Guest RetroRob215 Report post Posted March 5, 2002 For the last two weeks you have said that the WWF got rid of the 24/7 rule and is not bringing it back. Jr or King were right when they said the rule was always there, just no one had the balls to attack the Undertaker. I remember the announcers making reference to that when Undertaker first won the title. He just drove up the ramp on his bike, and King assumed that no one would have the guts to attack him. The WWF more than likely forgot the rule exsisted for the last few months, but it was never officialy revoked. Just thought I'd clear that up... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest RSPWFAQ Report post Posted March 6, 2002 For the last two weeks you have said that the WWF got rid of the 24/7 rule and is not bringing it back. No, I haven't ever said that, as a matter of fact. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Scotsman Report post Posted March 6, 2002 You say it to me all the time. Hell every time I log onto ICQ I have 300 msgs from you saying that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest jimmy no nose Report post Posted March 6, 2002 You say it to me all the time. Hell every time I log onto ICQ I have 300 msgs from you saying that. Oooh, looks like you've been caught, Scott. You may have never mentioned it in any of your rants, but Scotsman never lies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest RetroRob215 Report post Posted March 6, 2002 I must have misinterpreted your wording then, but then again, Scotsman would never lie to his fans. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Scotsman Report post Posted March 6, 2002 WE WANT AN APOLOGY SCOTT! NEXT SMARKDOWN REPORT! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Masked Yodeler Report post Posted March 6, 2002 Yeah, an apology! And free candy! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Vanilla Midget Report post Posted March 6, 2002 i know that the 24/7 rule was discarded when RVD was champ. i remember JR mentioning it on a raw, i think in the buildup to InVasion or possible summerslam, but the rule was definitely off while rvd was champ. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest J*ingus Report post Posted March 6, 2002 No, it was still in effect when RVD was champ. Remember the time on Raw a bit before No Mercy when Kurt Angle pinned him on the stage and won the belt, and then Austin threw them both off the stage, whereupon Rob rolled on top of Kurt (ew, that sounds eeeeevil) and regained the title. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Vanilla Midget Report post Posted March 6, 2002 it was in effect then, but shortly after they waived the rule in the leadup to a ppv match (the previous month i think jeff hardy used 24/7 to get the title the week before the ppv). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest J*ingus Report post Posted March 6, 2002 No, because RVD's feud with Austin and Angle came long after his feud with Jeff Hardy ended. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Vanilla Midget Report post Posted March 7, 2002 im not sure, though it could have been before no mercy (im clutching at air now, but it *did* happen), so that if rvd was pinned in the triple threat, he wouldnt lose his hardcore belt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
