CIA Target: Americans

[Guest cynicalprofit]

http://printerfriendly.abcnews.com/printer...vice=ABCNewsCom

 

CIA Target: Americans

Officials: U.S. Citizens Working for Al Qaeda Can Be Killed in CIA Actions

 

By John J. Lumpkin

The Associated Press

Dec. 3

 

— American citizens working for al Qaeda overseas can legally be targeted and killed by the CIA under President Bush's rules for the war on terrorism, U.S. officials say.

 

 

 

The authority to kill U.S. citizens is granted under a secret finding signed by the president after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that directs the CIA to covertly attack al Qaeda anywhere in the world. The authority makes no exception for Americans, so permission to strike them is understood rather than specifically described, officials said.

 

These officials said the authority will be used only when other options are unavailable. Military-like strikes will take place only when law enforcement and internal security efforts by allied foreign countries fail, the officials said.

 

Capturing and questioning al Qaeda operatives is preferable, even more so if an operative is a U.S. citizen, the officials said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. Any decision to strike an American will be made at the highest levels, perhaps by the president.

 

U.S. officials say few Americans are working with al Qaeda but they have no specific estimates.

 

The CIA already has killed one American under this authority, although U.S. officials maintain he wasn't the target.

 

On Nov. 3, a CIA-operated Predator drone fired a missile that destroyed a carload of suspected al Qaeda operatives in Yemen. The target of the attack, a Yemeni named Qaed Salim Sinan al-Harethi, was believed to be the top al Qaeda operative in that country. Efforts by Yemeni authorities to detain him had previously failed.

 

But the CIA didn't know a U.S. citizen, Yemeni-American Kamal Derwish, was in the car. He died, along with al-Harethi and four other Yemenis.

 

The Bush administration said the killing of an American in this fashion was legal.

 

"I can assure you that no constitutional questions are raised here. There are authorities that the president can give to officials," said Condoleezza Rice, Bush's national security adviser, after the attack. "He's well within the balance of accepted practice and the letter of his constitutional authority."

 

‘Matter of Common Respect’

 

American authorities have alleged that Derwish was the leader of an al Qaeda cell in suburban Buffalo, N.Y. Most of the alleged members of the cell were arrested and charged with supporting terrorists, but Derwish was not accused of any crime in American courts.

 

Family members in Buffalo say they have yet to be contacted by the U.S. government about Derwish's death, which they learned about through media reports.

 

Mohamed Albanna, vice president of the American Muslim Council's Buffalo chapter, urged federal authorities to confirm the death.

 

"It's just a matter of common respect for the family here. After all, they are U.S. citizens." He added that Derwish "has not been tried and has not been found guilty, so, in that sense, he's still an innocent American who was killed. That's what the law states."

 

The Bush administration sees it differently. In killing him, the administration defined Derwish as an enemy combatant, the equivalent of a U.S. citizen who fights with the enemy on a battlefield, officials said. Under this legal definition, experts say, his constitutional rights are nullified and he can be killed outright.

 

Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, supported this policy. "A U.S. citizen terrorist will kill you just like somebody from another country."

 

The government has done little publicly to justify Derwish's killing. Officials have privately suggested his association with al-Harethi is reason enough.

 

Other Americans have been similarly classed since Sept. 11, 2001, including Jose Padilla, accused of plotting to use a radioactive "dirty bomb" in the United States, and Yaser Esam Hamdi, who was found fighting with the Taliban in Afghanistan. Both are in military custody.

 

However, a third American, John Walker Lindh, was turned over to the civilian courts after being found serving as a foot soldier with the Taliban. He was sentenced to 20 years in prison after pleading guilty to supplying services to the Taliban and carrying explosives in commission of a felony.

 

While officials believe only a small number of U.S. citizens went through Osama bin Laden's camps, Americans have been associated with all levels of al Qaeda.

 

This includes high-level operative Wadih El Hage, a Lebanese-American who was convicted in connection with the 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa. A former U.S. Army soldier, Ali Mohamed, worked as a trainer and target scout for bin Laden before he was captured and convicted.

 

Previously, the government's authority to kill a citizen outside of the judicial process has been generally restricted to when the American is directly threatening the lives of other Americans or their allies.

 

Earlier presidential authorizations of lethal covert action, in Latin America and elsewhere, have also tacitly allowed the killing of Americans fighting with the other side, former senior intelligence officials said.

 

But the officials knew of no instances where U.S. citizens were targeted.

 

The CIA declines comment on covert actions and the authorities it operates under.

 

Potential Problems

 

Experts on the Constitution and the international laws of war said the Bush administration's definitions create problems.

 

Unlike the enemy in previous wars, al Qaeda members don't wear uniforms or serve in a foreign nation's army. Nor do they take to traditional battlefields, except in Afghanistan. But the Bush administration and al Qaeda together have defined the entire world as a battlefield, meaning the attack on al-Harethi and Derwish was tantamount to an airstrike in a combat zone.

 

"That is the most vulnerable aspect of the theory," said Scott L. Silliman, director of Duke University's Center on Law, Ethics and National Security. "Could you put a Hellfire missile into a car in Washington, D.C., under the same theory? The answer is yes, you could."

 

Human rights groups were divided on the legality of the attack on al-Harethi. Amnesty International suggested it was an extrajudicial killing, outlawed by international treaty, while Human Rights Watch officials said they believed it was a legitimate wartime action.

Copyright 2002 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Copyright © 2002 ABC News Internet Ventures.

Click here for Press Information, Terms of Use & Privacy Policy & Internet Safety Information applicable to the site.

[Guest Jobber of the Week]

Goodbye, innocent until proven guilty.

 

"We found this guy out in the desert, and we swear he was working with terrorists, so we killed him. Honestly, he was communicating with known terrorist figures. Just take our word for it.. Aww, cmon, we're the government, would we lie to you?"

[Guest Hogan Made Wrestling]

Here's an interesting question: suppose deep-cover CIA spies infiltrate Al-Queda and are later assassinated by another branch of the CIA unaware of their assignment. What might be the repercussions? Or would they cover it up by denying they were spies in the first place?

[Guest DrTom]

American citizens working for al Qaeda overseas can legally be targeted and killed by the CIA under President Bush's rules for the war on terrorism, U.S. officials say.

Good. Fucking traitor scum, it's what they deserve. I would have sent John Walker Lindh to the gallows for treason, too.

 

Unlike the enemy in previous wars, al Qaeda members don't wear uniforms or serve in a foreign nation's army. Nor do they take to traditional battlefields, except in Afghanistan.

I think this was the argument for saying the Geneva Convention does not apply to Al'Qaeda forces. I agree. I'm not saying we should torture and abuse them; we're still obligated to treat all prisoners as humanely as possible. But no one can cite Geneva Convention abuses if we don't always go by the letter of the law.

[Guest Vern Gagne]

Goodbye, innocent until proven guilty.

 

"We found this guy out in the desert, and we swear he was working with terrorists, so we killed him. Honestly, he was communicating with known terrorist figures. Just take our word for it.. Aww, cmon, we're the government, would we lie to you?"

This implies to people who are working or are members of Al Qaeda. They'll have hard evidence before they assassinate these people. I'm sure the bleeding hearts will be outraged no matter what, and this some traitors mom will be on saying her son wasn't a terrrorist.