Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Report post Posted March 2, 2002 You really want Regal to have that belt instead of RVD? Are RVD matches really worse than Regal vs. Edge? Wasn't RVD vs. Goldust good enough to justify you WANTING him to end Regals reighn of suck? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Tony149 Report post Posted March 2, 2002 Time to get the belt off of Regal. Hell, if I had my way, Regal would lose the belt Monday. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Kahran Ramsus Report post Posted March 2, 2002 I liked Regal vs. Edge, better than RVD/Goldust. Its personal opinion. I understand that the WWF should put the title on RVD, but I would rather have Regal as champ. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Report post Posted March 2, 2002 THE ON THE POLE MATCH???????????? That's just blind cold hatred for no good reason. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Kahran Ramsus Report post Posted March 2, 2002 Not the pole match, but the one at the Rumble was better than RVD/Goldust. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest godthedog Report post Posted March 2, 2002 disclaimer: i'm gonna bitch a lot in this post, but i'm not the kind of person who bitches a lot. i just feel like it needs to be done. does anybody else think that, considering the sheer amount of talent the wwf has, they should be putting on the best wrestling television EVER right now? kurt angle the rock triple h lance storm rob van dam christian edge al snow shane helms chris jericho ric flair booker t mike awesome tajiri steve austin (who is probably the single most well-rounded wrestler this company's ever had) not to mention their MIAs (benoit, rhyno, & kanyon), the talent they let go (namely guerrero), and i can't even remember if kidman is still in the federation all these guys are capable of putting on a good to very good match, & many of them are capable of putting on a great match. and yet: their last ppv was the most disappointing in recent memory, the card for wrestlemania sucks already, and the weekly television is inane and boring. with a roster this large and this talented competing for a limited amount of spots, it's supposed to increase competition and make the product BETTER. wasn't the acquisition of wcw supposed to make their television BETTER? wasn't the signing of flair, hogan, nash, & hall supposed to make the television BETTER? what's the deal? how hard can it possibly be to make good television (even great television) with this kind of talent? i haven't seen a really good 'raw' episode in four months, & if the wwf doesn't get their shit together before wrestlemania i'll stop watching. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest goodhelmet Report post Posted March 2, 2002 "KAne has done NOTHING in months...possibly a whole year" losing the IC belt to Albert will do that to a man. "I liked Regal vs. Edge, better than RVD/Goldust" Dude, you must have accidentally popped in Uncenored 96 and watched the Finley-Regal match because his matches with Edge have been the pits. Dare I say it, but his match with Test was better than every single Regal-Edge matchup. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Report post Posted March 2, 2002 I'll let you in on the secret of why I hate Hilk Hogan. It also answers your question. In fact I think I'll make that my next column...I'll post it when it's done. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Kahran Ramsus Report post Posted March 2, 2002 Edge/Regal wasn't that bad (** or so). It wasn't good, but neither was Goldust/RVD. And it was certainly better than Edge/Test (DUD city). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Tony149 Report post Posted March 2, 2002 disclaimer: i'm gonna bitch a lot in this post, but i'm not the kind of person who bitches a lot. i just feel like it needs to be done. does anybody else think that, considering the sheer amount of talent the wwf has, they should be putting on the best wrestling television EVER right now? kurt angle the rock triple h lance storm rob van dam christian edge al snow shane helms chris jericho ric flair booker t mike awesome tajiri steve austin (who is probably the single most well-rounded wrestler this company's ever had) not to mention their MIAs (benoit, rhyno, & kanyon), the talent they let go (namely guerrero), and i can't even remember if kidman is still in the federation all these guys are capable of putting on a good to very good match, & many of them are capable of putting on a great match. and yet: their last ppv was the most disappointing in recent memory, the card for wrestlemania sucks already, and the weekly television is inane and boring. with a roster this large and this talented competing for a limited amount of spots, it's supposed to increase competition and make the product BETTER. wasn't the acquisition of wcw supposed to make their television BETTER? wasn't the signing of flair, hogan, nash, & hall supposed to make the television BETTER? what's the deal? how hard can it possibly be to make good television (even great television) with this kind of talent? i haven't seen a really good 'raw' episode in four months, & if the wwf doesn't get their shit together before wrestlemania i'll stop watching. Blame the writers for that. They haven't done a thing in a long time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Report post Posted March 2, 2002 Edge vs. Test at Survivor Series was a good match *** no lie. Edge vs. Regal was boring at Vengeance, better at Rumble (but not as good as Edge vs. Test at Survivor Series...it's true) and the ON the pole match was the worst match I've seen in a LONG time. RVD vs. Goldust was the MOTN at No Way Out IMO...and I thought it would be garcage going in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Kahran Ramsus Report post Posted March 2, 2002 Right, in your opinion, and I respect that. But, IMO, Austin/Jericho was MOTN. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest goodhelmet Report post Posted March 2, 2002 godthedog summed up what I've been saying for weeks, the WWF should be putting on 3 or 4 **** matches EVERY program. There is no excuse. It's not the writers fault the matches only get 2-3 minnutes. That's Vince's department and he is forgetting what brought him to the dance. When everybody but the hardcores abandon his product he is going to have to rethink the way he runs his damn business. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Kahran Ramsus Report post Posted March 2, 2002 The one good thing that could come out of this. It could kill Hall, Hogan & Nash's careers for good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Brian Report post Posted March 2, 2002 RVD/Golddust was horrible. No flow at the beginning, poor pacing to start, Dustin's offense not coming together until halfway into the match, and RVD negating the back. Edge/Regal wasn't good either, but both matches were the pits. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest goodhelmet Report post Posted March 2, 2002 "The one good thing that could come out of this. It could kill Hall, Hogan & Nash's careers for good." Part of me is hoping for that. the other part is saying that if I'm gonna watch Mania I want to be entertained for four hours. I think i could live with a bad Mania if the result was the NWO being fired for good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
