Guest Kingpk Report post Posted February 8, 2002 Has anyone seen this yet? Salma Hayek is in it and she's bisexual. That's the only good thing I can say about this movie. The "quirk" about this movie is that it was shot with digital video and the screen is split into 4 boxes, each has a separate scene or various angles of the same scene (like "Twenty-Four" has). The problem is that sometimes the scenes overlap and it's really confusing to keep up with what is happening. Plus, the choices for scenes are really strange. For instance, there's a scene in one box where Hayek is screwing this guy behind a movie screen (the movie takes place at "Red Mullet Productions") in a screening room. In another are executives watching some film on the screen they are behind. In another? A girl is book shopping. What the hell? Oh yeah, don't ask me about the plot, I couldn't tell you what the hell was going on, I just wanted to see Hayek in a low cut shirt showing major cleavage. See my sig for my final thoughts on this movie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Big McLargeHuge Report post Posted February 8, 2002 I'd have to agree. I was watching this while on vacation (on cinemax or something) and for the life of me couldn't figure out what was going on. After Salma Hayek boned that dude, I changed it. I was hoping to see her tits, but no such luck. Worst Movie Ever? Maybe, but Werewolf is still up there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest VerbalKint Report post Posted February 8, 2002 I've heard about it but never seen it. I think the whole "gimmick" of it is very intreguing. 90 minutes, no cuts, real time, four screens. very cool. But I can totally imagine how difficult it must have been to pull off and i can imagine tha it sucks ass. I've read that they ahd to shoot the entire movie like 12 times until they got a usuable take. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
