LaParkaYourCar Posted December 8, 2002 Report Posted December 8, 2002 Should they go back to Kayfabe? Is the business overexposed? Or would it just make for more annoying marks?
LaParkaYourCar Posted December 8, 2002 Author Report Posted December 8, 2002 I guess I should say, should the WWE go back to Kayfabe since they are the ones who mostly expose the business. Should it be a more old-school approach to wrestling? Treated as more legitimate than it's treated now.
Guest bob_barron Posted December 8, 2002 Report Posted December 8, 2002 Well it'd be kinda impossible- they can't just go back
Guest CoreyLazarus416 Posted December 8, 2002 Report Posted December 8, 2002 They actually could, but it'd take a while. It's no secret that everybody older than 9 knows wrestling is "fake," but matches where it isn't so incredibly obvious could help kayfabe along. I'd say break it outside of the ring and off-air, but keep it 100% intact while on-air or in the ring.
Guest razazteca Posted December 8, 2002 Report Posted December 8, 2002 the Ace & Gary marriage kind of destroyed whatever was left
Guest dreamer420 Posted December 9, 2002 Report Posted December 9, 2002 Wrestling will never be able to return to what it once was. That is a sad but true fact as every wrestling fan in the world all ready knows way too much to ever forget.
LaParkaYourCar Posted December 10, 2002 Author Report Posted December 10, 2002 Okay maybe Kayfabe is the wrong thing to say. They should take it more serious though.
Guest deadbeater Posted December 12, 2002 Report Posted December 12, 2002 They should have serious fun. More Goldust/Booker T like.
Guest NoSelfWorth Posted December 20, 2002 Report Posted December 20, 2002 You can't close Pandora's box.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now