Smackdown needs a midcard title?

[Bored]

Okay before I go into the rant the tag match kicked 20 types of ass even with the DQ finish and the Benot/Hardy was very good as well.

 

But onto the discussion of needing a midcard title on Smackdown since the IC title has been brought back on Raw. Well they already have a midcard champ on SD...its Brock Lesnar! I wouldn't consider myself a fan of Brock's but he is holding what should be THE belt in the WWE so I don't know it'd be nice if they actually had him, you know, be a main eventer on the show. So he has a match tonight and first it plays second fiddle in the segment to a Vince/Mr. America confrontation to hype a fuckin' lie detector test next week. OMG I GOT TO WATCH! So Brock gets to fight a group of midcarders and has to bump like a freak on the outside for Chuck Plaumbo, who hasn't exactly been built as a major threat enough to be able to toss the WWE Champ around like a rag doll. He then has to win by DQ against Johnny Stamboli, who is pretty much a jobber at this point. Then we get the F.B.I. midcard beatdown (oh side note...can Cole come up with anything besides "numbers game"? Jesus fuckin' christ he must have said it 20 times tonight) and the WWE Champion can't overcome it. But wait...here comes a REAL main eventer in The Underatker!

 

So people there you are...YOUR WWE Midcard Champion, Brock Lesnar!

[Guest Youth N Asia]

I don't have a problem with the tag belts as midcard titles. I thought that's how they were being used anyway.

[Guest AndrewTS]

There's no secondary singles title other than the Cruiser on SD, although with Matt obviously over the weight limit they oughta turn it into a TV belt or something.

[Guest Youth N Asia]

They have too many cruisers not to have a cruiser divison...yet they never develope it like they always promise they will.