Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Guest Vern Gagne

English Members

Recommended Posts

Guest Vern Gagne

Do the Conservatives over there support Tony Blair when it comes to Iraq. Since it would seem they would be more alligned with a Republican U.S. President, or does party politics get in the way like it would here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Mystery Eskimo

Well, the thing is, party politics in this country is pretty well fucked because the conservatives have no credibility and Blair pretty much does what the hell he wants.

 

But, to answer your question, they are in support of an attack on Iraq. If you want their leader's (Iain Duncan-Smith. No ones heard of him here, either) opinion try this:

 

 

[url=http://www.conservatives.com/news/show_article.cfm?obj_id=37954]http://www.conservatives.com/news/show_art...fm?obj_id=37954[/url]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest DeputyHawk

the conservatives seem to be more supportive of blair than his own labour party is. u.k. politics is a joke right now, the socialist labour party are leaning more and more to the right, the conservatives moving increasingly to the left, no one seeming to have any clue where their ideologies and/or policies should lie anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Some Guy

Didn't Thatcher basically cause the Labour party to centralize more from their Socialist platform because of her popularity in the 80s? Then Blair came around and actually did the centralizing, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Mystery Eskimo

Pretty much. Now the Tories are centralising too though. Its all very silly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Some Guy

So are they trying to make both parties exactly the same? Or just bring them closer together like Dems and Republican in America?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Cancer Marney

!!!

 

The Democrats and the Republicans are not coming closer together. Heaven forbid. I like having at least one halfway decent party on the front lines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Some Guy

Marney I meant closer together in comparison to the very Socialist Labour Party of the 80s and before and the Thatcher led Conservative party. I'm aware that the Dems are moving further left, but at the same time the GOP is centralizing on more and more issues, it won't be long before the GOP starts getting some more Pro-Choicers in office. The GOP and Dems really aren;t that far apart on most issues, while the labour and Conservative party were miles apart on almost everything a decade or so ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Cancer Marney

Okay, I guess that's fair enough. There are miles and miles between us and the Democrats on procedure, backing, and ethics, though. Last I checked the GOP wasn't a wholly owned subsidiary of the unions, and lying about liberals hadn't become not only an accepted but an institutionalised practice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Some Guy

I didn't the that people from the parties were close together, just most of the issues. Most Dems are liars and cheaters, while most GOP members aren't. There are obviously some exceptions to the rule, though, Carter and Nixon come to mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Cancer Marney

Carter is just an idiot. I don't think he has enough brains to lie. I'm still amazed that Yasser Arafat's would-be speechwriter was ever elected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Some Guy

But he was not a liar, he is by most accounts a very honest and charitable guy, where as Nixon was not. I just used them as two well known names who were exceptions to the rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Mystery Eskimo
So are they trying to make both parties exactly the same? Or just bring them closer together like Dems and Republican in America?

Well...they're not really *trying* to bring them together. Its just kinda happening. Blair make a sprint for the middle ground as soon as he became leader of the Labour party whilst in opposition.

 

Now the tories are moving leftish as well, which is a bit odd because I think there are still more conservatives than liberals in this country.

 

It would have been interesting if the leader of the labour party before Blair, a very fine man named John Smith, had not died of a heart attack.

 

It was believed he could have been prime minister.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Rob Edwards

If anyone can name me more than a few differences in policy the two parties have I'd be very impressed. I actually chose not to vote in the last election as I thought both manifesto's were as crap as each other

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Mystery Eskimo

Labour are in favour of EMU. Tories aren't.

 

That's the only really definite one I can think of off the top of my head.

 

I'm going to vote LibDem next time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest WhenDanSaysJump

I wanna vote Natural Law. They are going to save Britain with YOGIC FLYING~!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Mystery Eskimo

They were great. They're policy on everything was said YOGIC FLYING~!

Unemployment? Pollution? Racism? Do some YOGIC FLYING~!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Rob Edwards

Yeah but you could never beat the Monster Raving Loony Party

 

RIP Screaming Lord Sutch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×