The Ultimate Warrior on Hillary Clinton

[Guest MrRant]

Hello Warriors.

 

Failure to prepare is preparation to fail.

 

Living History. A book binded on a twisted, scurrilous spine of lies. A book written depending on the writing talents of others. Its subject, a woman drugged on her own self-denial and self-deceit; aside from the cosmetic body-shop job required for her face, the makeup job to cover these psychological blemishes alone must take hours. Frightening as the exterior is, trust your gut instinct on this -- the inside is ugly like hell, deep into the bone marrow. This misanthropic witch hellbent on spearheading Socialism American-Style is playing out a deal she made with the devil, making this country’s populous believe they must be dependent on a someone other than themselves. Trust me, she says, you can’t trust yourselves. After all, the smartest nag in the world scorned us -- it takes a village to raise us. Oh, come on, you know to her, we are all but children.

 

If the philosophical contents of a book truly drove the title, in the the first ghostwritten tome, “raise” would have been “ruin,”; and this book would carry “Dead Revisionism” on the jacket cover. Quite similar it is to the paradoxical tribute paid to Paul Wellstone that I pointed out moons ago, “A ‘living memorial’ is an oxymoronic idea (even an insult to Wellstone’s own life if we can believe what he believed) when the philosophy of the life he professed -- a hodgepodge of Marxism, Socialism, Communism, like-ism’s -- when brought into practice was verifiably one of despair, destruction and death. History proves this." The Clintons confuse History with histrionics, although both in the hallucinogenic Utopia they fantasize of are unscrupulously subject to endless revision. On the one hand, to erase specific truths altogether; and on the other so as to emote, convincingly, specious publicly performed responses parroting recently taken polls.

 

Mrs. Bill Clinton (MCB) is a liar, a cheap tawdry one. Oh, how un-p/c of me -- let me not apologize. In that Creatorly line to be endowed with talents, when she heard 'mendacity,' she became a pig at the trough. Couldn’t get enough of that and calumnious know-how. Her ghostwritten book, and her existence, just a blowhardy bag of lies, unctuous and vile.

 

"I could hardly breathe. Gulping for air, I started crying and yelling...” Some of us only wish she couldn’t catch her breath; makes me want to cry and yell “Injustice!” that she can. Mankind should be so fortunate to witness her final gasp for air. Obviously able to wield fantasy to suit gratuitous pretentious feelings about herself, let’s inject some honesty here. Covered head to toe in a brown burlap body bag, she’d never get any brown dog named Buddy to spend more than 15 seconds with her.

 

Forgoing physical expiration, this gaffe on the human race will one day run for the Office of the President of the United States of America. Excuse me for a moment while I look into the innocent, optimistic eyes of my children, consider their guilt-is-good, pessimistic, vice-praised, virtue-penalized ideologically perverted futures, then go puke. Thank you for the indulgence.

 

She dreams...no, correction -- she lusts... but to our Conservative credit -- it won’t happen. If she runs there will be an uprising not seen since the times of the Founding American Revolution; one, thunderously driving every leave-me-alone-let-me-live-my life Republican/Conservative-minded human being to the polls in droves. No one will have any doubt, God didn’t create us to be that stupid.

 

With all the recent media exposure for MCB’s book, Conservative pundits everywhere this side of the cow jumping over the moon have taken the proverbial creative stab at...well, really, taken an uncreative stab at nothing more than telling the same thing the same way only rearranging the same words. People get paid to do this? Where do you apply for the job?

 

Just thinking out loud here, and my own naive ignorance could have me thinking way off base, but is there a goal behind writing a column other than just the writing of it? Should there be? Especially for Conservatives? Is that goal only for Conservatives to entertain themselves? High five one another?... again, just throwing the thought out there...

 

Is there or is there not a serious intellectual war in this country over whose philosophy will be the driving force behind America (the IDEA already created)? As a Conservative are you taking the battles of that war serious? Is the most effective way of fighting the fight, really, to regurgitate, ad nauseum, litanies of factoids and long known truths readily unaccepted, unaddressed and unacknowledged (by lesions)? As for example as is being done in all these journalism pieces dissecting MCB’s book? I don’t think so. Is defeating the enemy part of the battle plan? I thought so.

 

Neither the truth or the facts matter to lesions. In their lesson books, relativity has nothing to do with Einstein; everything to do with getting around reality, or ‘out of’ the factual truths. This has been said over and over and over and over by all Conservatives. Never can it be said enough. But...is that enough? And especially after two go rounds of over and over. After all, in the name of Clinton, is lying new and are these new lies? Negative on both accounts.

 

There’s a different level to the fight, one that as a concerned Conservative I’m wondering if our most intellectually able Conservatives (not me) are fighting well enough. Truth is, although public awareness of Conservative ideas is on an incline, lesionism’s detrimental impact on human behavior is not lessening one bit -- it grows as if on Growth Hormone.

 

Sunday evening I caught the tail end of a CSpan program covering a debate between Molly Ivins?, Bill O’Reilly and Al Franken. The half hour I saw was a testament to the estrangement existent between Conservative and lesionist philosophies, ergo, chasm between reality and fantasy. Unbelievable. The Conservative voice is being more heard, yes, but lesionism's deteriorating assault on what is true, what is reality, is not slowing down one bit. It is horrific and getting worse. They claim Conservatives are taking human rights away across the board, but somehow overlook that their goal to make human beings dependent on others than themselves (refusal to take responsibility for themselves), leads to the usurpation of the primary right to begin with -- one’s right to live his life for himself. If your life is not yours to live anyway, there are no other rights. Other rights do not exist.

 

This rapid, degenerate evasion of reality is in many ways, I believe, directly related to Conservative focus on short term battling; and lack of long term war planning.

 

There is a misconception, often times perpetuated by conservatives themselves, that Conservatism is a new fad, voguish. That its ideas are just now in recent years coming into fashion. That is not true. Conservatism, philosophically mind you (here), has always been there, working behind the scenes. That we hear more public conversation about Conservatism today (esp in the media) has less to do with an increase in the numbers of conservative-minded people, and that they are just now speaking out (albeit this is happening too), than it does about the fact that what is right, true and good is what advancement in society has always depended on, i.e., the philosophy of Conservatism. The intrinsic power of those virtues to propel advancement was always there. There are the sine qua nons of doing so. What is correct and effective is what has always powered societal progress that truly benefits mankind, not their opposites. Conservatism, as it is traditionally defined, is what promotes, protects and preserves these virtues. Lesionism works at tearing them down, always has. (That lesionism is dubbed “progressive” is a dirty joke without competition. Even everything lesionism has ever done with an “intent of doing good,” as lesionism puts it, has turned into something nastier than hell. In truth, the only thing ever created by lesionism is the “road paved to hell with good intentions.”)

 

However, for years lesionism has simply had the forums to drown out almost all public conservative voice; contending otherwise, as liberals despising the one network of Fox News do today, is fatuous and devoid. Is there any stronger attestation to the power of Conservatism than juxtaposing its relatively recent emergence in very limited media forums next to decades of lesionism's media strongholds? Lesionism, in truth, has always parasitically subsidized itself riding on the back of Conservatism. Like the parent always picking up after the messy kid. While lesionism experiments with newfangled ways to tear things down, Conservatism has always been behind the scenes cleaning up and building anew.

 

"Socialism is not in the least what it pretends to be. It is not the pioneer of a better and finer world, but the spoiler of what thousands of years of civilization have created. It does not build, it destroys. For destruction is the essence of it. It produces nothing, it only consumes what the social order based on private ownership in the means of production has created." -- Ludwig von Mises

 

Lesions should bow to us that are living by conservative philosophies of life. Kiss the ground we walk on -- ok, at least say thank you. Thank you? Yes. Thank me and all the other Conservative people who think and behave in a sane, moral, non-ignorant manner. Thank us for sustaining a "safe zone" that allows lesions to think and act as ignorant as they want to be. And, add while we are at it -- allows others to think and act irreverent, stupid, indecent, uncivil, immoral, dishonorable and on and on. So, thank me and other Conservatives, also, for being reverent, decent, civil, moral, honorable and on and on.

 

Aside from the existence of the principles of this country, which allows degenerate ignorance and stupidity up to a certain point, the "safe zone" they have to practice their freedom and their right to behave like idiots comes directly from those others of us who do in our thinking and acting the exact opposite. That’s right. You heard me correctly. Only those who have moral restraint and conduct themselves sanely provide a balance to the world offsetting the overwhelming wacky behavior going on.

 

‘Cause you see, the way the rules are now -- built on the basis that there is a right and a wrong, that there is a true and a false and that there is a good and an evil, that there is civil and uncivil, that there is decent and indecent, that there is reverent and irreverent and all the other alternatives on and on -- society is absent TOTAL anarchy. But if thinking, correct conclusions, and positive outcomes are not part of the equation anymore, at all -- those liberals getting away with ignorance and all the other feel-good-isms, today, will not even have a voice, except a quivering one, when all hell breaks loose. But, I digress...

 

Now that we do have a public voice, my question is, are we using it the most effectively? Especially the daily production of tit-for-tat journalism articles?

 

That is why I ask, is being an information handler really living up to the respect we should have for our Conservative selves? Doesn’t what we want to preserve depend on more (deserve better) than the quotidian bantering back and forth of redundant, worn out articles of information? Is what we say we are fighting for different from what we are truly fighting for? That is not to say we don’t need to present the information, the disputations to beat back the ceaseless barrage of lies. But is that the only vault of knowledge we have to turn to? Need to turn to? Are none embarrassed by the shallowness of submitting slight intellectual effort?

 

Where’s the beef? Where is the foundationally substantive thread of the tradition Conservatism claims it wants to preserve? Shouldn’t all Conservatives always strive to teach that, even if only in small doses?

 

Detailing the lies Mrs. Bill Clinton is caught in is not enough. Information is rudimentary education, it is not enlightenment. It is not adequately addressing the follow through the end goal Conservatism depends on -- preserving traditional America. It is incumbent on those who are enlightened not just to point out the liars and their lies but also tell why the character of a person who lies matters to our society (and each individual life comprising it) and the government governing it.

 

Western civilization learning and American history is inspiring! Conservatives who know it need to step up to the plate and be the Inspirators leading a 21st century American charge!! Where else will this inspiration come from to combat: "The only new thing in this world is the history you do not know."

 

Who will inspire others to think what Montaigne knew: “In truth lying is an accursed vice. We are men, and hold together, only by our word. If we recognized the horror and the gravity of lying, we would prosecute it with the fire more justly than other crimes. If falsehood, like truth, had only one face...we would take as certain the opposite of what the liar said. But the reverse of truth has a hundred thousand shapes and a limitless field. The good is certain and finite, evil infinite and uncertain. A thousand paths miss the target, one goes for it. We are better off in the company of a dog we know than a man whose language we do not know.”

 

Who will inspire our future generations of leaders into concise determinations such as the battle-hardened warrior Achilles held: “I hate that man like the very Gates of Death who says one thing but hides another in his heart.”

 

Who will pass on the prophetic thinking of our Founding Fathers:

 

“It is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth - and listen to the song of that syren, till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those, who having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it might cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.” Henry, Patrick

 

“Public virtue cannot exist in a nation without private, and public virtue is the only foundation of republics. There must be a positive passion for the public good, the public interest, honour, power and glory, established in the minds of the people, or there can be no republican government, nor any real liberty: and this public passion must be superiour to all private passions.” Adams, John

 

“Since private and publick Vices, are in Reality, though not always apparently, so nearly connected, of how much Importance, how necessary is it, that the utmost Pains be taken by the Publick, to have the Principles of Virtue early inculcated on the Minds even of children, and the moral Sense kept alive, and that the wise institutions of our Ancestors for these great Purposes be encouraged by the Government. For no people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffusd and Virtue is preservd. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauchd in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders.” Adams, Samuel

 

“It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself.” Jefferson, Thomas

 

Who will if you won't?

 

Are we by our lack of (thorough) preparation preparing to fail?

 

Your Founding Father of Ring Intensity -- Always Believe, Warrior

[Guest Vern Gagne]

[Guest kkktookmybabyaway]

Wow.

 

I wonder if he does this all in one sitting?...

[Guest Downhome]

The Ultimate Warrior is my hero!

[Guest JMA]

What a fucking psycho. That's Jim Hellwig for ya...

[Guest Jobber of the Week]

There is a misconception, often times perpetuated by conservatives themselves, that Conservatism is a new fad

 

What the hell?

 

 

 

 

Regardless, the fact that Ultimate Warrior disagrees with my political views gives me more faith that I have been correct all along.

[Guest ISportsFan]

Regardless, the fact that Ultimate Warrior disagrees with my political views gives me more faith that I have been correct all along.

How can you tell he disagrees with your political views? I can't understand one word in there.

 

Jason

[Guest Tyler McClelland]

If anyone gives this guy more credit than Martin Sheen or Janine Garafolo.......

[Guest Jobber of the Week]

How can you tell he disagrees with your political views? I can't understand one word in there.

 

Jason

He got mad at people bashing Fox News, something I've done in the past.

 

 

 

Something a lot of Conservatives I know have done in the past as well.

 

 

 

I'll just assume he hates all of us then.

[Guest Jobber of the Week]

If anyone gives this guy more credit than Martin Sheen or Janine Garafolo.......

Whoa. When I wasn't looking, your avatar changed, then it got smaller, and smaller again....

 

 

Do you have the Incredible Shrinking Dean Ad or something?

[Guest Tyler McClelland]

Well, it looked really ugly large

 

I'm just adding now because I work for their campaign as of tonight. Rawk.

[Guest MrRant]

A response is in order.

[Guest JMA]

Hm. I've just read Dean's platform on the site. It's pretty good. He's pro-choice, doesn't hate gays, ect. Seems like a pretty cool guy.

[Guest Razor Roman]

First Warrior rant I ever comprehended. Even agreed with a good portion of it.

 

They should have had HIM debate Chris Nowinski on RAW

[Guest JMA]

I'm really glad he's not on our side. How embarassing. I heard he and Gordon Liddy talk at college campuses. That sounds like it would be entertaining. But seriously, did anyone think Warrior could be any more demented? He's gone from regular wacko to ultra-right wacko.

[Guest Tyler McClelland]

I bet he starts shaking and no-selling when he watches Hannity and Colmes.

[Guest MD2020]

My roommate and his family are Republicans. About a month ago, his father gave him a subscription to the National Review. Anyhow, we get this week's issue in a couple days ago. He's flipping through it, and then he just stops...

 

Turns out, there's a pretty big Republican conference coming up shortly at George Washington Univ. They have a listing of many of the speakers who will be there--Ann Coutler, G. Gordon Liddy, some syndicated columnists, etc. However, also speaking will be "Former WWF Champion Warrior". That's how they listed him--Former WWF Champion Warrior. At least his picture is normal, i.e. no paint or anything.

 

I'm almost tempted to go down there, put on some face paint and tassels, and cheer when he speaks.

[Guest kkktookmybabyaway]

Oh man -- I hope his seminar/speech gets played on C-Span...

[Guest Tyler McClelland]

"See the ULTIMATE WARRIOR~!! give liberals the BODY SPLASH~!~!~!~!~!"

[Guest JMA]

I'd like to go there just to throw tomatoes at Ann Coulter. Anyway, I expect Warrior to embarrass himself and the people he supports. It should be funny.

[Guest Tyler McClelland]

Next thing you know, he'll have his own show on Faux News.

[Guest Agent of Oblivion]

"...AND BY MY GODS THE LIBERALS ARE RUINING THIS NATION! IT IS OUR DESTINY TO VOTE CONSERVATIVE~!"

[Guest ISportsFan]

How can you tell he disagrees with your political views?  I can't understand one word in there.

 

Jason

He got mad at people bashing Fox News, something I've done in the past.

 

 

 

Something a lot of Conservatives I know have done in the past as well.

 

 

 

I'll just assume he hates all of us then.

I wuz being sarcastic. Sorry 'bout the misunderstanding.

 

Jason