Guest JMA Report post Posted August 10, 2003 Why were the FBI there? The FBI, heels, obviously are supposed to be against the faces. Brock is a face. The FBI have beaten down faces several times in the past 6 months. Why would they care if another good guy was down and not just look at him like "oh, haha"? I saw Nunzio applauding. Perhaps they were admiring the apparent beat-down. Or, they could've just been put there as red herrings. Or both. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted August 11, 2003 Explaining every little detail of this turn is insulting to the viewer Assuming that the viewer is too stupid to notice a problem is more insulting. I think the FBI was there because Nunzio just finished his match. Maybe they found him on their way back. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Corey_Lazarus 0 Report post Posted August 11, 2003 Oh, you THINK that's what happened? But they never flat-out told us why they were there. It's not obvious as to why they were there, Cole and Tazz never said "oh, the FBI must be there to admire the beatdown" or any such thing. How do you know they're not in on it? ...see how being a nitpicking bastard is uber-annoying? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
J. Hungerford Smith 0 Report post Posted August 11, 2003 Yeah! And how did Funaki know?! Vince must've paid him to come and interrupt him and the Undertaker! But I guess we'll find out this week when they spend the entire 2 hours breaking down every minor detail of this whole conspiracy! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted August 11, 2003 Oh, you THINK that's what happened? But they never flat-out told us why they were there. It's not obvious as to why they were there, Cole and Tazz never said "oh, the FBI must be there to admire the beatdown" or any such thing. How do you know they're not in on it? ...see how being a nitpicking bastard is uber-annoying? It would anwer a lot of questions if The FBI was in on it. And I find nothing annoying with pointing out logic gaps that the WWF couldn't be bothered to fix. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Corey_Lazarus 0 Report post Posted August 11, 2003 However, the rest of us find it annoying that you're pointing out something that doesn't need a huge explanation. You're looking TOO HARD to find it. See the forest for the trees, man. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted August 12, 2003 You're looking TOO HARD to find it. Not really. As soon as Cole screamed "He was never attacked!" I thought "Well then what the hell were the EMTs doing?" I didn't scour the show. However, the rest of us find it annoying that you're pointing out something that doesn't need a huge explanation I don't want a huge explanation. I want a comment in the explanation for the turn. Of, course, why even bother with an explanation for the turn? I'm sure we could figure it out ourselves, and look, they already did it with such success for Rhyno! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest wildpegasus Report post Posted August 12, 2003 Anglesault's right on the mark. All I could think about while I was watching the EMT's was "Man, has the WWE ever heard of logic?" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted August 12, 2003 But here's a more valid question to all our Lives.... WHO SHOT MR. BURNS?!?!?! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
