Guest Youth N Asia Posted August 28, 2002 Report Posted August 28, 2002 Just seeing what that smarks prefer
Guest Grenouille Posted August 28, 2002 Report Posted August 28, 2002 When I first started buying DVDs Widescreen did annoy me quite a bit, but by now it's just normal and doesn't really matter.
Guest Youth N Asia Posted August 28, 2002 Report Posted August 28, 2002 Unless you're working on just a tiny tv I'd much rather have widescreen...I just like it better, can't explain really
Guest El Psycho Diablo Posted August 28, 2002 Report Posted August 28, 2002 Considering I now have the Giant TV Widescreen. Never could stand the fullscreen versions, particuarly on movies.
Guest Karnage Posted August 28, 2002 Report Posted August 28, 2002 Widescreen because when I check some fullscreen to widescreen comparisons, the pan and scan versions cut so much out. People are finally liking widescreen. I saw the original POTA on Space Channel and Hard Boiled on Showcase in wide.
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Posted August 28, 2002 Report Posted August 28, 2002 It has to be wide screen Full Screen leads to annoying panning... and you miss like 1/3 of the movie.
Guest Choken One Posted August 28, 2002 Report Posted August 28, 2002 Movies/TV Shows-Wide Screen Sports-Full Screen...
Guest El Satanico Posted August 28, 2002 Report Posted August 28, 2002 People are finally liking widescreen. I saw the original POTA on Space Channel Space Channel?
Guest Karnage Posted August 28, 2002 Report Posted August 28, 2002 People are finally liking widescreen. I saw the original POTA on Space Channel Space Channel? Umm...Canada's answer to the Sci-Fi Network.
Guest Lethargic Posted August 28, 2002 Report Posted August 28, 2002 I certainly hope that the people that vote for "fullscreen" or "it doesn't matter" are going to be drug out and shot.
Guest Youth N Asia Posted August 28, 2002 Report Posted August 28, 2002 I certainly hope that the people that vote for "fullscreen" or "it doesn't matter" are going to be drug out and shot. A little drastic maybe?...
Guest Some Guy Posted August 28, 2002 Report Posted August 28, 2002 Widescreen because I like to put the subtitles on and it doesn't interfere with the picture.
Guest godthedog Posted August 28, 2002 Report Posted August 28, 2002 Unless you're working on just a tiny tv I'd much rather have widescreen...I just like it better, can't explain really maybe because it allows you to see the whole shot of a movie?
Guest Incandenza Posted August 28, 2002 Report Posted August 28, 2002 Thank you, DVD, for giving the widescreen format wider popularity. I worked at a Blockbuster for a time back in '97, and I wanted to strangle any person who said "I don't like letterbox cuz I want to see the whole movie." Man, I hated that fucking place.
Guest J*ingus Posted August 29, 2002 Report Posted August 29, 2002 Widescreen in general, it's a pain to watch the picture pan back & forth, but sometimes it really doesn't matter. Some movies are shot with an aspect ratio so close to that of a normal TV screen that there's basically no change. And some directors (Stanley Kubrick and Woody Allen, among others) often frame their shots with fullscreen in mind, and sometimes you're actually seeing more in the fullscreen version than in widescreen. (Whenever you catch a glimpse of a boom mike on home video, nine times out of ten that's the reason why.)
Guest MarvinisaLunatic Posted August 29, 2002 Report Posted August 29, 2002 Um. It really sucks doing widescreen on my computer's 15 in. monitor, but I like it on the 25 in. tv. Im betting that 25 in. is about the smallest tv that widescreen will look good on. I think they should go back to giving you 1 side with the widescreen and 1 side with standard pan and scan.
Guest evenflowDDT Posted August 29, 2002 Report Posted August 29, 2002 I've got no problems with watching widescreen on my 19-inch TV. I used to notice the difference between widescreen but still liked it better because now it looked more "natural". Now I don't even notice it. The only stuff that I'll "excuse" watching in full-screen is shot on video and/or TV stuff, because (especially for TV) that's their only option.
Guest evenflowDDT Posted August 29, 2002 Report Posted August 29, 2002 I think they should go back to giving you 1 side with the widescreen and 1 side with standard pan and scan. I didn't like this because I'm extremely careful with my DVDs like I am with my CDs, and if there's a double-sided DVD, I'll get REALLY paranoid about scratches, especially since they'd usually put the widescreen on "Side B", which is the side that's more likely to get scratched when handling.
Guest Max Danger Posted August 29, 2002 Report Posted August 29, 2002 The only stuff that I'll "excuse" watching in full-screen is shot on video and/or TV stuff, because (especially for TV) that's their only option. Angel is in widescreen, and Joss Whedon wanted Firefly to be so, too, but Fox didn't think people would want that. I know are a few other shows in widescreen... but can't think of 'em at the moment.
Guest Kahran Ramsus Posted August 29, 2002 Report Posted August 29, 2002 I want to see what the director intended. For most movies that means widescreen, but some older stuff (ex. Citizen Kane) were shot in fullscreen. Pan & Scan is a travesty.
Guest Karnage Posted August 29, 2002 Report Posted August 29, 2002 I want to see what the director intended. For most movies that means widescreen, but some older stuff (ex. Citizen Kane) were shot in fullscreen. Pan & Scan is a travesty. Most of the movies in the 40s and before were all 1.33:1 before television had the same aspect ratio and theatres tried to get more people to go to the movies so they had a wider aspect ratio. I can't really explain it but thedigitalbits.com's guide to widescreen will.
Guest areacode212 Posted August 29, 2002 Report Posted August 29, 2002 The only stuff that I'll "excuse" watching in full-screen is shot on video and/or TV stuff, because (especially for TV) that's their only option. Angel is in widescreen, and Joss Whedon wanted Firefly to be so, too, but Fox didn't think people would want that. I know are a few other shows in widescreen... but can't think of 'em at the moment. Enterprise is also in widescreen. Fox are idiots. Why wouldn't people want it, especially in a show that, if successful, will likely end up on DVD? Angel looks awesome in widescreen because of its somewhat cinematic feel.
Guest eiker_ir Posted August 29, 2002 Report Posted August 29, 2002 i just can's stand pan & scan movies....and whenever i heard someone say something like "widescreen sucks, they cut the top and bottom of the screen" or something like that i try to expalin to them why it's the correct way and everythin but there are some people that simply don't understand and all i want a those cases is to shoot them....
Guest C.H.U.D. Posted August 29, 2002 Report Posted August 29, 2002 Widescreen without a second thought. Sorry, but anyone who prefers fullscreen over widescreen is an idiot.
Guest Dmann2000 Posted August 29, 2002 Report Posted August 29, 2002 I want to see what the director intended. For most movies that means widescreen, but some older stuff (ex. Citizen Kane) were shot in fullscreen. Pan & Scan is a travesty. Most of the movies in the 40s and before were all 1.33:1 before television had the same aspect ratio and theatres tried to get more people to go to the movies so they had a wider aspect ratio. Yeah it's funny to read some DVD-o-phile's who don't know what they're talking about complain when a film like Casablanca or Gone with the Wind isn't available in widescreen
Guest kkktookmybabyaway Posted August 29, 2002 Report Posted August 29, 2002 Widescreen all the way. When my mom visited a few months ago I popped in Crimson Tide and she said "Oh, this has the black bars on it?" Grrrrr....
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now