Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Guest BoboBrazil

Smackdown Rating

Recommended Posts

Guest BoboBrazil

Smackdown scored a 3.5 broadcast rating, with a 5 share, according to Nielsen Media Research. That is down from last week's 3.6.

 

1wrestling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest godthedog

bad news, especially for a post-ppv show & raw's ratings jump. this confirms that the stupidest possible move at survivor series was to put the title on the big show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest The Electrifyer

It is the Big Show. The smarks certainly don't like him and from talking to some of my "mark" friends, they hate him too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest buffybeast

Naw, the ratings were stagnant because of the hot competition on the other networks. You have friends, Survivor, CSI to compete with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest creativename
It is the Big Show. The smarks certainly don't like him and from talking to some of my "mark" friends, they hate him too.

Obvious moronic anti-smark comment: "But they're supposed to hate the Big Show, he's a heel!! That means he's effective!"

 

That aside, I don't think this is a cause for concern. Hell, the difference could be due solely to rounding issues, for all we know. 0.1 is not a significant drop. I myself was hoping for a drop of 0.3 or greater, so that WWE would get the message. <sigh>

 

A Lesnar face turn might actually help the SmackDown! ratings in the long-run though. The show was missing that main event face (Undertaker doesn't count; he's not going to add any extra viewers). Even Edge is stuck in the mid-card. Making a newly created monster face like Brock a focus of the show can't hurt ratings, IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest godthedog
It is the Big Show. The smarks certainly don't like him and from talking to some of my "mark" friends, they hate him too.

Obvious moronic anti-smark comment: "But they're supposed to hate the Big Show, he's a heel!! That means he's effective!"

 

That aside, I don't think this is a cause for concern. Hell, the difference could be due solely to rounding issues, for all we know. 0.1 is not a significant drop. I myself was hoping for a drop of 0.3 or greater, so that WWE would get the message. <sigh>

 

A Lesnar face turn might actually help the SmackDown! ratings in the long-run though. The show was missing that main event face (Undertaker doesn't count; he's not going to add any extra viewers). Even Edge is stuck in the mid-card. Making a newly created monster face like Brock a focus of the show can't hurt ratings, IMO.

brock was already a monster face before he lost to the big show. now he's even less of a monster face than he was before, since he lost to that fat fuck that chris benoit beat in 2 minutes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest LooseCannon

You know a .1 drop in the ratings, using Nielson sampling methods, is statistically insignificant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest creativename
brock was already a monster face before he lost to the big show. now he's even less of a monster face than he was before, since he lost to that fat fuck that chris benoit beat in 2 minutes.

Not saying that losing to the Big Joke didn't hurt his cred, but Brock will get more over as a face if they make him the focus of the show, as it looks like they plan on doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest dreamer420
You know a .1 drop in the ratings, using Nielson sampling methods, is statistically insignificant.

SURE IT DOES. THE WWE IS GOING TO DIE DON"T YOU KNOW?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×