Guest Breetai Posted October 5, 2002 Report Posted October 5, 2002 From 411 wrestling.com -Said the theory behind eliminating the Intercontinental Title is that if WWE has fewer titles, the titles themselves mean more. And so the reason for making a new and completely worthless belt and completely devaluing it by handing it to HHH on a silver platter is....
Zorin Industries Posted October 8, 2002 Report Posted October 8, 2002 Since no one has replied I just thought I would say hi to cheer you up.
Guest Youth N Asia Posted October 8, 2002 Report Posted October 8, 2002 Riiiight... So you have to be a cruiserweight, chick, or tag wrestler unless you're going to be world champ...that leaves a lot of people that will never see a belt. Fuck WWE
Zorin Industries Posted October 8, 2002 Report Posted October 8, 2002 Ross says that and then there going to have seperate belts on Smackdown, and the WWE expects ALL the belts to remain credible. Sure.
Guest Pop Culture God Posted October 9, 2002 Report Posted October 9, 2002 It occurs to me that looking for hypocricy in the Ross Report is like looking for sand on a motherfucking beach.
Guest thesmartmark Posted October 9, 2002 Report Posted October 9, 2002 It occurs to me that looking for hypocricy in the Ross Report is like looking for sand on a motherfucking beach. That was well said. All Ross does in that report is blow sunshine up the fans asses and tell them what they want to hear. The belts, all of them, don't mean shit anymore. Unless something drastic happens soon, then they will continue to mean nothing.
Guest Kotzenjunge Posted October 9, 2002 Report Posted October 9, 2002 I don't really call anyone from WWE on hypocrisy anymore. I don't expect them to say anything that sounds bad or potentially damaging to stockholders. It's when the internet reporters do it that it bothers me. Fo sheez, Kotzenjunge
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now