Guest Anglesault Report post Posted January 26, 2003 LONDON (Jan. 25) - Waving goodbye to families and denouncing "imperialist" warmongering, the first convoy of Western volunteers set out from London on double-decker buses on Saturday to act as "human shields" against any attack on Iraq. About 50 volunteers, ranging from a 19-year-old factory worker to a 60-year-old former diplomat, formed the first in a series of convoys organisers say will take hundreds of anti-war activists to Iraq. Dismissed by critics as naively playing into Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's hands, the volunteers plan to fan out to heavily populated areas of Baghdad and other parts of the country as a deterrent to Western bombing. "Our strategy is potentially dangerous but that is the risk we must take in standing beside our brothers and sisters in Iraq," said former U.S. marine Ken Nichols, whose Human Shield Action Iraq group is coordinating the London departures. "We have been inundated by volunteers. This is just the first wave. I am calling for 10,000 to get down there and stop this war," he told Reuters. Saturday's convoy -- like others being planned for early February -- will travel across Europe, picking up more people on the way, loading provisions and stopping to promote their cause. Nichols' group is one of several around the world whose aim is to mobilise peace activists as human shields in Iraq and show solidarity with Iraqi people in the face of a possible U.S.-led war against Saddam. FORMER HOSTAGES The campaign has upset some among the thousands of Westerners detained by Saddam to act as shields against attacks after his 1990 invasion of Kuwait and during the 1991 Gulf War. They feel the volunteers do not appreciate the seriousness of what they are doing and are unaware of their past suffering. "The majority went through hell on wheels," said Steve Brookes, who ran a support group for British victims. "Of the 1,800 or so British hostages, most suffered from some form of post-traumatic stress." Volunteers from Nichols' group, mainly from Western nations but including some from Turkey and China, insist they are not going to support Saddam but to try to prevent the death of innocent people. "When we arrive, we will work out where the bombing is most likely to be, where there would be most casualties, and we will go there. Our purpose is to protect civilians," 32-year-old lecturer Uzma Bashir, from Yorkshire in northern England, told Reuters. Many have had trouble convincing their families of the importance of their mission. "Nine out of 10 of the people going as human shields are more scared of what their mothers say than the bombs in Iraq," said Bashir, who plans to join a second convoy from London. In the Muslim world, the main rallying point for would-be human shields is in Jordan. There, a campaign led by leftist parties and civic bodies is seeking 100,000 volunteers. Baghdad has said it will receive the volunteers with open arms and help them decide where to place themselves. Washington and London are trying to garner international support for possible military strikes over Saddam's alleged programmes to develop weapons of mass destruction. What horseshit. The assholes rank right up there with "sucide by cop" people. You want to die? Pills are much easier. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Downhome Report post Posted January 26, 2003 Woohoo, more casulities baby! (I'm half joking, before you flame me.) If morons wish to die, to stand on the field of battle, then that is there decision. It should in NO WAY change our method of attack, if it comes down to that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vern Gagne Report post Posted January 26, 2003 The U.S. and British will not purposely target civilian targets. I know these people want that. If you're going to be a human target try standing near a military facility. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Downhome Report post Posted January 26, 2003 Once we start the war, and it really gets going, when it's ALL said and done, I'm willing to bet that quite a few very interesting moments will have happened. Both very good, and very bad for many. I don't feel this will be as simple as many make it out to be, this will be very different someone. Eh, it's just a feeling I have. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest RobJohnstone Report post Posted January 26, 2003 These guys are idiots. I think if they want to be shields, let them be. Any US citizen or any citizen of any other country who tries to stop a war by being a shield is infact an enemy. We must not comprimise our national security interests for some whacked out idiot peacenics. Oh well, it's not to late for them to turn back. --Rob Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Agent of Oblivion Report post Posted January 26, 2003 Lets see how many of them stick to their convictions when the bombs start dropping out of a silent night sky. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Ozymandias Report post Posted January 27, 2003 That's an amazingly brave and selfless thing to do, but it's also pretty stupid considering what a homicidal psychopath Bush is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest HecateRose Report post Posted January 27, 2003 I have to disagree that it is amazingly brave and selfless to do what these people are doing (though I do agree that it is pretty stupid). In my opinion, I bet most of these people don't think they have anything to worry about. They think that if enough of them are there then that particular area won't get bombed. They actually think they are pretty safe (isn't that sad). As for selfless, they are doing this to promote their cause as much (if not more) as they are doing it for the Iraqi people. I'm sure there are some in the group that are being selfless, but I cannot believe that the majority is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest big Dante Cruz Report post Posted January 27, 2003 Wonder how long it will take them to realize that the Iraqis are going to play "Shoot the Western Infidels" and putting their crosshairs at the base of some 'human shield' skulls. Seriously, going over there is going to stop a war? Is this a symptom of departure from reality or are they really that bigoted? If any nation decides to take up the war, these idiots aren't going to stop them. "Sir, what about reports of human shield deaths in Iraq?" "They shouldn't have been standing right in front of the bullets, dumbass." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Invader3k Report post Posted January 27, 2003 What I'm interested to find out is how many get killed or kidnapped once they get to Iraq by the Iraqis. I mean, it's not exactly a country that's friendly to Westerners, even if the Iraqi government is welcoming them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites