How the title controversy can't be handled

[JasonX 0]

New World Title: Won't work and will be considered a laughing stock by fans both mark and smark (as seen the last time a bastard version of the World Title was created in 1993 in WCW). Even if it's given to RVD, the thing will be a huge joke because know that HHH and UT would never do clean jobs to put RVD over or associate with what would amount to be a paper title and RVD has zero oppenents for him to fight with.

 

Eric Unifies the Belt and reclaims the WCW Title as the Raw championship belt: Would only work if Bisch gives the belt to Booker T or Chris Jericho (the last two legitamite holders of the belt) and if they actually make fans care about the belt as opposed to simply bringing it back and not giving a f#ck to make people care about the title. And then you have the problem of having of HHH and UT using their stroke to make them the ones who feud over the title as opposed to using it to elevate Jericho or Booker T.

 

IC Title promoted to top title spot: Another huge mistake. The IC title means jack shit and given how nearly all of the guys who have been associated with the IC belt (Angle, Eddy G, and Benoit) are stuck on SD, who's going to bother fighting RVD for the belt? Jericho is the only guy and even they can't elevate that piece of junk belt to top status. Especially when you'll be having UT and HHH bitching like little girls on Raw about how they want to wrestle for the "Real" top title and not the IC belt.

 

The only possible solution to the problem is to have Steph's revelation about Brock being bribed to not appear on Raw either overturned by Vince or have Eric use a deux de machina plot device to get Brock to appear on Raw. Elevating the IC belt/reviving the WCW Title/Creating a new belt only makes things WORSE for the WWE.

[Guest art_vandelay]

I think we should all just shut up about what we think will happen and just let the angle play out itself.

[Guest Nevermortal]

I honestly think that this will lead to a dispute in the Undisputed Title.

 

Or Bischoff's going to have to wait til Rumble so a Raw guy can win it and go onto to Mania to bring it back to Raw. But who knows how long Bischoff's going to last?

[JasonX 0]

Or Bischoff's going to have to wait til Rumble so a Raw guy can win it and go onto to Mania to bring it back to Raw. But who knows how long Bischoff's going to last?

 

That will be horrible too, given how it will keep Raw the weak and impotent show even more than it already is, especially with UT and HHH on Raw monopolizing the upper card for just the two of them...

[Guest oldschoolwrestling]

I think we should all just shut up about what we think will happen and just let the angle play out itself.

Yeah, so everybody log off the net!!!

[Guest mister foozel]

I think we should all just shut up about what we think will happen and just let the angle play out itself.

finally someone who may not be smart at all but probably is smarter than the people who sit here and argue about crap like this for an hour,

 

has said the only smart thing i've heard on this internet wrestling forum in a long time.

[Guest mister foozel]

I honestly think that this will lead to a dispute in the Undisputed Title.

 

Or Bischoff's going to have to wait til Rumble so a Raw guy can win it and go onto to Mania to bring it back to Raw. But who knows how long Bischoff's going to last?

yeah cause didnt undisputed mean that the wwf and wcw titles were unified already,

 

and to un-unify would mean to have a disputed title,

 

because wwf and wcw both always had their respective champions(along with ecw but i guess that didnt count in this case), which means there was always dispute on who was the real world champion of wrestling until their was the word title unifying match,

 

ex:booker T wcw champ, austin wwf champ, whos the real WORLD champ of all wrestling between the two until they are unified?

 

i just want the title to be called wwf title again instead of undisputed along iwth that too because this is not boxing its wrestling and the whole undisputed thing has been used way too much

 

bischoff could always bring the ecw title back though, since that is the only title that hasant been unified yet

 

in which case i believe it would go to rhyno?

[Guest dreamer420]

it sucks that the wwe has gotten rid of the hardcore title, especially now that the title seemed to be going places. tommy dreamer could have been the person to put some heat back into the hardcore belt. i have no idea why they decided to get rid of it, other than they are finally starting to listen to the smarks. may god have mercy on our souls.

[Guest BigTim2002]

Hey, I just got a question...since RVD is now champ, does that technically make him a 5-Crown Champion? Since the belt is made up of all the previous belts?

[Guest HossSauce]

You can't bring back the WCW world title because it was unified with the WWF title to make the undisputed WWE title.

[Guest Jobber of the Week]

New World Title: Won't work and will be considered a laughing stock by fans both mark and smark (as seen the last time a bastard version of the World Title was created in 1993 in WCW). Even if it's given to RVD, the thing will be a huge joke because know that HHH and UT would never do clean jobs to put RVD over or associate with what would amount to be a paper title and RVD has zero oppenents for him to fight with.

How about a new world title who's holder fights the SD title holder on PPV? That would make them effectively equal.

[Guest candie45]

I think we should all just shut up about what we think will happen and just let the angle play out itself.

finally someone who may not be smart at all but probably is smarter than the people who sit here and argue about crap like this for an hour,

 

has said the only smart thing i've heard on this internet wrestling forum in a long time.

What the fuck are we supposed to do on a forum then... stare at the boards while twiddling our thumbs and singing Christmas carols?

 

What's funny is that you replied a post later with what you thought of the "crap" being discussed.