Guest jester Report post Posted September 6, 2002 I flipped back and forth between Smackdown, because it was pretty boring, but I am pretty sure they never mentioned the new Raw HHHeavyweight belt. Did they mention it and I just didn't notice? ANd if they didn't, does that seem right? They should have said something, if only to slam the belt they had to create to replace the one Steph stole. Of course, anything they said about the belt that was negative would probably be an unintentional shoot comment. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mole Report post Posted September 6, 2002 Got me, Smackdown wasn't on, football was. Go Niners... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaParkaYourCar 0 Report post Posted September 6, 2002 No they never mentioned the belt. I think it's better that way. Ignore the belt and act like it doesn't exist is better than getting worked up over it. It makes HHH and his fake belt seem unimportant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest art_vandelay Report post Posted September 6, 2002 I agree, they shouldn't even acknowledge anything that goes on on the other shows. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest jester Report post Posted September 6, 2002 I'd ignore it if a wrestler I liked wasn't getting into a feud with HHH. I think they're presenting it as a serious belt that wrestlers want to win. Bad idea. If they were presenting it as solely an HHH ego thing (Like Dibiase's Million Dollar Belt), that would be better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mad Dog Report post Posted September 6, 2002 For once I can say that they actually did the right thing. But I didn't really watch. Football is more important. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Combat Apparatus Report post Posted September 6, 2002 Knowing the WWE writing staff, they probably forgot about the belt already. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest DJ Jeff Report post Posted September 6, 2002 I never did watch Smackdown so I wouldn't know. Anyways, I think it's better that there's no mention of Smackdown on RAW and vice versa. After all, the idea of this whole split was to seperate both shows entirely. At least, I think that was the idea. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest RavishingRickRudo Report post Posted September 6, 2002 They called the undisputed belt the world belt. I believe that's acknowledging it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest DJ Jeff Report post Posted September 6, 2002 Why didn't the WWE just leave the WWE Undisputed Title floating between both RAW and Smackdown. That was the better thing to do, and it was less confusing. This is why the split has to end, so there's only one WWE Champion. Hey, we just went this route. Well, except there was no split. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Redhawk Report post Posted September 6, 2002 On a similar note, I don't believe the RAW announcers ever mentioned that Undertaker had jumped to Smackdown. Does anyone recall if they did? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest dreamer420 Report post Posted September 6, 2002 and kayfabe returns to wrestling. welcome back. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
