Guest OnlyMe Report post Posted June 4, 2003 WWE Screw-ups: An A-Z now up at thesmartmarks.com Feedback? Comments? Nik Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Lightning Flik Report post Posted June 4, 2003 WWE Screw-ups: An A-Z now up at thesmartmarks.com Feedback? Comments? Nik Great listing. Nice column. Except for Q, it should be. Q - Quiting Angles in Midstream. How is it that the WWE continually creates angles that build up in heat, but then go absolutely NOWHERE. [insert prime example here] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest edotherocket Report post Posted June 4, 2003 Q is for Duchess of Queensbury match: Chris Jericho v. William Regal at Backlash 2001. ...actually, Lightning Flik's is better. Its more current and actually starts with a Q. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrVenkman PhD 0 Report post Posted June 5, 2003 Q: Quebecers - Bringing back one of the greatest tag teams ever in 1998 without their (Not the) Mountie costumes and jobbing them to the Godwins. Q: Queers - The Billy and Chuck saga ending with Stephanie McMahon making out with Rikishi in drag. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Lightning Flik Report post Posted June 5, 2003 Q: Queers - The Billy and Chuck saga ending with Stephanie McMahon making out with Rikishi in drag. Ok... You beat mine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest OnlyMe Report post Posted June 5, 2003 Q: Queers - The Billy and Chuck saga ending with Stephanie McMahon making out with Rikishi in drag. Good call... that's probably my favourite so far. I *love* the caption you e-mailled to me. I'm seriously laughing out loud here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheMadmanGreg Report post Posted June 5, 2003 I really like the term "re-disputed." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mole Report post Posted June 5, 2003 That was a good column. I disagree with Survivor Series because even when they had the elimination matches, SS sucked. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest OnlyMe Report post Posted June 5, 2003 That was a good column. I disagree with Survivor Series because even when they had the elimination matches, SS sucked. True, but it was a different kind of suck. It was new and interesting suck It offered something different to all the other PPVs, and offered a reason to watch it. Now they are trying to recapture that with the Elimination Chamber, but I think Survivor Series is pretty much dead as a "Big X" PPV. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Nanks Report post Posted June 5, 2003 Not as good as the Queers one, but Q- Quick Fixes; see nWo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Report post Posted June 5, 2003 R should have been RVD...or V should have been Van DAm. Even if you hate him it's undeniable that he got WAY more over than many of the people you did bring up...and got the same treatment Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest OnlyMe Report post Posted June 5, 2003 I really wanted to include Van Dam. He fits in the same category as Jericho, really, in that they never capitalised on him. I think Ric Flair was different enough to warrant inclusion. Believe me though - I changed the letters around so many times to try and include Van Dam, Benoit and Nathan Jones Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Report post Posted June 5, 2003 But you put VISCERA at V!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest OnlyMe Report post Posted June 5, 2003 Yeah, okay, I'll give you that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Goodear Report post Posted June 5, 2003 Only problem I have is that the column is a little shallow in that it seems to be "This guy sucks, why do they push him" and "This guy rules, why don't they push him" over and over again without any deeper commentary. It's one thing to say X-Pac sucks (although I would disagree that he's always sucked) but you never say why its such a big deal or why we need to know that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest OnlyMe Report post Posted June 5, 2003 Okay, cool. It was meant to be a light-hearted, brief look. I see your point though. Thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mattdotcom Report post Posted June 5, 2003 Good column, just like your others. And on a completely unrelated note, thanks for the e-mail and liking my caption. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dynamite Kido Report post Posted June 5, 2003 Kick ass bro, just like usual!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
