Guest Agent of Oblivion Report post Posted July 28, 2003 They recombined it and Misawa/Kobashi from 1/20 wasn't even the top FIVE? Fuck you RSPW... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest La Parka Es Mi Papa Report post Posted July 28, 2003 Beleive it ot not, I've only seen Hart/Austin out of those three, but it rocks my fucking socks, and I can't imagine Rey/Eddie or Michaels/Taker beating it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Ingram Paladin Report post Posted August 1, 2003 Beleive it ot not, I've only seen Hart/Austin out of those three, but it rocks my fucking socks, and I can't imagine Rey/Eddie or Michaels/Taker beating it. Guerrero/Mysterio does. Trust me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest alfdogg Report post Posted August 1, 2003 I've never seen Rey-Eddie in its entirety, but sadly I can't see myself enjoying it more than I enjoy and still do enjoy Hart-Austin. And I agree with HartFan86. The 10-man may not have been a classic from a technical standpoint, but the crowd heat was greater than I've ever seen for a match, and that's what makes it so enjoyable for me. Rock-Hogan and Rock-Austin from WMX7 are the only ones I can think of right now that can rival the heat for that match. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Agent of Oblivion Report post Posted August 7, 2003 10 man tag on Raw in early 2000. Rock, Foley and pals vs. evil motivated HHH and pals. Same formula done infinitely better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iliketurtles 0 Report post Posted August 8, 2003 Yeah, but that was 2000...so no one gives a shit because we are talking about 1997 and that match didn't even happen yet. Just because there was a better match 3 years later still shouldn't take the fact the 10 Man Canadian Stampede match was pretty damn good for 1997 standards. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest two_tuff_toddy Report post Posted August 8, 2003 "Just because there was a better match 3 years later still shouldn't take the fact the 10 Man Canadian Stampede match was pretty damn good for 1997 standards" Saying a match is good for 97 standards when 97 standards sucked other than a few notible exceptions does not make it good. I have to agree with AoO that the 00 match was light years better and also had pretty intense growd heat. As for moty, I would say it's Misawa/Kobashi 1/20/97 by a landslide as it is the 2nd best match ever in my opinion. If your just talking NA though I would say Rey-Eddy followed by Austin-Hart. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Agent of Oblivion Report post Posted August 8, 2003 Yeah, but that was 2000...so no one gives a shit because we are talking about 1997 and that match didn't even happen yet. Just because there was a better match 3 years later still shouldn't take the fact the 10 Man Canadian Stampede match was pretty damn good for 1997 standards. The time period isn't the point I was trying to make. I'm saying that 10 wrestlers on similar stages of the roster, with a similar feud, under nearly the same circumstances completely killed that match. Rating a match against similar matches is a necessity to me. There's no sense in looking at something without any context. Hell, I don't think the CS 10 man is even the best match on the card, let alone the year. The match was fluff with story and noise..that's it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheOriginalOrangeGoblin 0 Report post Posted August 21, 2003 I LOVE the CS 10 man but it's not MOTY. Although I'd agree with HartFan on it being my personal MOTY(favorite match ever actually). I've never seen Rey/Eddie in its entirety and I find Bret/Austin inferior to Survivor Series. HBK/Taker is overrated, period. Other matches that I'd rank right up there with HBK/Taker and Bret/Austin is the Final 4 match and Taka/Sasuke from CS. Meh I guess Bret/Austin but it's inferior to Survivor Series(the CLEAR 1996 NA MOTY). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
