Guest BoboBrazil Posted November 22, 2002 Report Posted November 22, 2002 Smackdown scored a 3.5 broadcast rating, with a 5 share, according to Nielsen Media Research. That is down from last week's 3.6. 1wrestling
Guest godthedog Posted November 22, 2002 Report Posted November 22, 2002 bad news, especially for a post-ppv show & raw's ratings jump. this confirms that the stupidest possible move at survivor series was to put the title on the big show.
Guest The Electrifyer Posted November 22, 2002 Report Posted November 22, 2002 It is the Big Show. The smarks certainly don't like him and from talking to some of my "mark" friends, they hate him too.
Guest buffybeast Posted November 22, 2002 Report Posted November 22, 2002 Naw, the ratings were stagnant because of the hot competition on the other networks. You have friends, Survivor, CSI to compete with.
ChrisMWaters Posted November 22, 2002 Report Posted November 22, 2002 I know why the ratings were down last night... NO MATTITUDE FACTS!
Guest creativename Posted November 22, 2002 Report Posted November 22, 2002 It is the Big Show. The smarks certainly don't like him and from talking to some of my "mark" friends, they hate him too. Obvious moronic anti-smark comment: "But they're supposed to hate the Big Show, he's a heel!! That means he's effective!" That aside, I don't think this is a cause for concern. Hell, the difference could be due solely to rounding issues, for all we know. 0.1 is not a significant drop. I myself was hoping for a drop of 0.3 or greater, so that WWE would get the message. <sigh> A Lesnar face turn might actually help the SmackDown! ratings in the long-run though. The show was missing that main event face (Undertaker doesn't count; he's not going to add any extra viewers). Even Edge is stuck in the mid-card. Making a newly created monster face like Brock a focus of the show can't hurt ratings, IMO.
Guest godthedog Posted November 22, 2002 Report Posted November 22, 2002 It is the Big Show. The smarks certainly don't like him and from talking to some of my "mark" friends, they hate him too. Obvious moronic anti-smark comment: "But they're supposed to hate the Big Show, he's a heel!! That means he's effective!" That aside, I don't think this is a cause for concern. Hell, the difference could be due solely to rounding issues, for all we know. 0.1 is not a significant drop. I myself was hoping for a drop of 0.3 or greater, so that WWE would get the message. <sigh> A Lesnar face turn might actually help the SmackDown! ratings in the long-run though. The show was missing that main event face (Undertaker doesn't count; he's not going to add any extra viewers). Even Edge is stuck in the mid-card. Making a newly created monster face like Brock a focus of the show can't hurt ratings, IMO. brock was already a monster face before he lost to the big show. now he's even less of a monster face than he was before, since he lost to that fat fuck that chris benoit beat in 2 minutes.
Guest LooseCannon Posted November 22, 2002 Report Posted November 22, 2002 You know a .1 drop in the ratings, using Nielson sampling methods, is statistically insignificant.
Guest creativename Posted November 23, 2002 Report Posted November 23, 2002 brock was already a monster face before he lost to the big show. now he's even less of a monster face than he was before, since he lost to that fat fuck that chris benoit beat in 2 minutes. Not saying that losing to the Big Joke didn't hurt his cred, but Brock will get more over as a face if they make him the focus of the show, as it looks like they plan on doing.
Guest dreamer420 Posted November 23, 2002 Report Posted November 23, 2002 You know a .1 drop in the ratings, using Nielson sampling methods, is statistically insignificant. SURE IT DOES. THE WWE IS GOING TO DIE DON"T YOU KNOW?
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now