I need honest opinions here folks

[Guest Black Tiger]

In my public address course for college I have to give an informitive speech. I'm going to talk about UFC.

 

I need to have a visual aid, I want to show the Joe Son vs. Keith Hackney fight from UFC 4 (total time of fight in 2:42) anyone who's seen it will know why its so famous. Does this sound like a good idea?

[Guest Evil Ash]

Only if you want to give the impression that the UFC (and mixed martial arts in general) is about a couple of morons bashing each other in the testicals. I'd say it gives a bad impression, and more importantly it's completely out-dated. Groin shots are no longer allowed.

 

Newton vs Pele is only 7 minutes, and it's great, technical stuff. Why don't you show that instead?

[Guest Black Tiger]

I have a limit of 6:00 for the whole speech, and I intend to bring up Joe Son as an example of a UFC fighter who is famous for all the wrong reasons. Which is why I chose that fight.

 

If anyone has an idea of a good fight that isn't very long, then please help me out. The only other ones I can think of are Coleman vs. Kitao from UFC 9 (0:47, when Kitao suffers a broken nose) and Tuli vs. Gourdu from UFC 1 (2:?? when Tuli gets his tooth kicked into the front row)

[Guest Youth N Asia]

BJ Penn vs Caol Uno from either UFC 31 or 34...can't remember which...very short.

 

Abbot also beats a guy down in UFC 6 in a matter of seconds.

[Guest Evil Ash]

I'd say Hackney looks far worse in that match. He's the one breaking the rules.

 

For something really dramatic, there's Goodrich vs Some Schmoe from UFC 8. He elbows him in the head six times. Really messes him up. Short, short match.