ChrisMWaters Posted September 24, 2002 Report Posted September 24, 2002 1985? Is Steph only 17? That, cant be right Steph is in her 20s...somewhere there. And in 1985, she played a young Trick-Or-Treater in a "Rowdy" Roddy Piper skit.
Guest BobbyBacklund Posted September 24, 2002 Report Posted September 24, 2002 Shane may not count, since he is adopted..
Guest Trivia247 Posted September 24, 2002 Report Posted September 24, 2002 Steph is like 26 or 27 me I would have been 7 in 1985 she would be what, 10-11
ChrisMWaters Posted September 24, 2002 Report Posted September 24, 2002 Shane CAN'T be adopted. He looks too damn much like a younger version of his father. Remember how similar to two halves of the face on the InVasion poster looked?
Guest The Czech Republic Posted September 25, 2002 Report Posted September 25, 2002 There's NO way Shane is adopted. There's no way Vince would adopt. He'd much rather create his own successor from his fruitful loins than adopt. Come on.
Guest BaldFish Posted September 26, 2002 Report Posted September 26, 2002 Yeah, I kind of hope this whole "blue chipper" thing blows up in their faces...AGAIN! Although I would like to see more stars made out of younger guys. But I really thought that they should have brought in Batista instead of ORTON. I mean, C'MON! !!! That's quite obviously WHY they're trying to push him as "The Blue Chipper", as "The Third-Generation Star", etc. They're trying to make him into a second Rock, basically--overpush him, make the crowd hate him, turn him heel. Whether or not he gets over as a face afterward is irrelevant--I'm sure they HOPE he can be their new Rock... But the problem is this: heel Rock was done accidentally. When the WWE tries to build a star, they frequently fuck it up. Bye-bye, Mr. Orton.
Guest AndrewTS Posted September 26, 2002 Report Posted September 26, 2002 Yeah, I kind of hope this whole "blue chipper" thing blows up in their faces...AGAIN! Although I would like to see more stars made out of younger guys. But I really thought that they should have brought in Batista instead of ORTON. I mean, C'MON! !!! That's quite obviously WHY they're trying to push him as "The Blue Chipper", as "The Third-Generation Star", etc. They're trying to make him into a second Rock, basically--overpush him, make the crowd hate him, turn him heel. Whether or not he gets over as a face afterward is irrelevant--I'm sure they HOPE he can be their new Rock... But the problem is this: heel Rock was done accidentally. When the WWE tries to build a star, they frequently fuck it up. Bye-bye, Mr. Orton. If so, they better be damn certain that Orton has the charisma to pull it off. Otherwise he'll go absolutely no where.
Guest The Czech Republic Posted September 26, 2002 Report Posted September 26, 2002 That's quite obviously WHY they're trying to push him as "The Blue Chipper", as "The Third-Generation Star", etc. They're trying to make him into a second Rock, basically--overpush him, make the crowd hate him, turn him heel. There's no way they can re-do the entire Rock evolution with Randy Orton. I have a feeling Randy is going to get a career-ending injury within two years from now and that'll be the end of the "O-Zone" or whatever they're calling him. He sucks.
Guest RickyChosyu Posted September 26, 2002 Report Posted September 26, 2002 Rock's tranformation was purely accidental and he went through a period of being a total waste of space and a heet killer wherever he went before getting over with the gimick. The Blue Chipper sucked the first time, and it certainly will now.
Guest BobbyBacklund Posted September 27, 2002 Report Posted September 27, 2002 A little late, but right in the beginning of an episode of OTR, he said and I quote: "Before we start this interview, I would just like to point out that I'm adopted." Steph - "Shane, Don't--" Shane - "It's okay. I'm adopted, and I just thought that theyh should know." Ookay, the last part is by memory, but the rest is true. I too was surprised because they really DO look so damn alike...
Guest BobbyBacklund Posted September 27, 2002 Report Posted September 27, 2002 That was in reference to others who didn't believe me when I said that Shane was adopted. Sorry, I suppose I didn't make it clear enough. My bad.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now