Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Guest TheMikeSC

A New Low For PETA

Recommended Posts

Guest TheMikeSC

On January 26, Palestinian terrorists loaded a donkey with explosives and detonated it as an Israeli bus approached.

 

This, of course, infuriated PETA --- because they used a donkey. They issued a letter to Arafat, requesting that they no longer use animals in their conflict.

 

When PETA President Ingrid Newkirk was asked why she didn't request the terrorists stop killing people, she said "It's not my business to inject myself into human wars."

-=Mike --- apparently, humanity is low on the PETA food chain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest B-X

God Damn, you have to find something to villanize, don't you? This isn't the worst thing PETA has done, BY FAR. So a donkey blew up, and they protested? THE BASTARDS!

 

Besides, PETA is an animal-rights organization. They are more concerned with animal issues, hence the agenda. Why don't we condemn the Newport 60 and over Bridge club for not speaking out against the killing of Israelis? They have just about as much relevance on the matter as PETA does...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Flyboy
When PETA President Ingrid Newkirk was asked why she didn't request the terrorists stop killing people, she said "It's not my business to inject myself into human wars."

 

 

Man... that shit is funny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest TheMikeSC
God Damn, you have to find something to villanize, don't you? This isn't the worst thing PETA has done, BY FAR. So a donkey blew up, and they protested? THE BASTARDS!

 

Besides, PETA is an animal-rights organization. They are more concerned with animal issues, hence the agenda. Why don't we condemn the Newport 60 and over Bridge club for not speaking out against the killing of Israelis? They have just about as much relevance on the matter as PETA does...

OK, try and comprehend what happened:

 

PETA had NO problem that INNOCENT people were killed. They did not CARE that PEOPLE died.

 

But a DONKEY died and THAT was the biggie.

 

I don't have to "look" for something to villainize --- they provide tons and tons of material that makes my job SO much easier.

 

And, the other groups didn't send letters to Arafat asking him to not use animals in his desire to kill people --- PETA did.

-=Mike --- Who will now search for a baby seal to club.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest kkktookmybabyaway

Heck, over there a jackass is more valuable than a human life. I bet a donkey can carry more weight than some 15-year old Palestinian.

 

Plus Saddam doesn't have to pay the parents of the donkey $25,000 either after he blows up...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest JMA
OK, try and comprehend what happened:

 

PETA had NO problem that INNOCENT people were killed. They did not CARE that PEOPLE died.

 

But a DONKEY died and THAT was the biggie.

 

I don't have to "look" for something to villainize --- they provide tons and tons of material that makes my job SO much easier.

 

And, the other groups didn't send letters to Arafat asking him to not use animals in his desire to kill people --- PETA did.

-=Mike --- Who will now search for a baby seal to club.

Well, I wouldn't say they DIDN'T care people died. PETA is, after all, RUN by people. Not that I support them. They seem to make asses of themselves (pardon the pun) a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tyler McClelland

Seriously, they protect ANIMAL interests. Thus, they ask for ANIMALS to not be used. I think it's a friggin' given that they don't support the fact that people were killed, but it's not PETA's responsibility to go off and lobby Palestine about terrorism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest kkktookmybabyaway

"Huh? Where is "over there"? Norfolk, Virgina?"

 

Only if VA has a plethora of suicide bombers...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Vern Gagne
OK, try and comprehend what happened:

 

PETA had NO problem that INNOCENT people were killed. They did not CARE that PEOPLE died.

 

But a DONKEY died and THAT was the biggie.

 

I don't have to "look" for something to villainize --- they provide tons and tons of material that makes my job SO much easier.

 

And, the other groups didn't send letters to Arafat asking him to not use animals in his desire to kill people --- PETA did.

-=Mike --- Who will now search for a baby seal to club.

Well, I wouldn't say they DIDN'T care people died. PETA is, after all, RUN by people. Not that I support them. They seem to make asses of themselves (pardon the pun) a lot.

Keep in mind this is the same group that compared the treatment of animals to the victims of the Holocaust.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest DrTom
I think it's a friggin' given that they don't support the fact that people were killed, but it's not PETA's responsibility to go off and lobby Palestine about terrorism.

Then they should simply shut the fuck up when something like this happens. Christ, if North Korea launches a nuke at the West Coast and kills a few spotted owls, I'm sure Kim Jong Il will get a PETA nastygram for his cruelty to the endangered animal. If PETA doesn't enjoy being portrayed as out-of-touch imbeciles, then they shouldn't go so far out of their way to look so bloody fucking STUPID.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest AlwaysPissedOff

Goddamn, that's funny. It's great when dumbasses pull stupid shit like this for my enjoyment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest TheMikeSC
Seriously, they protect ANIMAL interests. Thus, they ask for ANIMALS to not be used. I think it's a friggin' given that they don't support the fact that people were killed, but it's not PETA's responsibility to go off and lobby Palestine about terrorism.

It's called HUMANITY! I cannot believe I'm actually reading DEFENSES of this idiotic group that will protest the use of animals in the slaughtering of humans, but won't mention the slaughtering of HUMANS whatsoever.

 

Let's pretend that somebody used, say, Microsoft-licensed software to hunt down and kill all dissidents in, say, China.

 

Let's say Bill Gates fired off a letter to the Chinese Premier, asking that they not use Microsoft software to assist them in their persecution of "enemies of the state" --- but didn't utter one word about them killing tons of people.

 

Would you have no problem with Gates' actions?

-=Mike --- Who imagines you probably would have a gripe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest evenflowDDT
It's called HUMANITY! I cannot believe I'm actually reading DEFENSES of this idiotic group that will protest the use of animals in the slaughtering of humans, but won't mention the slaughtering of HUMANS whatsoever.

AL QUDS, Jan 26: A donkey carrying a bomb blew up on Sunday just ahead of an Israeli bus carrying soldiers in the West Bank, but caused no casualties, an Israeli settler source said.

 

The source said the bus had braked just before the blast, which was apparently triggered by remote control, near the village of Al Khader in the southern West Bank.

 

The bus was travelling from Al Quds south to the settlement bloc of Gush Etzion. The army halted traffic after the explosion to launch a hunt for the perpetrators, the source said.-AFP

 

Source: DAWN - Internet Edition

 

Save yourself the energy Mike and just shut up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest TheMikeSC
It's called HUMANITY! I cannot believe I'm actually reading DEFENSES of this idiotic group that will protest the use of animals in the slaughtering of humans, but won't mention the slaughtering of HUMANS whatsoever.

AL QUDS, Jan 26: A donkey carrying a bomb blew up on Sunday just ahead of an Israeli bus carrying soldiers in the West Bank, but caused no casualties, an Israeli settler source said.

 

The source said the bus had braked just before the blast, which was apparently triggered by remote control, near the village of Al Khader in the southern West Bank.

 

The bus was travelling from Al Quds south to the settlement bloc of Gush Etzion. The army halted traffic after the explosion to launch a hunt for the perpetrators, the source said.-AFP

 

Source: DAWN - Internet Edition

 

Save yourself the energy Mike and just shut up.

Ah, way to COMPLETELY miss the point.

 

Can't say I'm shocked.

-=Mike --- Who might talk more now JUST to annoy you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest evenflowDDT
Ah, way to COMPLETELY miss the point.

How so? You insulted an ANIMAL rights group for taking action against an ANIMAL's death when no human casualties were involved. What's the point? Oh, let me guess... PETA should be lobbying for the Palestinians because they're ANIMALS, right? Did I get the joke? Oh ho ho, you are a funny funny man Mike.

 

Nice try kiddo. You can make all the HILARIOUS insults you want towards the UN or whatever else because I don't know any better, but I caught you this time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest DrTom

I think his point, Flow, is that the Palestinians intended to use the bomb to blow up a busful of innocent civilians. And instead of staying out of the matter altogether, PETA decided to carp about the fact that a donkey was used to deliver the bomb. NOT that the bomb was deployed with the intention of killing civilians, which is, to anyone with a whit of intelligence, the MUCH larger issue here.

 

The fact that no casualties occurred is fortunate, but ultimately meaningless. Is attempted murder not a crime because the would-be killer didn't succeed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest JMA

The holocaust comments they made were wrong. But I don't how it is wrong for them to get upset about this. They are, after all, an ANIMAL rights group. They don't want donkeys blown up. But I don't think that means they didn't care whether the people lived or died.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest DrTom
They don't want donkeys blown up. But I don't think that means they didn't care whether the people lived or died.

 

But guess how their words and deeds are perceived. A TERRORIST ATTACK was carried out -- thankfully without casualties -- as part of a continuing terror campaign, and they're bitching that a fucking donkey died. This is why there is a great value in silence. A wise maxim applies to the ACLU here:

 

"Better to be silent and thought an idiot than to speak and remove all doubt."

 

They removed all doubt on this one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest NoCalMike

Personally, I think PETA was stupid for even writing to Arafat, azif he would care what they had to say anyway. There are a lot better "animal" causes out there to be bringing to people's attention.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest JMA
But guess how their words and deeds are perceived. A TERRORIST ATTACK was carried out -- thankfully without casualties -- as part of a continuing terror campaign, and they're bitching that a fucking donkey died.

I see what you're saying, but don't they have a right to bitch that a donkey died? That's what they do. They're people for the ethical treatment of animals. That's their main priority. Isn't it implied that the terrorist attack was a bad thing for the people? After all, I'm sure members of PETA lost family members in 9/11. It was pretty strange that they wrote to Arafat, though.

 

Just playing devil's advocate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest EricMM

I would just like to add that this is another crime that we can add to the terrorist's list of crimes in the middle east.

 

I'm sure that donkey did not deserve to be blown up. I'm sure it was minding it's own business, carrying it's cargo, happily, when it friggin exploded!

 

This is an outrage. This is like, something from a hot shots movie. or you know, naked gun.

 

Anyways, everyone knows it's sheep that explode not donkeys.

 

Seriously though, I'm sure PETA just assumed that it was a GIVEN that people were killed, and wanted to add to it. I hope anyways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest JangoFett4Hire

In related news, John Deere just wrote a nasty note to Ariel Sharon asking that the next time Israel runs over an American college student, to not use one of their bulldozers...

 

Where is the outrage on that btw?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest TheMikeSC
Ah, way to COMPLETELY miss the point.

How so? You insulted an ANIMAL rights group for taking action against an ANIMAL's death when no human casualties were involved. What's the point? Oh, let me guess... PETA should be lobbying for the Palestinians because they're ANIMALS, right? Did I get the joke? Oh ho ho, you are a funny funny man Mike.

 

Nice try kiddo. You can make all the HILARIOUS insults you want towards the UN or whatever else because I don't know any better, but I caught you this time.

Please, don't try and use wit. Your failed attempts are painful.

-=Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest TheMikeSC
The holocaust comments they made were wrong. But I don't how it is wrong for them to get upset about this. They are, after all, an ANIMAL rights group. They don't want donkeys blown up. But I don't think that means they didn't care whether the people lived or died.

Then why did they not mention that they shouldn't kill people, either?

 

If they don't want to look like tools --- like our friend Evenflow, for example --- they might wish to shut their collective mouths and not simply re-prove what people already assume about them.

-=Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest JMA
Then why did they not mention that they shouldn't kill people, either?

 

Isn't that kinda friggin' obvious?

 

If they don't want to look like tools --- like our friend Evenflow, for example --- they might wish to shut their collective mouths and not simply re-prove what people already assume about them.

 

Hey, leave Evenflow alone. And they're obviously not going to shut their collective mouths anytime soon. The holocaust thing was uncalled for, but this is perfectly fine. They don't want donkeys to be blown up--what's wrong with that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest TheMikeSC
Then why did they not mention that they shouldn't kill people, either?

 

Isn't that kinda friggin' obvious?

 

If they don't want to look like tools --- like our friend Evenflow, for example --- they might wish to shut their collective mouths and not simply re-prove what people already assume about them.

 

Hey, leave Evenflow alone. And they're obviously not going to shut their collective mouths anytime soon. The holocaust thing was uncalled for, but this is perfectly fine. They don't want donkeys to be blown up--what's wrong with that?

Not with PETA it isn't.

 

"Leave Evenflow alone"? Naah.

 

They seem to have no problem with people getting blown up.

-=Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest JMA
They seem to have no problem with people getting blown up.

 

You have no proof of that. You are basing it on your hate for PETA and speculation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×