Guest Raven_Effect01 Report post Posted March 9, 2003 I haven't seen a good Interrogation segment after Ron Killings had one, as The Sandman and Kid Kash had really dumb answers to just about every question they were asked, which leads to my question: Should NWA-TNA get rid of the segment or not? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Astro101 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2003 I say only use it when furthuring some angle. Such as Killings and going off on Mike and Don. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest CoreyLazarus416 Report post Posted March 9, 2003 I say keep it, but just pick people that can usually give better interviews. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Report post Posted March 9, 2003 They could use a minute alot worse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Space_Cowboy Report post Posted March 9, 2003 I wouldn't particularly care if they eliminated it or not, but if they did they'd probably just give another minute to Disgraceland or some crap. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
syxx2001 0 Report post Posted March 10, 2003 it would be good if they didn't dodge the question like sandman did. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Raven_Effect01 Report post Posted March 10, 2003 it would be good if they didn't dodge the question like sandman did. That's most likely the problem with recent Interrogation segments. Though if NWA-TNA wants to keep it, they need to get wrestlers who answer the questions honestly and not pull a Sandman or Kid Kash. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest nikowwf Report post Posted March 10, 2003 They should script it. This SHOOT INTEVIEW russo mentality is stupid. Script it. Its better, and it gets across whatever point you want it to. niko Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Report post Posted March 10, 2003 Shoot interviews existed long before Russo. Russo's contribution was to take the idea of a shoot and turn it into a work that people are supposed to beleive is still a shoot...and then put it on TV. Very confusing. The segment should be either a shoot to get to actually know about the people and what they think. OR a work used to set up storylines like they did with the Truth. But scripting it out to appear as a shoot is more Russo like and doesn't generally lead anywhere. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
syxx2001 0 Report post Posted March 11, 2003 yea, its funny how people make russo out to be the creator of the shoot interview. and i like shoots that blur the line of reality. i just hate how people think the hogan/vince thing from smackdown was the best thing to happen to wrestling when tna has been doing it for weeks but they call it trash after watching 0 shows. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
