Undertaker/Lesnar

[Guest Trivia247]

since such a Evil Unholy event went down that Taker didn't take Baby Hewey's Offense like he was being hit like a Truck called Goldberg.. Now that it has happen, you can't unring the bell and suddenly make Taker bumping like he was being hit by a truck.... Called Goldberg.

 

oye

 

So they have to lead off Logically as to How they can get Brock to defeat Taker convincingly to follow with it and make the Unforgiven debacal actually look like it was mean't to happen.

 

I believe that despite what people said How The match went down was preplanned with all parties agree to it. Thats why they involved Sara in the mix. You see Sara, is not only a Supposed "Distraction" But it was also a Tool to Make Taker the character Focus on Absolutely destroying whomever he is facing. And by Brock too the credit of both, it wasn't a Squash, and despite Smarkish Taker HATRED, it wasn't a Complete Bitch out either. The Enraged Undertaker wanting Vengeance for the dishonor of his wife, met the Irresistable force, and the match look like both men took each other's best shots. And Still kept brawling. and Throwing Brock into the Wall was the Quintensental Exclaimation point on the Sara Issue.

 

Now Sara is now Out of the way, so the Emotional Factor is now not a Issue. Brock and Taker will go at it man on man in the Cage, and Brock will get the win.

 

Now with the business of the Hand, Like I said, they have to follow up on how the Unforgiven match went down. So breaking of the Hand, can be to make a Disadvantage for Taker, maybe there is a Particular reason for the Hand, that we will see later. Maybe Taker will be the one to be Thrown off the Cage. the Broken hand takes out the majority of Taker's Big offense, or at least make it more awkward as Taker would have to use his other hand in steadying.

 

In either way, will have to see how this developes

[LaParkaYourCar 0]

Yes, but why involve Sara at all? Why have an emotionally charged Taker? Aren't they still trying to push Brock as an unstopable force? If so why do any of the Sara stuff at all? It's a nice storyline in a different match, but it's out of place in the pushing of Brock.

 

You did a great job of defending the WWE's booking, but it doesn't make the booking any less poor.

[Guest Trivia247]

true but even Poor booking needs a defense...its in the Consitution!

[LaParkaYourCar 0]

As Bill Alfonso would say "It's your constitutional right to defend it!"

[Guest Brian]

Yes, that's why the finish was okay but it still doesn't explain the fact that Taker basically refused to sell the ribs for Brock, which was vital for his offense, and sandbagged.

[Guest Trivia247]

That can still be character perception. Undertaker, not the great seller on the planet was given a role a dozen years ago to explain why he didn't Sell. Now that gimmick obviously changed mutated and basically was abandoned over the years, all but the no selling. Taker still able to be a Bad ass No seller, He had 2 years of leaving the Darkside Gimmick, and Vince or the bookers never told him to start selling. in all honesty, Taker has been selling...about as Much the Sandman does. It could be Vince's own personal opinion that keeps that aspects of the Undertaker still alive. Maybe thats what keeps him as Taker and not as Mark Calloway. Undertaker may have Sandbagged, but All sides agreed on the Sandbagging Under the Premise that this is the First guy that didn't Bite the Dust To the MIGHT of Brock Lesnar. From Hardys to RVD to Flair, to Hogan, to Rock and Brock hits a Roadblock, and so it takes two PPVs to put down Undertaker. And on the Otherside. Brock represents The Destruction of the "New Generational Old Guard" and Undertaker's is basically the last Old school wrestler in Brock's way. and Undertaker will topple. In All my Undertaker Defense for him, I am Not blind that he is gonna lose this coming match, and he should lose. I don't care how however. Im not seeking Taker to Tap to that Wonderful Bearhug tackle. It could be a screwjobish Loss that would explain the broken Hand, Or It can be just a Man to Man Bloody Slugfest in the Cage, Taker's enviroment and Brock with his Strength and Youth Finally Overcomes and Soundly defeats Taker.

 

and also there is another possibility to why the Brock Taker Feud has prolonged.

 

We all assume that Angle or Benoit, but Angle to a greater degree is the Chosen one to finally bring down Brock. But in order to do that Angle or Benoit would have to take that face turn in take the belt. and Both aren't in that mode, so they are Bogged down in the Midcard feud. Angle and Benoit is always a great match, MOTY potential, but one of these guys need to Advance...these are the Top Atheletic and Skilled guys in the WWE. And One of them will be the ones to Beat Brock. But until then, they need that build up time with the fans and their own development. So while they need the Time, we get Brock vs Taker round 2.

 

After Taker, it has to be one of the two...Or what...they throw in another replacement? Edge maybe? Cena? mystero heh.

[Guest Goodear]

Can I just say how much I want to see Rey vs. Brock now that you've brought it up? Anyone up for a rousing game of REYBALL?

[LaParkaYourCar 0]

Just wait for Nash to come back and play a great game of lawn darts with Rey.

[Guest Goodear]

Just wait for Nash to come back and play a great game of lawn darts with Rey.

Yeah, like Nash will be able to catch up to Rey before his knee implodes into a black hole of wrestling hell. I'm imagining the race now...

 

READY!!!!

SET!!!!

FALL DOWN WITH TORN KNEE!!!

[Guest Spaceman Spiff]

Isn't it about time we got rid of the "Taker never sold, that's his character" argument? That was fine at the beginning of his career in the WWE, but it's 10 years later, he's pushing 40, and it's just ridiculous. When he does it now, it's just Taker being uncooperative.

[Guest wwF1587]

ut/brock HIAC = DESPERATION CHA CHA CHA!

 

Man... why!? Why the hell are they going to ruin HIAC? That was one of my fav. match types... now its going to be ruined. F U AGAIN VINCE!!

[Guest godthedog]

Isn't it about time we got rid of the "Taker never sold, that's his character" argument? That was fine at the beginning of his career in the WWE, but it's 10 years later, he's pushing 40, and it's just ridiculous. When he does it now, it's just Taker being uncooperative.

actually, taker sold rather well in his prime. watch his 97 bret hart matches. the 'taker never sold' people only think that because he knew when to no-sell.