Guest kkktookmybabyaway Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 Hmm, I remember a TV interview with a telemarketer rep who said that they already have no-call checks and balances system in place -- "why would the industry want to call people that don't want their business?" was his reasoning. Going by that logic you would figure the telemarketing industry would LOVE the national do-not-call list... http://www.msnbc.com/news/945151.asp WASHINGTON, July 28 — Telemarketers expanded their legal challenge to the government’s do-not-call list, suing a second federal agency over the call-blocking service for consumers that the industry says will devastate business and cost up to two million jobs. THE FREE GOVERNMENT REGISTRY for blocking telephone sales pitches has grown to more than 28 million numbers since it was opened June 27, according to the Federal Trade Commission, which operates the service. The FTC has predicted registration to grow to 60 million numbers by next summer. The American Teleservices Association, an industry group that sued the FTC in January to stop the list, asked the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver on Friday to reject new regulations set by the Federal Communications Commission. The FCC added its authority to the list to close regulatory loopholes and block calls from certain industries, including airlines, banks and telephone companies. “This truly is a case of regulatory overkill,” said Tim Searcy, ATA executive director. “The FCC ignored its obligations under the federal law and the Constitution to carefully balance the privacy interests of consumers with the First Amendment rights of legitimate telemarketers.” People who sign up this summer should see a decrease in telemarketing calls after the FTC begins enforcing the list Oct. 1. The service will block about 80 percent of the calls, the FTC said. The telemarketing industry estimates the do-not-call list could cut its business in half, costing it up to $50 billion in sales each year. Implementing the list could also eliminate up to two million jobs, the ATA said. The ATA also asked the FCC on Friday to stay enforcement of its rules until the court can review them. No court date has been set for the case against the FTC, the group said. Similar lawsuits brought by other telemarketers are pending. There are about 166 million residential phone numbers in the United States, the FTC said, and the wireless industry estimates there are more than 147 million U.S. cell phone numbers. More than a dozen states with do-not-call lists plan to add their lists to the national registry this summer, the FTC said. Consumers on those lists need not register again. Beginning in September, telemarketers will have to check the list every three months to see who doesn’t want to be called. Those who call listed people could be fined up to $11,000 for each violation. Consumers would file complaints to an automated phone or online system. Exemptions from the list include calls from charities and pollsters and calls on behalf of politicians. A company also may call a person on the no-call list if that person has bought, leased or rented from the company within the past 18 months or has inquired about or applied for something during the past three months. People can register for the service by calling toll-free at 1-888-382-1222 or visiting the http://www.donotcall.gov Web site.
Guest Plushy Al Logan Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 Telemarketers can go fuck themselves.
Guest Lightning Flik Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 They are suing because their First Amendment is taken away? Um, sorry, but freedom of speech (I do believe that's the first one, right) doesn't include repeatedly phoning people to force them to buy stuff. Telemarketers... Gotta hate them.
Guest kkktookmybabyaway Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 For anyone out there, I toss the following question: When the telemarketing industry talks about all the money it makes, does that include, say, credit card companies pimping you an offer when you go to activate your card? Just curious...
Guest Crucifixio Jones Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 Even more than telemarketers (who I don't get call from all that much but BOY do I get FAXES..ARGH!) fuck the local police and fire departments who can be just as annoying, calling up and asking for donations and simply will not take no for an answer.
Guest kkktookmybabyaway Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 I've heard that's a scam. And yes, that is annoying. We wouldn't need Big Brother if everyone just had caller ID...
Guest Bosstones Fan Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 We wouldn't need Big Brother if everyone just had caller ID... Caller ID doesn't always work. Lots of telemarketers hide their name and phone numbers on the caller id so you don't know who's calling. Come to think of it...maybe we should make their hiding of their identifiers illegal. At least then I wouldn't have to answer the phone if I didn't want to. Problem solved on my end.
Guest kkktookmybabyaway Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 I'd go with that. If I don't recognize the number on my ID, I don't pick it up. Here's one thing that's starting to get my panties in a knot -- those blasted recorded messages saying that some Direct TV-type company is making a stop in my neighborhood and would like to hook me up with 4,000 stations for $5 per month, or something of the sort...
Guest MaxPower27 Posted July 29, 2003 Report Posted July 29, 2003 My call ID picks it up as "Unknown" Since nobody that calls me has "Unknown" as their number and name, I just don't answer it.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now