Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Guest I'm That Damn Zzzzz

Company Fined $2M in 1st Anti-Spam Case

Recommended Posts

Guest I'm That Damn Zzzzz

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor..._spam_lawsuit_2

Company Fined $2M in 1st Anti-Spam Case

Fri Oct 24, 8:46 PM ET

Add Technology - AP to My Yahoo!

 

By RACHEL KONRAD, Associated Press Writer

 

SAN JOSE, Calif. - A company accused of sending unsolicited bulk e-mail was fined $2 million by a judge Friday, the first such ruling under California's anti-span law.

 

PW Marketing LLC and its owners, Paul Willis and Claudia Griffin, were also banned from owning, managing, or holding an economic interest in any company that advertises over the Internet without first notifying the attorney general. The injunction will remain in place for 10 years.

 

The company, which does not have a Web site and has been accused of operating under fictitious names, has sent millions of illegal, unsolicited e-mails advertising tools for spamming, including $39 how-to books and lists of e-mail addresses of California residents.

 

Prosecutors said PW Marketing violated the 1998 anti-spam law by sending unsolicited e-mail without a toll-free number for recipients to call to stop additional mailings. Its missives did not include a valid return address or the "ADV:" label to mark advertisements, which the state requires.

 

State attorneys also claimed the owners illegally tapped into computer users' network connections so the company could send e-mail that couldn't be traced back to its source.

 

Calls to Willis and Griffin, who also face a lawsuit by the Federal Trade Commission, were not immediately returned Friday. Neither owner has appeared in Santa Clara County Superior Court in San Jose since the state filed the lawsuit in September 2002, said Tom Dresslar, spokesman for the California Attorney General Bill Lockyer.

 

Dresslar said the state would do "everything it can within reason" to collect the money from Willis and Griffin.

 

Lockyer said the 10-year ban could serve as a precedent for other companies or individuals accused of sending spam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×