Guest jester Posted September 6, 2002 Report Posted September 6, 2002 I flipped back and forth between Smackdown, because it was pretty boring, but I am pretty sure they never mentioned the new Raw HHHeavyweight belt. Did they mention it and I just didn't notice? ANd if they didn't, does that seem right? They should have said something, if only to slam the belt they had to create to replace the one Steph stole. Of course, anything they said about the belt that was negative would probably be an unintentional shoot comment.
Guest Mole Posted September 6, 2002 Report Posted September 6, 2002 Got me, Smackdown wasn't on, football was. Go Niners...
LaParkaYourCar Posted September 6, 2002 Report Posted September 6, 2002 No they never mentioned the belt. I think it's better that way. Ignore the belt and act like it doesn't exist is better than getting worked up over it. It makes HHH and his fake belt seem unimportant.
Guest art_vandelay Posted September 6, 2002 Report Posted September 6, 2002 I agree, they shouldn't even acknowledge anything that goes on on the other shows.
Guest jester Posted September 6, 2002 Report Posted September 6, 2002 I'd ignore it if a wrestler I liked wasn't getting into a feud with HHH. I think they're presenting it as a serious belt that wrestlers want to win. Bad idea. If they were presenting it as solely an HHH ego thing (Like Dibiase's Million Dollar Belt), that would be better.
Guest Mad Dog Posted September 6, 2002 Report Posted September 6, 2002 For once I can say that they actually did the right thing. But I didn't really watch. Football is more important.
Guest Combat Apparatus Posted September 6, 2002 Report Posted September 6, 2002 Knowing the WWE writing staff, they probably forgot about the belt already.
Guest DJ Jeff Posted September 6, 2002 Report Posted September 6, 2002 I never did watch Smackdown so I wouldn't know. Anyways, I think it's better that there's no mention of Smackdown on RAW and vice versa. After all, the idea of this whole split was to seperate both shows entirely. At least, I think that was the idea.
Guest RavishingRickRudo Posted September 6, 2002 Report Posted September 6, 2002 They called the undisputed belt the world belt. I believe that's acknowledging it.
Guest DJ Jeff Posted September 6, 2002 Report Posted September 6, 2002 Why didn't the WWE just leave the WWE Undisputed Title floating between both RAW and Smackdown. That was the better thing to do, and it was less confusing. This is why the split has to end, so there's only one WWE Champion. Hey, we just went this route. Well, except there was no split.
Guest Redhawk Posted September 6, 2002 Report Posted September 6, 2002 On a similar note, I don't believe the RAW announcers ever mentioned that Undertaker had jumped to Smackdown. Does anyone recall if they did?
Guest dreamer420 Posted September 6, 2002 Report Posted September 6, 2002 and kayfabe returns to wrestling. welcome back.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now