Guest cobainwasmurdered Report post Posted July 25, 2003 yeah cause the chick SURELY wanted to be raped. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Retro Rob Report post Posted July 25, 2003 yeah cause the chick SURELY wanted to be raped. Of course she did. She wanted to MEET him. You know what that means. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest cobainwasmurdered Report post Posted July 25, 2003 yeah cause the chick SURELY wanted to be raped. Of course she did. She wanted to MEET him. You know what that means. Indeed. Because every woman MUST want to sleep with a star eh? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Tyler McClelland Report post Posted July 25, 2003 ... What? First he was Smarkzone and now he's Robstone? Or maybe he's some sort of hideously brain-damaged lovechild of the pair that loves the Kliq and Test and has utterly backward views? His debate style mirrors Robstone's. I don't even know who Smarkzone is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Retro Rob Report post Posted July 25, 2003 I don't even know who Smarkzone is. Consider yourself one of the lucky ones. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted July 25, 2003 Well... 1 down 2 to go. Rico and Johnson better be on their toes. Leave me out of this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Agent of Oblivion Report post Posted July 26, 2003 ... What? First he was Smarkzone and now he's Robstone? Or maybe he's some sort of hideously brain-damaged lovechild of the pair that loves the Kliq and Test and has utterly backward views? His debate style mirrors Robstone's.... Jesus, it DOES, only without Pat Buchanan. Example.. Robstone, from the quasi famous thread about terrorists and a lesbian god... I could care less about what you ass's think. I cannot prove my theories and that is fine. I let faith do that for me. But, you can't prove yours either so I guess we will be talking about this for a while. --Rob Johnson, earlier in this thread... Because you have yet to prove that the facts I based my opinion on aren't facts. Just to save you some finger strength, you can't You're like a child who wanders into the middle of a movie... With the EXACT same "Uh-huh!" "Nuh-UH!" style of "argument" of someone of similar age. Please accept the fact that you have absolutely NO idea what the fuck you're talking about, and that you NEVER had ANY idea what the fuck you're talking about. You've been proved repeatedly in this thread to be a dumbass, please have the kindness, and the scrote, to admit THAT, at least. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Report post Posted July 26, 2003 With the EXACT same "Uh-huh!" "Nuh-UH!" style of "argument" of someone of similar age. Please accept the fact that you have absolutely NO idea what the fuck you're talking about, and that you NEVER had ANY idea what the fuck you're talking about. You've been proved repeatedly in this thread to be a dumbass, please have the kindness, and the scrote, to admit THAT, at least. By you saying what I quoted shows you are actually the one with no clue. If you read the entire post you would see that my argument was strong enough to stand on the facts I presented earlier. It's not my fault that the kids around here can't admit when they are wrong. And before you say that I can't either, I can and I have before and if I was wrong in this case I would admit it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
