Guest evlpurpose Report post Posted July 22, 2003 The clip lasts one hour. If you fastforward to the end of that clip and wait all the way till the end a new clip loads. That clip is the second hour. If you do the same for this clip, you will get a third clip of the Warrior. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mattdotcom Report post Posted July 22, 2003 He graduated from Warrior U, Rico. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted July 22, 2003 LMAO, true that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dmann2000 Report post Posted July 22, 2003 Okay if 10 years ago we were told that- Ted DiBiase would be a Born Again preacher Cactus Jack would be a NY Times bestselling author Jesse Ventura would be a former governor of Minnesota Ultimate Warrior would be a Conservative campus speaker Who'd have believed it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GameCop Report post Posted July 22, 2003 that's a good point, dmann Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dmann2000 Report post Posted July 22, 2003 Someone with a better knowledge of conservative political ideologies please write a parody of Warrior cutting a promo on conservative politics. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted July 22, 2003 So according to Warrior's speech, Vince McMahon is the ultimate evil Liberal? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest BobBacklundRules Report post Posted July 22, 2003 Holy crap, he does looks like bradshaw but with test's old long hair, and austin's facial hair, and elf ears. He's slimmed down a lot, no more steriods. For some reason when I've read his meaningless rants on his website, I've pictured the old warrior with facepaint and all. It's weird, I used to be a huge mark for him when I was little. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted July 22, 2003 Oh they have meaning alright, but he's made it a fucking puzzle with the words he uses in the way he structures his rants so unless you're Albert Einstein or have a PH.D in English literature / Political science, your brain is fucked because you can't understand what the fuck he basically trying to say. Believe me, I find it very difficult to see his reasoning. He has all the qualities of a university professor, maybe he should just stay in one place. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GameCop Report post Posted July 22, 2003 He's such a mark for himself, though. He used the words "warrior" and "ultimate" in at least three or four sentences. I pretty much understood what Warrior was trying to convey in the first five minutes. If you watch it the entire way through, you'll notice that his speech is extremely redundant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest BDC Report post Posted July 22, 2003 It is VERY redundant. I didn't have much work today in the office (Senate in DC) so we watched it on one of the LC's computers and I laughed my BUTT off. After a while, it's almost a broken record, except he has unnecessarily long words switched out for the $50 equivalent. I understood what he was saying... but his point was kind of meandering. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Superstar Report post Posted July 22, 2003 This is GOLDEN, folks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Shanghai Kid Report post Posted July 22, 2003 As I said in another thread, I know Smarks like to make fun of Warrior but he's probably tons smarter than any of us. I mean, his range of vocab alone is f'n amazing. If you understand what he's saying that you might get under the impression that he's a f'n genius. Dumb as he may look, he's as intelligent as any scholars in wrestling history. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GameCop Report post Posted July 22, 2003 Even more amazing, this is from a guy who had to be blockaded by WWF personnel to finish his promos. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 22, 2003 I kinda dug it... I would dig it if he ran for office. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest DeputyHawk Report post Posted July 22, 2003 [bob] they complain and complain and complain and complain and complaaaiiinnn [/roberts] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest JMA Report post Posted July 22, 2003 What Warrior has been saying just sounds like Rush Limbaugh rhetoric. It's too bad Rick Rude isn't around to knock him on his ass again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest godthedog Report post Posted July 22, 2003 if anyone's interested, c-span's replaying the whole afternoon right now. reginald jones is speaking at the moment, so warrior will probably be on in about 20 minutes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest godthedog Report post Posted July 22, 2003 (edited) As I said in another thread, I know Smarks like to make fun of Warrior but he's probably tons smarter than any of us. I mean, his range of vocab alone is f'n amazing. If you understand what he's saying that you might get under the impression that he's a f'n genius. Dumb as he may look, he's as intelligent as any scholars in wrestling history. n-word, please. warrior could have a bigger vocabulary than james joyce and it wouldn't change shit, because this man does not know how to make an argument. anybody who's taken critical reasoning 101 could plow through his sophistic shit like the grim reaper plowing through an old folks home. he argues to straw men so many times that it goes beyond "funny," into "scary," and back to "funny" again. he likes to show off his vocabulary, plain and simple. i've read his diatribes: he rambles and rambles on and on, and any point he actual argument tries to make is lost in rhetoric. he ranted for ten minutes about how liberalism is, literally, evil, making claim after claim after claim about it. what arguments did he use to actually BACK UP this claim? NONE. not a single god damn actual argument. he went on for ten more minutes about how important it is to form one's philosophy by rigid, logical standards. and what did he do to spell out this particular philosophy he advocates? a laughably simple notion of "keeping whatever works" and "common sense." his account of the history of natural rights is just plain wrong. this fucker is a charlatan, pure and simple. he pretends to brandish logic as a valuable tool, and proceeds to not use any logic at all. he insults my intelligence. Edited July 22, 2003 by godthedog Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bob_barron Report post Posted July 22, 2003 This is the funniest thing I've ever seen. I love Warrior Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 22, 2003 Oh C'mon u know YOU love it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest godthedog Report post Posted July 22, 2003 oh, now he's quoting socrates. well, he's quoting plato quoting socrates, equating SOCRATES with conservatism and the people who killed him with liberalism. fuck you, hellwig. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest jester Report post Posted July 22, 2003 As I said in another thread, I know Smarks like to make fun of Warrior but he's probably tons smarter than any of us. I mean, his range of vocab alone is f'n amazing. If you understand what he's saying that you might get under the impression that he's a f'n genius. Dumb as he may look, he's as intelligent as any scholars in wrestling history. n-word, please. warrior could have a bigger vocabulary than james joyce and it wouldn't change shit, because this man does not know how to make an argument. anybody who's taken critical reasoning 101 could plow through his sophistic shit like the grim reaper plowing through an old folks home. he likes to show off his vocabulary, plain and simple. i've read his diatribes: he rambles and rambles on and on, and any point he actual argument tries to make is lost in rhetoric. he ranted for ten minutes about how liberalism is, literally, evil, making claim after claim after claim about it. what arguments did he use to actually BACK UP this claim? NONE. not a single god damn actual argument. he went on for ten more minutes about how important it is to form one's philosophy by rigid, logical standards. and what did he do to spell out this particular philosophy he advocates? a laughably simple notion of "keeping whatever works" and "common sense." his account of the history of natural rights is just plain wrong. this fucker is a charlatan, pure and simple. he pretends to brandish logic as a valuable tool, and proceeds to not use any logic at all. he insults my intelligence. My feelings about Jimmy Hellwig and his "intelligence" can be summed up by quoting "A Fish Called Wanda": "Apes don't read philosophy!" "Yes they do, Otto. They just don't understand it!" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Askewniverse Report post Posted July 22, 2003 Did Warrior spout any of that "destrucity" crap? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 22, 2003 Nope...Just your standard Conservative shit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GameCop Report post Posted July 22, 2003 Right, Warrior rarely backed up his claims with valid facts or presumptions. Instead, he talked about how liberalism will eventually kill us all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Coffey Report post Posted July 22, 2003 Linked from good ol Dave. Peanut Butter Jelly time! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted July 22, 2003 I'm still perplexed to see Warrior in a Suit... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites