Guest HartFan86 Report post Posted February 17, 2003 http://sponsors.wwe.com/magpoll/index.html Bret Hart vs. HBK. Damn...Bret beat Taker, Austin AND Hogan! Wow. VOTE NOW. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest pappajacks Report post Posted February 17, 2003 Whoever said that the fans have forgotten Bret Hart? It's a truly amazing feat for Bret, considering he hasn't been in the WWE for over 5 years and hasn't been seen in wrestling in 3 years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Quik Report post Posted February 17, 2003 Think Vinny would rig a poll? "Dammitt Bret, the fans still remember! They want you back!" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest My Eyebrow is on fire Report post Posted February 17, 2003 wwe.com is always rigged - the question is why would they have bret win this poll? a comeback has to be in store Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted February 17, 2003 Maybe they didn't rig it for once...but If HBK gets VOTEs over Rock, Austin, Taker...why can't he draw? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheFranchise 0 Report post Posted February 17, 2003 Angle out in the first round? HOGAN HOLDS DOWN TALENT ON THE INTERNET! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mad Dog Report post Posted February 17, 2003 I think it's rigged if HBK wins. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheFranchise 0 Report post Posted February 17, 2003 Of course it is, HBK wins, then you'll see him start miracuously challenging for the title again. sigh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheZsaszHorsemen Report post Posted February 18, 2003 I'm voting for HBK because there is no Diesel option. Yeah. Right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheZsaszHorsemen Report post Posted February 18, 2003 Oh, and the fact that Backlund isn't in the finals is proof it was rigged. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vitamin X Report post Posted February 18, 2003 but what about Bruno Sammartino? Anyone who was champion for *7 YEARS* deserves this title.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cawthon777 0 Report post Posted February 18, 2003 but what about Bruno Sammartino? Anyone who was champion for *7 YEARS* deserves this title.. With all due respect to guys like Backlund and Bruno, but the WWF could not have become as big as it is now if these guys were the best flagbearers the company ever had. It took Hogan to make the company a world-wide entity and it took guys like Bret Hart and HBK to give the title credibility. Bret better fucking win. REMEMBER THE MOLSON CENTRE!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest JHawk Report post Posted February 18, 2003 With all due respect to guys like Backlund and Bruno, but the WWF could not have become as big as it is now if these guys were the best flagbearers the company ever had. It took Hogan to make the company a world-wide entity and it took guys like Bret Hart and HBK to give the title credibility. Bret better fucking win. REMEMBER THE MOLSON CENTRE!!!!! Well, I could see that argument for Bruno since Vince Sr. did try to go national in the 60s, but Backlund was never really given the chance to see if he could get over outside the northeast. Then again, Backlund was getting booed against Hogan in 1980, so he wasn't really that over in the northeast either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites