Guest Plushy Al Logan Posted March 21, 2003 Report Posted March 21, 2003 You tell me what to do, voting ends next friday.
Guest Retro Rob Posted March 22, 2003 Report Posted March 22, 2003 None of those really light my world on fire, but I went with WM 2000 since reaction to it seems to be 50/50.
Guest goodhelmet Posted March 22, 2003 Report Posted March 22, 2003 i went with the survivor series tape because quite honestly, i am tired of 3000 reviews of the same old tired ppv's. i already saw wm2000 and have my own opinion. i need opinions for shows i should pursue or avoid. something different from the norm.
Guest Kingpk Posted March 22, 2003 Report Posted March 22, 2003 Is a 5 hour Smackdown Six comp different from the norm? I'll probably be doing a Flair/Steamboat comp after that.
Guest goodhelmet Posted March 22, 2003 Report Posted March 22, 2003 bro, knock yourself out!!!! when i say different from the norm, i mean every ppv Sk reviewed over the last 6 years. really, most people just echo his sentiments anyway so what is the point? as for the Smackdown 6 comp, rock on my brother! As long as it is available somewhere for purchase or trade, I would def. be interested in the review.
Guest nWoScorpion Posted March 22, 2003 Report Posted March 22, 2003 I voted for the Survivor Series tape for 1 reason. To hear people insult Michael Cole on how dumb he is. According to him, Shawn Michaels made his SSeries debut in 1989, even though I'm ALMOST 100% sure he was in the 1988 edition too. (sarcasm btw.) I'd preffer some WCW television comp reviews of televised matches NOT shown on COTC ot a PPV, but thats me.
Guest bob_barron Posted March 22, 2003 Report Posted March 22, 2003 Tim Livingston did a review of a lot of the Smackdown! 6 stuff over at 411mania- so that's not even original either! :-)
Guest Retro Rob Posted March 22, 2003 Report Posted March 22, 2003 It seems like most people review old WWF PPV's and very few WCW ones. I'm not sure what I'll be doing once WM2 is done (2 matches left). I'm leaning towards Superbrawl 1, but that may change.
Guest Aero Posted March 22, 2003 Report Posted March 22, 2003 I voted for the Survivor Series tapes because I'm interested in seeing some reviews for 92-95... I, at least, haven't seen many reviews for those shows, outside of SK's.
Guest Retro Rob Posted March 22, 2003 Report Posted March 22, 2003 Eh, I don't really see the point in reviewing a comp like the SurS one since the matches are all clipped to hell.
Guest nWoScorpion Posted March 23, 2003 Report Posted March 23, 2003 It's only 60 minutes I think, so If you thinmk there is a lot of stuff on it, think again. Spanning 11 shows in hour is not too bright, but of course, nothing REALLY historic or ground breaking happend on Survivor Series except for 1 or 2 things.
Guest Plushy Al Logan Posted March 24, 2003 Report Posted March 24, 2003 I voted for the Survivor Series tape for 1 reason. To hear people insult Michael Cole on how dumb he is. According to him, Shawn Michaels made his SSeries debut in 1989, even though I'm ALMOST 100% sure he was in the 1988 edition too. (sarcasm btw.) I'd preffer some WCW television comp reviews of televised matches NOT shown on COTC ot a PPV, but thats me. Correct.
HurriShane Posted March 25, 2003 Report Posted March 25, 2003 I voted for Raw Vol. 2 because I have the DVD and I haven't seen any reviews for it.
Guest bob_barron Posted March 25, 2003 Report Posted March 25, 2003 CHEAP PLUG ALERT! http://www.411mania.com/wrestling/videos/a...p?videos_id=575
Guest TheGame2705 Posted March 25, 2003 Report Posted March 25, 2003 Tim Livingston did a review of a lot of the Smackdown! 6 stuff over at 411mania- so that's not even original either! :-) Yeah but doing a good review this time around of that stuff would be original :-)
Guest Plushy Al Logan Posted March 31, 2003 Report Posted March 31, 2003 It will be up in a few days.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now