Guest Mattdotcom Posted June 15, 2003 Report Posted June 15, 2003 So the major Bad Blood spoiler is "HHH is going to win"? Get the fuck out!
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 15, 2003 Report Posted June 15, 2003 This is bullshit. http://www.wrestlezone.com/articles/57705489.php (popup alert!) Matthew Boone is the king of the bullshit write-up, and he's got a few friends which do it too. Over many newsboards you can find his posts speculating that so and so has signed a contract or whatever. Usually at the bottom there's a link that says something like "***STEPHANIE NAKED*** BREAKING NEWS Hulk Hogan sent to hospital for heart failure! CLICK HERE ---_>>>>>" Basically, he gives IWC news sites a bad name and gives JR a reason to bitch and bemoan the IWC as a giant rumor mill. First off the "****STEPHANIE NAKED****" links are at the bottom of the page and anyone with any since knows their just a link to another newsboard. Not my problem you can't tell the differance. I'm sure the rest of us can. Now I only read what is posted in the news board and every, and I mean everytime there has been spoilers posted about a PPV, it was correct.
Bored Posted June 15, 2003 Report Posted June 15, 2003 This is bullshit. http://www.wrestlezone.com/articles/57705489.php (popup alert!) Matthew Boone is the king of the bullshit write-up, and he's got a few friends which do it too. Over many newsboards you can find his posts speculating that so and so has signed a contract or whatever. Usually at the bottom there's a link that says something like "***STEPHANIE NAKED*** BREAKING NEWS Hulk Hogan sent to hospital for heart failure! CLICK HERE ---_>>>>>" Basically, he gives IWC news sites a bad name and gives JR a reason to bitch and bemoan the IWC as a giant rumor mill. First off the "****STEPHANIE NAKED****" links are at the bottom of the page and anyone with any since knows their just a link to another newsboard. Not my problem you can't tell the differance. I'm sure the rest of us can. Now I only read what is posted in the news board and every, and I mean everytime there has been spoilers posted about a PPV, it was correct. Oh god...go post on the gamefaqs message board if you fall for this crap. Yes they are usually true...THAT'S BECAUSE THEY ARE STEALING!!! Sites like wrestlezone takes stories from sites like 1wrestling, The Torch, and from Da Meltz and plagerize them by just changing some words and then not crediting them. Oh and here is the gamefaqs message board where you will fit in better: http://s3.cgi.gamefaqs.com/boards/gentopic...c.asp?board=546
Guest OnlyMe Posted June 15, 2003 Report Posted June 15, 2003 Now I only read what is posted in the news board and every, and I mean everytime there has been spoilers posted about a PPV, it was correct. Prove it?
Guest cynicalprofit Posted June 15, 2003 Report Posted June 15, 2003 they should turn it into a 6 man tag with Ramon I, Diesel 1 and Goldberg vs Ramon 2, Diesel 2, and Gilberg. That would be money right there.
Guest OnlyMe Posted June 15, 2003 Report Posted June 15, 2003 Make it a Survivor Series with Undertaker and Underfaker
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 15, 2003 Report Posted June 15, 2003 (edited) This is bullshit. http://www.wrestlezone.com/articles/57705489.php (popup alert!) Matthew Boone is the king of the bullshit write-up, and he's got a few friends which do it too. Over many newsboards you can find his posts speculating that so and so has signed a contract or whatever. Usually at the bottom there's a link that says something like "***STEPHANIE NAKED*** BREAKING NEWS Hulk Hogan sent to hospital for heart failure! CLICK HERE ---_>>>>>" Basically, he gives IWC news sites a bad name and gives JR a reason to bitch and bemoan the IWC as a giant rumor mill. First off the "****STEPHANIE NAKED****" links are at the bottom of the page and anyone with any since knows their just a link to another newsboard. Not my problem you can't tell the differance. I'm sure the rest of us can. Now I only read what is posted in the news board and every, and I mean everytime there has been spoilers posted about a PPV, it was correct. Oh god...go post on the gamefaqs message board if you fall for this crap. Yes they are usually true...THAT'S BECAUSE THEY ARE STEALING!!! Sites like wrestlezone takes stories from sites like 1wrestling, The Torch, and from Da Meltz and plagerize them by just changing some words and then not crediting them. Oh and here is the gamefaqs message board where you will fit in better: http://s3.cgi.gamefaqs.com/boards/gentopic...c.asp?board=546 Do you think I care if they steal it? If you do then let me open the door and allow you to step into reality. I don't care where the information comes from. They could steal it off of Vince's desk for all I care. As long as it's correct. And so far, it has been. Edited June 15, 2003 by Johnson1620
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 Looks like my little spoiler was correct! HHH won!
Guest Kingpk Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 Uh, it said Kane was going to turn heel and cost Nash. It was wrong.
Bored Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 Looks like my little spoiler was correct! HHH won! OMG WHAT A PREDICTION! Kane turned heel too! Oh wait no he didn't.
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 It said Kane would turn heel on an "informal discussion". You people's problem's is you can't tell what you're reading. The spoiler is that HHH would win. The rest was "informal discussion". READ PEOPLE....READ!
Guest CanadianChick Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 Matt Boone is notorious for making up shit though. And saying Triple H wins isn't exactly a bold prediction.
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 Matt Boone is notorious for making up shit though. And saying Triple H wins isn't exactly a bold prediction. What I posted was worded correctly for the finish of the ppv. Now I'm sorry if these blind fools can't see that I was correct. Kane didn't turn heel, yet. But that wasn't the spoiler now was it? These monkey's just took what was posted and ran with it, instead of reading what was literally posted.
Bored Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 Matt Boone is notorious for making up shit though. And saying Triple H wins isn't exactly a bold prediction. What I posted was worded correctly for the finish of the ppv. Now I'm sorry if these blind fools can't see that I was correct. Kane didn't turn heel, yet. But that wasn't the spoiler now was it? These monkey's just took what was posted and ran with it, instead of reading what was literally posted. Again...
Guest Kingpk Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 What was "literally posted" was a sentence saying HHH is winning and then a small paragraph of speculative, probably made up, shit.
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 The speculative made up shit was worded so that these monkey's, hopefully would see it for what it was worth and see the spoiler for what it was, a spoiler of things to come.
Guest Kingpk Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 The speculative made up shit was worded so that these monkey's, hopefully would see it for what it was worth and see the spoiler for what it was, a spoiler of things to come. ......what? It said he was going to interfere in the HIAC TONIGHT and turn heel TONIGHT on Nash.
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 The speculative made up shit was worded so that these monkey's, hopefully would see it for what it was worth and see the spoiler for what it was, a spoiler of things to come. ......what? It said he was going to interfere in the HIAC TONIGHT and turn heel TONIGHT on Nash. No, it said, On that note, and realize this is just from informal discussion Now that's "take it for what it's worth" to me, and most other people who have a working brain. The earlier part said straight out HHH would win.
Guest Jobber of the Week Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 The problem is that this guy has a reputation. He has a reputation for telling bullshit half-truths and outright lies. Without guys like him, maybe Ross and McMahon could respect the internet more than they do. I used to think the IWC was crap too back in my newsboards days. Then I discovered the world of Dave, Bob, Widro, and Torch. My life is a lot better now. All of them get worked, but they don't outright lie for hits. Probably because most of them get their money from "Premium Content" and newsletters and thus don't have to lie about shit like "CHRIS JERICHO BATTLES CANCER CLICK NOW!"
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Posted June 16, 2003 Report Posted June 16, 2003 The problem is that this guy has a reputation. He has a reputation for telling bullshit half-truths and outright lies. Without guys like him, maybe Ross and McMahon could respect the internet more than they do. I used to think the IWC was crap too back in my newsboards days. Then I discovered the world of Dave, Bob, Widro, and Torch. My life is a lot better now. All of them get worked, but they don't outright lie for hits. Probably because most of them get their money from "Premium Content" and newsletters and thus don't have to lie about shit like "CHRIS JERICHO BATTLES CANCER CLICK NOW!" Hey, I understand what you're saying. I don't worry about the bullshit links they add for money. I read the newslinks and take them for what I read.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now