Guest Lightning Flik Report post Posted July 1, 2003 WWE parts ways with Crash WWE and Michael Lockwood, aka Crash Holly, have come to terms on his release so that he may pursue other interests. We wish Lockwood all the best in his future endeavors. - WWE.com __________________________________ For those wondering it's under headlines, second one below the Zach & Steph vs Big Show. Although, I've never cared for Crash. But I figured I might as well post this so everyone knows. Edit: If this has been posted, I'm sorry for reposting it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Goodear Report post Posted July 1, 2003 Finally, that should of happened years ago. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Downhome Report post Posted July 1, 2003 He almost never got the chance to showcase his skill. He'll be better off in TNA anyway, and he will be in TNA eventually. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Lightning Flik Report post Posted July 1, 2003 He almost never got the chance to showcase his skill. He'll be better off in TNA anyway, and he will be in TNA eventually. I was actually just thinking that I should probably say: Considering we'll probably see him in TNA, will he go as Crash? Or go in as Michael Lockwood? And how long till Shannon Moore is next? Considering that they split Crash from Matt and he's gone, it's only fair to say the same about Moore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Goodear Report post Posted July 1, 2003 TNA needs to stop picking up WWE castoffs and establish their own brand. Crash Holly is not going to make TNA a better company or draw a single buy of Pay Per View money. They're better off using the newer guys and try to make money off of them rather than some comedy wrestler with credibity issues. They already have two fo those in Disco and Sanders. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest RollingSambos Report post Posted July 1, 2003 He can't go as Crash because WWE owns that character... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Eagan469 Report post Posted July 1, 2003 Actually, they may own "Crash Holly", but he may be okay to wrestle as "Crash" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 1, 2003 As long as it's not gimmick infringement...and besides WHAT money is CRASH going to make? WWE could less bout Lockwood Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Polish_Rifle Report post Posted July 1, 2003 Shannon Moore is not getting cut anytime soon. If anything, he should be teamed with the Hurricane again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Amazing Rando Report post Posted July 1, 2003 Micheal Lockwood?? Is ShooterJay moonlighting? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 1, 2003 Shannon Moore is not getting cut anytime soon. If anything, he should be teamed with the Hurricane again. U know...I would mark for a ROBIN to Hurricane's Batman... Even better? Get TBS for that role. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest AndrewTS Report post Posted July 1, 2003 I thought his real name was Eric O'Grady? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 1, 2003 That was his indy name to accomodate his lepurchuan gimmk Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bob_barron Report post Posted July 1, 2003 Ummm look below guys- Already discussed Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dangerous A Report post Posted July 2, 2003 He shouldn't debut in TNA as Crash anyways. Crash was a bottom of the totem pole character. He should start fresh in TNA or they won't see him as anything but WWE leftovers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaParkaYourCar 0 Report post Posted July 2, 2003 Ummm look below guys- Already discussed Were you referring to the other thread? That one was started after this one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Lightning Flik Report post Posted July 2, 2003 Ummm look below guys- Already discussed Were you referring to the other thread? That one was started after this one. Actually he's refering to a thread that's now on pg 2 of this forum. I totally missed it because it doesn't show up on my first page. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites