Guest Anglesault Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 I don't think Kane deserves a title shot either. Who does: A certain 5-time WCW Champion I have to disagree with you there. Kane has busted his ass for years in the WWE and has only had the belt once, for one day. Hell, you gotta throw him a bone sooner or later. That would be true, but he has bad matches on a regular basis. You shouldn't be rewarded for that.
Guest CanadianChick Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 I'm not doubting he gets pops, but Booker is still much more over than Kane. Listen and compare. I am not saying that Kane is heatless, cause I know he's not. But did you hear the crowd during his match with Jericho? Jericho was the heel and was getting cheered over Kane. That tells me something.
Guest Brian Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 Yeah, I'm expecting Eddie turning too.
Guest Austin420 Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 I'm not doubting he gets pops, but Booker is still much more over than Kane. Listen and compare. I am not saying that Kane is heatless, cause I know he's not. But did you hear the crowd during his match with Jericho? Jericho was the heel and was getting cheered over Kane. That tells me something. That's true, but an unfair comparison. Jericho is so over with the fans it's ridiculious. It doesn't matter who Jericho wrestles he always gets the loudest pops compared to his opponent. I think we are both bringing up some pretty valid points, but right now it's looking to be Kane's time. Sooner or later Booker will get his too. And Anglesault, HHH has ALOT of bad matches too and he always is up for the belt.
Guest alfdogg Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 And Anglesault, HHH has ALOT of bad matches too and he always is up for the belt. ::tries to resist the urge to post the "Master of the Obvious" picture::
Guest El Psycho Diablo Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 Kane isn't sleeping with the Boss, either. Let's see.. _ Lesnar _ Taker _ HHH _ Bubba Dudley. Three out of the four, eh? If any of those guys main event a PPV, I'm not ordering the damn thing.
Guest CanadianChick Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 That's true, but an unfair comparison. Jericho is so over with the fans it's ridiculious. It doesn't matter who Jericho wrestles he always gets the loudest pops compared to his opponent. Yeah, but usually against faces, Jericho gets heat, not pops. The crowd usually cheers for the face because Jericho is getting so much heat.
Guest Anglesault Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 And Anglesault, HHH has ALOT of bad matches too and he always is up for the belt. Thank You for letting me know that. Because as you all know, I had no idea.
Guest SP-1 Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 I suspect that Eddy is getting ready to turn soon, too. Why? Did anyone else notice how out of character for Smackdown! it was to keep the cameras rolling post-match just to get the audience's reaction after Edge left? A reaction thatwas clearly respectful towards Eddy's (the heel's) efforts in what was really a great match? It'd be incredibly stupid for WWE to do that without them setting up a turn of some kind. Not to mention . . . the big lug in me was kind of touched by that whole thing. That, my friends, was a genuine smile on Eddy's exhausted features.
Guest godthedog Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 i just can't see eddie as a face. eddie's said himself in interviews that he's not comfortable as a face.
Guest Austin420 Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 And Anglesault, HHH has ALOT of bad matches too and he always is up for the belt. Thank You for letting me know that. Because as you all know, I had no idea. I wasn't being a smartass. I just pointing out the fact that just because you put on shitty matches doesn't mean you don't deserve the gold.
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 "I still don't know why Kane gets the title shot. Obviously that "red hot" RVD/Flair feud THAT WASN'T even mentioned last night couldn't be ended so HHH could put Rob over, but we get THIS Monstrosity? " The harsh truth contained in this line makes me weep.
Guest Anglesault Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 And Anglesault, HHH has ALOT of bad matches too and he always is up for the belt. Thank You for letting me know that. Because as you all know, I had no idea. I wasn't being a smartass. I just pointing out the fact that just because you put on shitty matches doesn't mean you don't deserve the gold. Trips is champ because he's banging Stephio (Stephio, Stephio, JOB HIM OUT!) and he used to not suck. On what grounds does Kane deserve gold?
Guest CanadianChick Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 This is what happens when you stack one show with most of the talented people.
Guest BifEverchad Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 So by the Stephanie/Triple H rational.....if Shane-O-Mac was bangin' Trish, would she be holding down Victoria, Jazz, Lita, Molly, etc like Trips is doing to Jericho, Angle and friends?
Guest Anglesault Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 This is what happens when you stack one show with most of the talented people. Chick (BTW, you are scheduled to turn on Spoon any day now) are you trying to insinuate that kane isn't talented? Perish the thought!
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 I'd just like to point out that fans cared alot more about RVD vs. Bubba back in the hardcore title days than tehy did about Bubba vs. HHH for the "World" title. Take it as a comment on HHH. Take it as a comment on the worth of the title. Take it as more evidence that RVD should be champion of RAW to make people interested in any match they throw him in. Just take it.
Guest Anglesault Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 So by the Stephanie/Triple H rational.....if Shane-O-Mac was bangin' Trish, would she be holding down Victoria, Jazz, Lita, Molly, etc like Trips is doing to Jericho, Angle and friends? I think Shane may be a closeted gay. That's the vibe I get off of him. And that's my random thought of the day. ®
Guest Austin420 Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 On what grounds does Kane deserve gold? Kane is big, agile, and like I said before he has been busting his ass for Vinnie Mac for about 10 years or so now. His ring work is not that bad. He just does the same moves in every match, just like everyone else in the WWE. He has a much a right to the belt as HHH, Rock, Taker, or anyone else with senority in the WWE. Once again this is IMO, so I won't be led into an argument. I am just stating my opinion.
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 If those were reasons I could go with it. BUT the only reason that he's getting the shot is because the Bubba push bombed, HHH doesn't want to drop to RVD and he owes HHH a job. Period. So screw that.
Guest CanadianChick Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 (BTW, you are scheduled to turn on Spoon any day now) Um....I don't get it...
Guest Anglesault Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 . Kane is big, agile, Ahh, yes, the "he's big, so you HAVE to give him the belt." excuse. and like I said before he has been busting his ass for Vinnie Mac for about 10 years or so now So has Steve Lombardi His ring work is not that bad. Yes it is. He just does the same moves in every match, just like everyone else in the WWE. But all three of his moves suck! He has a much a right to the belt as HHH, Rock, Taker, or anyone else with senority in the WWE Seniority means jackshit.
Guest Anglesault Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 QUOTE (Anglesault @ Oct 2 2002, 02:55 AM) (BTW, you are scheduled to turn on Spoon any day now) Um....I don't get it... I pinned Spoon (Then known as Kotzenjunge) last month to win your services for a month. Like a good wrestling cliche, you should turn.
Guest Austin420 Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 . Kane is big, agile, Ahh, yes, the "he's big, so you HAVE to give him the belt." excuse. and like I said before he has been busting his ass for Vinnie Mac for about 10 years or so now So has Steve Lombardi His ring work is not that bad. Yes it is. He just does the same moves in every match, just like everyone else in the WWE. But all three of his moves suck! He has a much a right to the belt as HHH, Rock, Taker, or anyone else with senority in the WWE Seniority means jackshit. Just because we disagree doesn't mean you have to pitch a hissy fit. Take a valium dude. This is just a wrestling board. People disagee all the time. That's your opinion, fine I respect that. Like I said before I want be duped into an argument. I have stated my opinion and you have stated yours. By the way, in the world of business seniority means a whole lot.
Guest CanadianChick Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 lol....I get it. Anyways, on to Kane and how he deserves to hold the belt as HHH, Taker, ect. The thing is those two don't really deserve the title either so in my eyes, that part of your arguement is shot.
Guest Anglesault Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 That was not a hissy fit. if you stay on this board long enough, you are sure to see an Anglesault hissyfit.
Guest El Psycho Diablo Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 Feh. In wrestling, it means crap. Look at Brock Lesnar. He's done absolutely nothing to deserve A belt, much less the World Title. And he's only been in the company six months. Explain that, if you will? Senority in wrestling is only something that the Undertaker spouts to keep him from jobbing, or that they use for keeping Bob Holly around. The only thing that matters in wrestling is is you're physically big, have some political pull, or are one of "JR's Boys".
Guest bob_barron Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 Ummm you stated your opinion and AS disagreed with you and you now are like debating and trying to get your points across. I like Kane too but he's best as Hot Tag. You know- he stands on the apron, claps his hand and gets the hot tag and proceeds to come in and clean house and make everyone happy. Kane is not more over then Booker T. Booker T has all the tools needed to be a main eventer and has paid a lot more dues then Kane and oh yea- HE IS OVER!!! It should be Booker v. HHH, not Booker v. Kane
Guest Austin420 Posted October 2, 2002 Report Posted October 2, 2002 Look at Brock Lesnar. He's done absolutely nothing to deserve A belt, much less the World Title. And he's only been in the company six months. Explain that, if you will? I can, in two words, Brock-Berg! Vince wanted a Goldberg so he made one up. The only difference between Brock and Goldberg is that Brock has got a few NCAA Championships.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now