Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted July 13, 2003 http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/s...all/6291065.htm Glass, owner of the surprising first-place Royals, is intent on bringing the glamour game back to Kauffman Stadium, where it was last held in 1973. "I will push for the first available year that there isn't a firm commitment and see what we could get done," Glass said. "I think it would be great to have one here and that our fans would really support it. It's a much bigger event today than in '73 when we had it." Glass' first call was to commissioner and friend Bud Selig, who makes the decision on the All-Star site. "Bud got a little defensive with me but said that he certainly understood and sympathized with Kansas City and that he would put us on the list," Glass said. In recent years, Selig has favored new stadiums for the game, and if that trend continues, Kansas City could have quite a wait. Hopefully KC can get the game in 2005 over Detroit. That bastard Selig isn't going to try and sway us, our stadium is perfectly fine right now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest kkktookmybabyaway Report post Posted July 13, 2003 The only comment I have for this story is that I find it funny how someone that used to be WAL-MART's CEO whines about his team being crushed by richer, bigger competitors... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 13, 2003 Bah...Bring it to Cincy... Can't you just see ESPN and MLB drooling for that Home Run Exhibition? It's an much better looking stadium and you have baseball history there... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted July 13, 2003 Cincy can have it in 2006, if they can beat PNC Park, Pac Bell Park and the other competitors. 2004 is at Enron Field. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 13, 2003 Since 2004 is Houston... That means 2005 is an A.L team... Fine go ahead with KC but K.C isn't that good of a stadium... Pittsburgh shouldn't get a ALL-STAR game until they have a team... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Czech Republic Report post Posted July 13, 2003 Pac Bell, Wrigley, and GAB should be the next three. I understand wanting to play in a newer nicer ballpark, but that argument gets thrown on the window when you put the All-Star Game on the South Side. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted July 13, 2003 Fine go ahead with KC but K.C isn't that good of a stadium You've never really been there or seen it, have you? What's not that good about it? "Pac Bell, Wrigley, and GAB should be the next three" The All-Star stadiums go NL/AL, NL in even-numbered years, AL in odd-numbered years. The next four sites after 2004 should be Kauffman (2005), Pac Bell (2006), Edison International or Comerica (2007) and GAB or Phillies Field or maybe San Diego's stadium. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest alkeiper Report post Posted July 14, 2003 I've never been to Kaufmann Stadium, but I've heard nothing but praise. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Czech Republic Report post Posted July 14, 2003 "Pac Bell, Wrigley, and GAB should be the next three" The All-Star stadiums go NL/AL, NL in even-numbered years, AL in odd-numbered years. Upon further investigation I notice that I forgot the important words "either" before the sentence and "one of" before "the next 3." Anyhoo, Comiskey is a shithole. 2004: Minute Maid Park I propose: 2005: Kaufmann Stadium 2006: Great American Ballpark 2007: Arlington Ballpark 2008: Pacific Bell Park If Wrigley makes it to 2014, knock on wood, there's NO other place to put the All-Star Game. It'll be the park's centennial. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest alkeiper Report post Posted July 14, 2003 Give one to Busch Stadium. I don't know why St. Louis doesn't ever hold one. They haven't hosted the game since 1966. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MaxPower27 Report post Posted July 14, 2003 STL is a great baseball city too. Very supportive of their team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bored 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2003 "Pac Bell, Wrigley, and GAB should be the next three" The All-Star stadiums go NL/AL, NL in even-numbered years, AL in odd-numbered years. Upon further investigation I notice that I forgot the important words "either" before the sentence and "one of" before "the next 3." Anyhoo, Comiskey is a shithole. 2004: Minute Maid Park I propose: 2005: Kaufmann Stadium 2006: Great American Ballpark 2007: Arlington Ballpark 2008: Pacific Bell Park If Wrigley makes it to 2014, knock on wood, there's NO other place to put the All-Star Game. It'll be the park's centennial. No way Arlington gets the game in 2007 as they hosted in '95. Comerica will definently have it then if it doesn't get 2005. After 2007 though I have no clue where they will put in the AL since there are no new parks on the horizon in the league so probably go to like Yankee Stadium since I can't remember the last time they hosted it. As for future options for the NL: Pac Bell (SBC starting next year) - San Francisco hosted in '84 PNC - Pittsburgh hosted in '94 Bank One - Arizona has never hosted Great American Park - Cincinnati hosted in '88 New Philadelphia Park - last hosted in '96 New San Diego Park - last hosted in '92 Wrigley - last hosted in '90 Dodger Stadium - last hosted in '80 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest kkktookmybabyaway Report post Posted July 14, 2003 Just curious -- how does MLB decide where the All-Star game is hosted? Do they just have a set schedule or what?... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Czech Republic Report post Posted July 14, 2003 Give one to Busch Stadium. I don't know why St. Louis doesn't ever hold one. They haven't hosted the game since 1966. Give them a game when the new place opens up. Busch Stadium is a dump. I don't care if Wrigley had the game in '90, they're getting it for the 100th anniversiary if they make it that long. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 14, 2003 ^ St. Louis was planned for 2006 at one point but they backed out because of some reason... Which is why Cincy and Pac Bell are the lead candiates for that slot Share this post Link to post Share on other sites