Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Guest Downhome

Will the United States go to war again...

Will the United States go to war again, within the year?  

29 members have voted

  1. 1. Will the United States go to war again, within the year?

    • Yes.
      17
    • No.
      10


Recommended Posts

Guest Downhome

I simply wanted to poll you guys on this one, that is all. Since we went into Iraq, and basicly took over in short order and things have gone very well, will we now after Iraq, go after other nations such as Iran, Syria, North Korea, etc...? I am not asking for a specific, I simply mean ANY of them. Will we do so within the year, or will we wait, or even simply let them be?

 

We have done a great thing for the people of Iraq, as they are now free (at least more free than they were a month ago). Will we continue to do this sort of thing, or will we wait untill they are a threat to us?

 

Sincerely,

...Downhome...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest EricMM

The political ramifications of us going to war again would be huge.

 

I don't think it will happen again. But never say never right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Mad Dog

It depends on how mant trails lead to Syria and how much they cooperate.

 

I doubt there will be a war with North Korea, b/c they are likely to crumble before our eyes considering the country is starving.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Downhome
It depends on how mant trails lead to Syria and how much they cooperate.

 

I doubt there will be a war with North Korea, b/c they are likely to crumble before our eyes considering the country is starving.

Speaking of North Korea, how exactly does their milatary stack up against us?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Mad Dog

They outnumber us by quite a bit.

 

That's about the only advantage they have.

 

A war with them would take a few months just b/c of the size of their army but they don't have the skill or the supplies to beat us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Krotchenjudge

I hope we overthrow any government that looks at us crosseyed basically. This war in Iraq was justified, whether we find WMD or not. And since Syria couldnt stay out of it, they should be next. Let this be a lesson to anyone who dares to fuck with America. Obey the big dawgs, or get chewed up like the rest.

 

Fro Cheez,

Krotchenjudge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cobainwasmurdered
A war with them would take a few months

Yeah just like the last war you had with them eh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Powerplay

 

A war with them would take a few months

Yeah just like the last war you had with them eh?

Are you one of the people who would compare Iraq to Vietnam as well? North Korea then and now would be totally different for many of the same reasons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault
I hope we overthrow any government that looks at us crosseyed basically. This war in Iraq was justified, whether we find WMD or not. And since Syria couldnt stay out of it, they should be next. Let this be a lesson to anyone who dares to fuck with America. Obey the big dawgs, or get chewed up like the rest.

 

Fro Cheez,

Krotchenjudge

I agree with the statement, not the metod of the poster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Krotchenjudge

What does that mean? How can you agree with what I say, but not me? That makes about as much sense as saying you wouldnt have sex with Kylie Minogue.

 

Hassa Salama Lakum,

Krotchenjudge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault

Pretty much. If you were saying that under any other name but a Kotz rip off, I'd be cool with it. I think you're right. But you should change your name.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Krotchenjudge

Seriously, what would be wrong with overthrowing any oppressive regime? Syria, Libya, North Korea, Laos, Vietnam, Lebanon... the list is endless. We've done 2 in the past 18 months with such ease. If pussies like France and Germany don't like it, they can consider themselves NEXT!!!

 

 

Goldberg to France: YOU'RE NEXT. HUUUAHHHHH!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tyler McClelland

Such ease? Tell that to the soldiers that have perished and their families.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest converge241

Dude wheres your gimmick?

 

theres no "fo whatever" in that post!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Downhome
Such ease? Tell that to the soldiers that have perished and their families.

Well, considering the wars of the past and looking at this one over all, it has been done with "such ease". Not to mean it's been EASY, as a lot of shit has been going on, but considering what could have happened, and what did not, this has been a very smooth war.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault
Such ease? Tell that to the soldiers that have perished and their families.

Such is war. Neither was a disaster in regards to casualties, and both went fairly quick, so I think you could say it was somewhat easy.

 

And I don't mean to sound cold hearted, but there IS NO draft. Anyone who died enlisted, fully aware of what could possibly happen. It's still a shame, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tyler McClelland

True, but the point is that you don't want to say "Oh, that was easy, let's go do another!!!!"

 

Iraq, on some level (the level is debatable), was a threat. The world is a better place without Saddam, but the main reason we took him out is the remote threat to us. Guess what? It's not our job to go in and exterminate the world's leadership because we don't agree with them. We take out whomever poses a threat to us (via the Bush doctrine -- not my opinion, obviously), and we don't risk our soldiers' lives in other unnecessary cases.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tyler McClelland
Such ease? Tell that to the soldiers that have perished and their families.

Such is war. Neither was a disaster in regards to casualties, and both went fairly quick, so I think you could say it was somewhat easy.

 

And I don't mean to sound cold hearted, but there IS NO draft. Anyone who died enlisted, fully aware of what could possibly happen. It's still a shame, though.

Except for those people who joined because they had to... or the ones that joined to have money to go through college... or....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Krotchenjudge

You're outnumbered stinko pinko. Go protest the endangerment of the spotted turtle or something.

 

Fo Turtle Power,

Krotchenjudge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cobainwasmurdered

 

A war with them would take a few months

Yeah just like the last war you had with them eh?

Are you one of the people who would compare Iraq to Vietnam as well? North Korea then and now would be totally different for many of the same reasons.

No I don't compare Iraq and Vietnam. But North Korea would be no easy victory either. China would never stand Idly by and let you invade them, Germany,France, and Russia would also be alarmed at youre actions.

 

Also North Korea does supposedly have the Bomb now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tyler McClelland

LOLZ STINKO PINKO? THAT HURTS MAI PRYDE :(

 

One intelligent man can beat a hundred dumb sheep. Dispute my points, troll.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cobainwasmurdered
True, but the point is that you don't want to say "Oh, that was easy, let's go do another!!!!"

 

Iraq, on some level (the level is debatable), was a threat. The world is a better place without Saddam, but the main reason we took him out is the remote threat to us. Guess what? It's not our job to go in and exterminate the world's leadership because we don't agree with them. We take out whomever poses a threat to us (via the Bush doctrine -- not my opinion, obviously), and we don't risk our soldiers' lives in other unnecessary cases.

Amen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Downhome
True, but the point is that you don't want to say "Oh, that was easy, let's go do another!!!!"

 

Iraq, on some level (the level is debatable), was a threat. The world is a better place without Saddam, but the main reason we took him out is the remote threat to us. Guess what? It's not our job to go in and exterminate the world's leadership because we don't agree with them. We take out whomever poses a threat to us (via the Bush doctrine -- not my opinion, obviously), and we don't risk our soldiers' lives in other unnecessary cases.

This is a very fine line with me, it really is. I am 100% anti-war, but when it is needed, I support it. I, just like many of you here, wish that we could just go towards the future without a single drop of blooed being spilled, but that is not possible in the world we live in today. While a part of me says to leave certain nations alone and let them live their lives as they know it, another part of my says that since we are the most powerful nation on the planet, we almost owe it to our fellow man to help out those who are being treated so badly. Not to mention that most of the places that do treat their citizens so badly also have it either in for the US, and are obviously evil in the first place.

 

I don't know what to think about it, part of me says let it be, and another part of me says it's partly our duty. I'm really torn on this at times. I do look at TV however, and see much of Iraq being very thankfull for what we did, cheering us on in the streets, obviously glad that we did what we did, and very glad they can finally speek their minds and show their true feelings.

 

I wish things weren't so complicated, heh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault
Except for those people who joined because they had to...

"had to" in what way? The Government literally forced them into the armed forces.

 

or the ones that joined to have money to go through college... or....

 

In the end, it was still their decission. Even if you join at a time of peace, it still has to be in the back of your mind.

 

Iraq, on some level (the level is debatable), was a threat. The world is a better place without Saddam, but the main reason we took him out is the remote threat to us. Guess what? It's not our job to go in and exterminate the world's leadership because we don't agree with them.

 

But is it our job to feed the world? Save it from poverty? So many people have heaped that role on America.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Downhome

Just for the record, I do not think there is even a CHANCE of us going after North Korea any time soon as is. If we do anything, first will be Syria then will come Iran, and all the while we'll be doing the best we can to handle North Korea diplomatically. North Korea is an entirly different beast than Syria, Iran, and Iraq. We do not want to go into a full fledged war with them, I assure you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tyler McClelland
"had to" in what way? The Government literally forced them into the armed forces.

 

I know quite a few of my friends who were forced into the military by their parents.

 

But is it our job to feed the world? Save it from poverty? So many people have heaped that role on America.

 

Do our soldiers die when we send money and aid to other countries?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×