Guest KOR420 Report post Posted March 25, 2002 courtesy PWT -- There is a possibility of the old wCw belts returning. If the Intercontinental, European, Cruiserweight and Tag-Team Champions do not alternate between programmes, the titles will be used exclusively for RAW or Smackdown and not be moved around. Unlike the Undisputed and Women's Championship belts, This would be great,what do you think? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest dreamer420 Report post Posted March 25, 2002 I don't know about the WCW titles returning. They hold little value now. A new title would be better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Tony149 Report post Posted March 25, 2002 I wouldn't mind it. Why make new belts when you already have some. Tajiri already uses the WCW Cruiserweight Title. Let Vince have all the WWF titles, and give Flair the WCW Titles. Although I'm sure they would be called WWF or WWF Raw titles. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted March 25, 2002 KOR420, that si a very bad idea. Worst ever I think. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest muzanisa Report post Posted March 25, 2002 RAW - US title Smackdown IC title Both Tag title Raw Cruiserweight Smackdown - Hardcore Keep it at that. I think WCW is dead as a brand name now and everyone on the roster has held a title while Piper had one short intercontinental reign and Jake Roberts never held any. Let's make belts mean something again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mole Report post Posted March 26, 2002 "a title while Piper had one short intercontinental reign and Jake Roberts never held any" What the heck does that mean?? Flair's Raw shouldn't have the WCW belts, but new belts. The WCW belts don't mean anything anymore, so why not make new ones. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest muzanisa Report post Posted March 26, 2002 What I'm trying to say is that everyone on the WWF roster with the possible exception of Brock Lesnar has held some form of title. Most are multiple title holders Hurricane is a former Euro and hardcore champion. Test is a former Hardcore,Tag,Euro,IC (any others?) champion. Maven who hasn't completed his first year is a multiple hardcore champ. Titles mean nothing because like your sister everyone gets a go. When Davey Boy Smith jobbed the European to Shawn Michaels it meant something. Now if DDP loses it to Christian tonight will it matter? They should reduce the number of titles and title changes because like Piper and Roberts if you're good enough you can get over without the belt, and a belt should be a reward given to cement status not hotshotted on every show in the hope that it will get someone over. BTW I've always wanted to use that sister line. Can't even remember where I heard it. No offence meant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Tony149 Report post Posted March 26, 2002 Flair's Raw shouldn't have the WCW belts, but new belts. The WCW belts don't mean anything anymore, so why not make new ones. Making new belts cost money. The WCW belts wouldn't be called "WCW" anyway. I doubt people would care they're using the WCW belts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Masked Yodeler Report post Posted March 26, 2002 Some how I doubt a new belt costs any more than a grand. And the WWF can afford that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
