith Sucks -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Personally, i think all of this is really unfair. face it, I stuck around here when it was Keth's board, only started doing the whole internet thing when i discovered keith, and religously read his rants Just like all of you. so he doesnt like something...DEAL WITH IT so he likes something else......DEAL WITH IT so he doesnt cream over Killings...DEAL WITH IT Rant over Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bob_barron Report post Posted August 24, 2002 That was a short rant Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest dpac Report post Posted August 24, 2002 has keith ever worked for a fed Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest BigTim2002 Report post Posted August 24, 2002 no, but Tommy Fierro has, and look at how many people hate his ass...lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Your Olympic Hero Report post Posted August 25, 2002 Keith, like everyone, has certain wrestlers that he favors, certain feds that he favors, and certain wrestling styles that he favors. He states his opinion in the rants, just like he's supposed to. The choices are simple: if you like his columns, read them. If you don't, then don't waste your time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest the 1inch punch Report post Posted August 25, 2002 Thank You Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest JHawk Report post Posted August 25, 2002 SK is entitled to his opinion, just like I'm entitled to mine. My biggest problem with SK lately though is he seems to half-ass most of his rants, even when he likes a show, and he seems to be unable to give people that aren't his favorites credit when they do well. And this is coming from somebody who shares a lot of the same favorites. Still, if he doesn't like 40 minutes of Jerry Lynn and A.J. Styles goodness, he doesn't have to order the show either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest dreamer420 Report post Posted August 28, 2002 SK = Biggest WWE mark on the planet. Even if 99% of the time he ridicules them. I believe he only does that because he knows there's more interest in his columns if he bashes the WWE instead of praising it. He took the last paragraph of Meltzers recap about cutbacks...and threw it in as his opinion. He stated in one of his mail feedback's that he hadn't seen TNA...but suddenly...the cutbacks are hurting his enjoyment? he was way off on the Elvis match IMO. And since the Truth was almost knocked out for the second half of the match...fuck him. Yeah...I guess Albert is better because he can work the WWE style. I haven't cared about SK's rants (AKA his opinions) in quite a while. His artificially-inflated ego and the fact that he regards himself so highly just makes me lose more and more respect for him. Saying that TNA should pull the plug after the 13th show is ridiculous and shows just how jaded he's become. Maybe he should work on getting his 5th rejection letter from WWE since it's obvious he has such a hard-on for them. 'Nuff said. Him calling everyone Indy level workers outside of Styles and Lynn is HILARIOUS. This means Red, The Maximos, Jimmy Yang, and Low fuckin Ki are no better than indy grunts. Scott Keith ladies and gentleman! I really shouldn't be doing this. I mean, he's one of the biggest of heavyweights on the net (heh), with a decade of experience, and legions of followers. Hell, in regards to his WW(F)E writings, I'm one of them most of the time. But this... is wrong. It reeked of bias and negativity. It pissed me off. And you know what that means. but someone who devotes their life to watching and reviewing wrestling..misses it completely.That combined with saying a guy with a concussion couldn't carry the greenest guy on the roster to higher than *1/2 match doesn't belong in the land of Taker and Hogan...tells me pretty much everything I need to know about his recapping ability. Scott Keith Sucks -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- agreed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Jobber of the Week Report post Posted August 28, 2002 You're not obligated or forced to agree with him. I remember an explination for his snowflakes that said "One man's DUD is another man's Match of the Year candidate." That pretty much sums it up right there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest dreamer420 Report post Posted August 28, 2002 I do agree with him though. I used to be a huge fan of Scott Keith's writing but something changed him into a major whiner. He makes it seem like it's such a big chore for him to do a review, when I think he should give it up all together if his heart isn't in it anymore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
